Rapid Screening Circuit of COVID 19 in Schools, Pilot Study

The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by acute respiratory syndrome severe coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), emerged in Wuhan in December 2019 and has spread which poses a serious threat to public health. While 80% of the patients are asymptomatic or have a mild illness, 20% develop a serious illness. Predominant symptoms include fever, cough, and myalgias.

Most children have one mild or asymptomatic disease that can be resolved without medical attention and that, exceptionally, may progress to pneumonia and respiratory failure requiring hospitalization

Schools have started the course with strict protocols to prevent the transmission of SARS-Cov-2 among the members of the educational communities and thus avoid an uncontrollability of the epidemic. These protocols include scaled entrances in the centers and differentiated circulation to optimize compliance with social distance. They also include the creation of coexistence groups, the Ventilation of the spaces, hand washing, disinfection of furniture, and wearing a face mask. One key point in the prevention of infection is the rapid detection of infected individuals, their isolation immediate and quarantine, and screening of coexistence groups of positive cases. The diagnosis of Suspicious cases from both schools and other settings is done with a PCR, mostly in Primary Care Centers (PCC). This is causing an increased considerable volume of work for primary care centers.

In addition to the overload of the PCCs, the waiting time between sampling and PCR means that the person must remain at home until the result is obtained, with the negative impact that this means on the daily lives of students, teachers, and families. The use of a quick test performed on the own schools and with staff from the center itself trained to do this first screening would have three very relevant consequences for the system:

  1. Speed up the diagnosis and minimize the waiting time between the presentation of symptoms and quarantine of the whole group (if positive)
  2. Avoid a waiting time at home with the alteration - often unnecessary - of the day of students, their families, and school staff.
  3. Decongest the PCCs, receiving only the cases that need confirmation

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by acute respiratory syndrome severe coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), emerged in Wuhan in December 2019 and has spread which poses a serious threat to public health. While 80% of the patients are asymptomatic or have a mild illness, 20% develop a serious illness. Predominant symptoms include fever, cough, and myalgias.

Most children have one mild or asymptomatic disease that can be resolved without medical attention and that, exceptionally, may progress to pneumonia and respiratory failure requiring hospitalization

Schools have started the course with strict protocols to prevent the transmission of SARS-Cov-2 among the members of the educational communities and thus avoid an uncontrollability of the epidemic. These protocols include scaled entrances in the centers and differentiated circulation to optimize compliance with social distance. They also include the creation of coexistence groups, the Ventilation of the spaces, hand washing, disinfection of furniture, and wearing a face mask. One key point in the prevention of infection is the rapid detection of infected individuals, their isolation immediate and quarantine, and screening of coexistence groups of positive cases. The diagnosis of Suspicious cases from both schools and other settings is done with a PCR, mostly in Primary Care Centers (PCC). This is causing an increased considerable volume of work for primary care centers.

In addition to the overload of the PCCs, the waiting time between sampling and PCR means that the person must remain at home until the result is obtained, with the negative impact that this means on the daily lives of students, teachers, and families. The use of a quick test performed on the own schools and with staff from the center itself trained to do this first screening would have three very relevant consequences for the system:

  1. Speed up the diagnosis and minimize the waiting time between the presentation of symptoms and quarantine of the whole group (if positive)
  2. Avoid a waiting time at home with the alteration - often unnecessary - of the day of students, their families, and school staff.
  3. Decongest the PCCs, receiving only the cases that need confirmation

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

153

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Barcelona, Spain, 08017
        • John Talabot
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08022
        • Escola l'Horitzó

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years to 65 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Students older than 6 years, teachers, administrative and service staff who attend regularly to L'Horitzó school.
  • All participants will be required to sign an informed consent form performing a nasal and nasopharyngeal swab for performing a rapid detection test of antigens (In students under the age of 12, informed consent will be signed by their parent or legal tutor, in students equal to or older than 12 years, but under 18 consent it will be signed both by the student and by his / her parent or legal guardian. The participant over the age of 18 will sign the document in person, unless it is incapacitated, in which case you must sign your legal representative).

Exclusion Criteria:

• Not applicable

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental group
People attending L'Horitzó School (students, teachers, administrative and service staff)
Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection by rapid antigen detection tests in nasal and nasopharyngeal swabs, in asymptomatic and symptomatic subjects who attend regularly to L'Horitzó school .
Other: Control Group
Escola John Talabot, will provide the incidence rate of infections by SARS-CoV-2
John Talabot School will provide the incidence of infection by SARS-CoV-2 in order to compare the incidence of infection from L'Horitzó School.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence rate of people infected with SARS-CoV-2
Time Frame: up to 8 weeks
Incidence rate of asymptomatic people infected with SARS-CoV-2, detected by rapid antigen detection tests in nasal swabs (self -taken)
up to 8 weeks
Incidence rate of people infected with SARS-CoV-2
Time Frame: up to 8 weeks
Incidence rate of symptomatic/asymptomatic people infected with SARS-CoV-2, detected by rapid antigen detection tests in nasopharyngeal swabs performed by trained teachers from the school L'Horitzó
up to 8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence rate of people infected with SARS-CoV-2
Time Frame: up to 8 weeks
Incidence rate of symptomatic people infected with SARS-CoV-2, detected by PCR nasopharyngeal performed under clinical practice.
up to 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Boris Revollo Barriga, PhD, MD, Fundació FLS de Lluita contra la Sida, les Malalties Infeccioses i la Promoció de la Salut i La Ciència

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 22, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 17, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

June 17, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 28, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 17, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19)

3
Subscribe