Constructive Variations of Classic Orthopedic Braces for Spinal Deformity During Growth

Constructive Variations of Classic Orthopedic Braces for Spinal Deformity During Growth: Efficacy Analysis of a Retrospective Cohort

The construction methods of the same brace vary on an experiential basis according to who builds them, the prescriber, the characteristics of the patients and also the innovations introduced to ensure greater comfort for the patient. The closure of the brace or the way in which the two shells are fixed varies at the discretion of the orthopedic technician. Plastic materials have also changed. In addition, the use of the classic cast for the production of the negative model was gradually replaced by cad-cam technology. In some cases, modular constructions were introduced with respect to the customized one. All this has changed the classic corsets over time, even without changing their name / type, and according to the hypothesis that their effectiveness remained at least the same, if not even improved.

There are no publications that have shown variations in efficacy that can be correlated with some of these stylistic variations.

The purpose of this study is to retrospectively investigate whether the various innovations and stylistic variations over time have had an effect on the clinical, functional and radiographic outcomes in growing subjects suffering from spinal deformity treated with corsets at a specialized center.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

470

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 16 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Growing subjects suffering from spinal deformity (adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and / or hyperkyphosis) undergoing brace treatment.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Idiopathic adolescent scoliosis and/or dorsal hyperkyphosis,
  • age under 16 years at the start of observation,
  • brace prescription for more than 18 hours/day,
  • availability of radiographs of the entire spine while standing and in brace radiographs at 1 month or out of brace at 5 ± 2 months at the end growth after 48 hours without brace and at 1 year.
  • availability of compliance data
  • Risser between 0 and 4 at first assessment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • All secondary causes of scoliosis
  • history of spinal fusion surgery
  • lack of one of the radiographic examinations required by the protocol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Polyehtylene vs Poliìycarbonate
super rigid vs rigid material
Free pelvis vs classic pelvis
fixed pelvis versus free pelvis, allowing adjustment in the sagittal plane.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in radiographic measurements
Time Frame: pre-treatment, in brace after a month from the start of wearing and without brace after 5 ± 2 months, after an average period of 4 years +/-2 , after 48 hours without brace and 1 year later.
variation of Cobb degrees of the main curve in the frontal plane over time
pre-treatment, in brace after a month from the start of wearing and without brace after 5 ± 2 months, after an average period of 4 years +/-2 , after 48 hours without brace and 1 year later.
Changes in radiographic measurements
Time Frame: pre-treatment, in brace after a month from the start of wearing and without brace after 5 ± 2 months, after an average period of 4 years +/-2 , after 48 hours without brace and 1 year later.
variation of Cobb degrees of all curves in the frontal and sagittal plane over time.
pre-treatment, in brace after a month from the start of wearing and without brace after 5 ± 2 months, after an average period of 4 years +/-2 , after 48 hours without brace and 1 year later.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HRQOL
Time Frame: pre-treatment, after a month from the start of brace wearing, after 5 ± 2 months, after an average period of 4 years +/-2 , and 1 year later
measures of quality of life. The Italian Spine Youth Quality of Life questionnaire (ISYQOL) measures the health-related quality of life of adolescents with spinal deformities. ISYQOL consists of 20 items, each scored 0, 1 or 2. In accordance with the Rasch analysis technique, used to develop the questionnaire, the ordinal ISYQOL total score is converted to an interval measure (i.e., ISYQOL measure), which is expressed on a 0%-100% scale (with 100% indicating high quality of life).
pre-treatment, after a month from the start of brace wearing, after 5 ± 2 months, after an average period of 4 years +/-2 , and 1 year later
HRQOL
Time Frame: pre-treatment, after a month from the start of brace wearing, after 5 ± 2 months, after an average period of 4 years +/-2 , and 1 year later
measures of quality of life. The Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) is a questionnaire developped to measure health-related quality of life in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. It has 22 questions divided into five domains: function/activity, pain, self-image/appearance, mental health and satisfaction with management. Each domain contains five questions, except the satisfaction with management domain, which contains two questions. Each item can be scored from 1 (worst possible) to 5 (best possible). The function/activity, pain, self-image and mental health domains have a total score ranging from 5 to 25. The satisfaction with management domain has a total score ranging from 2 to 10. The maximum total score is 110 and the results are expressed as a mean
pre-treatment, after a month from the start of brace wearing, after 5 ± 2 months, after an average period of 4 years +/-2 , and 1 year later
Treatment outcome
Time Frame: after an average period of 4 years +/-2
variation of the main curve of at least 5 Cobb degrees, end treatment results: main curve </=30 Cobb degrees, main curve </=45 Cobb degrees, and main curve >50 Cobb degrees
after an average period of 4 years +/-2
Treatment compliance
Time Frame: after a month from the start of brace wearing, after 5 ± 2 months, and after an average period of 4 years +/-2
Treatment compliance measures: percentage of brace wearing declared and measured by heat sensors
after a month from the start of brace wearing, after 5 ± 2 months, and after an average period of 4 years +/-2
Deformity clinical measures
Time Frame: pre-treatment, after a month from the start of brace wearing, after 5 ± 2 months,after an average period of 4 years +/-2 , and 1 year later
score on the evaluation of the aesthetic profile of the trunk (TRACE)
pre-treatment, after a month from the start of brace wearing, after 5 ± 2 months,after an average period of 4 years +/-2 , and 1 year later
Deformity clinical measures
Time Frame: pre-treatment, after a month from the start of brace wearing, after 5 ± 2 months,after an average period of 4 years +/-2 , and 1 year later
measurement of the hump on the Adams test in degrees
pre-treatment, after a month from the start of brace wearing, after 5 ± 2 months,after an average period of 4 years +/-2 , and 1 year later
Deformity clinical measures
Time Frame: pre-treatment, after a month from the start of brace wearing, after 5 ± 2 months,after an average period of 4 years +/-2 , and 1 year later
measurement of the hump on the Adams test in millimeters
pre-treatment, after a month from the start of brace wearing, after 5 ± 2 months,after an average period of 4 years +/-2 , and 1 year later

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 12, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 24, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

May 27, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 14, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • COB-ISICO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Scoliosis

3
Subscribe