Treatment Outcomes With Full Arch Rehabilitations Retained by Immediate or Conventionally Loaded Implants (ILOD)

June 17, 2021 updated by: JAVIER MONTERO, University of Salamanca

Treatment Outcomes With Full Arch Rehabilitations Supported by Immediate or Conventionally Loaded Implants: A Randomized Clinical Trial

This study aims to assess the treatment outcomes (clinical, functional and subjective) of full arch rehabilitations supported by implants with or without an immediate loading protocol. In this randomized clinical trial 20 fully edentulous patients were treated with full arch rehabilitations on dental implants. In half of the sample, the implants were loaded immediately by means of abutments after emplacement of the implant; but in the counterparts these abutments were connected to implants two months after the surgery (conventional protocol), and until that time the dentures were retained by healing abutments. Treatment outcomes were assessed at 2, 6 and 12 months after surgery. Clinical outcomes were quantified on the basis of implant failure rate, marginal bone loss and the peri-implant gingival index. Functional outcomes were calculated according to masticatory performance, estimated by the mixed fraction of a two-coloured chewing gum after 5, 10 and 15 chewing strokes, by the occlusal force recorded by pressure-sensitive sheets and by the bioelectrical muscular activity. The subjective outcomes of the treatment were assessed using both the oral satisfaction scale (visual analogue scale) and the Spanish version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-20).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Salamanca, Spain, 37007
        • Clinica Odontológica de la Universidad de Salamanca

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • completely edentulous individuals who had lacked teeth for more than 10 years, routine users of conventional complete prostheses.
  • sufficient amount of remaining bone to receive the implants in the region of the mandibular canines (minimum height=15 mm/minimum ridge width= 5mm)
  • no evidence of systemic or psychic pathology that might contraindicate the implant treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those in which oral surgery or cognitive evaluations are contraindicated

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional Loading
implants are loaded at least after two months of healing
Placement of dental implants with different loading protocols for supporting full arch dentures.
Experimental: Immediate Loading
implants are loaded the same day of surgery
Placement of dental implants with different loading protocols for supporting full arch dentures.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Performance of Dental implants
Time Frame: One year after treatment
Implant failure rate
One year after treatment
Oral health-related quality of life
Time Frame: One year after treatment
impact according to the OHIP-20 (Oral Health Impact Profile) instrument. The score range from 0 to 20, being 20 the worst outcome.
One year after treatment
Mastication
Time Frame: One year after treatment
Mixing ability tests
One year after treatment
Area of Occlusal Occlusion
Time Frame: One year after treatment
According to pressure-sensitive colorimetric sheets it is recorded the area in square millimeters
One year after treatment
Occlusal Load
Time Frame: One year after treatment
According to the pressure-sensitive colorimetric sheets , the load in both the anterior and posterior region of the arch are calculated.
One year after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 11, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 11, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

January 11, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 10, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 17, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 17, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Missing Teeth

Clinical Trials on Implant supported dentures

Subscribe