Soft Tissue Responses Around Nanostructured Calcium-phosphate-coated Implant Abutments on Dental Implants: Histological, Genetic and Clinical Evaluation in Smokers and Non-smokers. (STRANDI)

November 18, 2021 updated by: University Ghent
  • Baseline:

    • Standard preparation of the osteotomy
    • Placement of 2 dental implants
    • On each implant one of both types of healing abutments is placed
    • Suturing
    • Standardized radiography to measure bone-levels at baseline
    • Digital impression of the surrounding gingiva with an intra-oral scanner (a non-invasive method) to measure the baseline level of the gingiva
  • 2 weeks after Baseline:

    o Removal of the sutures

  • 4 weeks after Baseline:

    • A 2nd digital impression of the soft tissue with an intra-oral scanner
    • Collecting crevicular fluid by placing paperpoints in the provided apertures in the healing abutments for 60 seconds without bleeding.
    • Measuring of the pocket depth in the provided apertures in the healing abutments with an automated probe.
    • Removal of the Healing Abutment with the attached soft tissue en-bloque.
    • Placement of a new, regular, Encode Healing Abutment.
  • 10 weeks after Baseline:

    • Start of standard prosthetic procedure. In this study we expect that the soft tissue attachment (i.e. the gingival attachment) will be stronger and earlier achieved at the nano-structured healing abutments than at the normal, uncoated healing abutments. This would lead to a more stable soft tissue complex on the long rung and thus providing a more predictable aesthetic outcome. Secondly, a stronger attachment would mean a stronger barrier against micro-organisms and might influence the occurrence of peri-implantitis.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ghent, Belgium, 9000
        • Ghent University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients are eligible for this study if they are in need of minimum 2 dental implants and have sufficient bone to place these implants

Exclusion Criteria:

  • All patients with limited bone
  • Periodontally compromised patients
  • Patients who took antibiotics 3 months before implantation
  • Patients with uncontrolled diabetes
  • Pregnant patients
  • Patients who received radiotherapy in the head/neck region
  • Patients under chemotherapy
  • Patients who had intravenous use of bisphosphonates

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 2 types of healing abutment
Patients who are in need of minimal 2 dental implants, who will receive both types of healing abutments.
Patient receives the normal, uncoated healing abutment on 1 of his (minimal 2) dental implants.
Patient receives the nano-structured healing abutment on 1 of his (minimal 2) dental implants.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The soft-tissue attachment around 2 different surfaces at 4 weeks post-implantation.
Time Frame: at 4 weeks post-implantation
Genetic evaluation (through Polymerase Chain Reaction, PCR, the tissue will be detected for certain growth factors), histomorphometric analysis to measure the actual percentage of the surface on which the gingiva is attached to, clinical evaluation of the strength of the attachment through means of an automated probe.
at 4 weeks post-implantation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hugo De Bruyn, DDS, MSc, PhD, University Ghent

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 13, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

June 15, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 1, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2012/341

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Missing Several Teeth

Clinical Trials on normal healing abutment

Subscribe