EMOTIon and COgNitive Function After Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation vs. Medical Therapy(EMOTICON Trial)

June 18, 2021 updated by: Yonsei University

EMOTIon and COgNitive Function After Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation vs. Medical Therapy; Randomized Clinical Trial (EMOTICON Trial)

"Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an arrhythmic disease that increases especially in the elderly, increasing the risk of ischemic stroke by 5 times and is a major cause of dementia and cognitive impairment.

Cognitive dysfunction accompanying AF occurs regardless of the presence or absence of stroke, and AF itself is known to affect cognitive function.

However, since cognitive dysfunction is also affected by various accompanying chronic diseases, whether the cognitive dysfunction accompanying AF is due to subclinical ischemic stroke, cerebral hypoperfusion due to reduced cardiac output, inflammatory reaction or platelet dysfunction are unclear.

Recently, this research team reported an improvement in cognitive function with active sinus rhythm therapy such as AF catheter ablation. Nevertheless, it has not yet been proven whether such active and invasive AF treatment affects the improvement of cognitive function or depression by a randomized clinical trial.

In this prospective randomized clinical comparative study, the investigators will compare the AF catheter ablation group and drug therapy group in terms of cognitive function tests and depression psychological tests at baseline and a year after treatment. Our hypothesis is that AF catheter ablation is superior to drug therapy to improve cognitive function and depressive mood.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Study design

  1. Prospective randomization (catheter ablation group vs. drug treatment group) (Python program is used, the random number module is imported using the import random syntax, and the random number table of the two groups is prepared and used)
  2. Target number of targets 320 (160 for each group)
  3. Cardiac rhythm follow-up: 2012 ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines (baseline, 3 months, every 6 months after Holter, Electrocardiogram when symptoms are present)
  4. Anticoagulant therapy follows 2014 ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines.
  5. Evaluation of MOCA score (cognitive function), CES-D score (depression), and GAD-7 score (anxiety) at baseline and a year after treatment, respectively.
  6. Evaluation of all adverse events occurring in each group, hospitalization rate, major cardiovascular attack, and mortality rate comparison

Progress and rhythm/ ECG follow-up

  1. Implemented in accordance with 2012 ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines for AF management
  2. Baseline MOCA, CES-D, and GAD-7 score evaluation
  3. Outpatient follow-up observation 1 to 2 weeks after the start of the procedure or medication
  4. Follow-up observation at intervals of 2 months, 6 months, and then every 6 months after starting the procedure or medication
  5. If the patient complains of arrhythmia symptoms, conduct an electrocardiogram at any time, and follow the rhythm with a Holter or event recorder.
  6. Follow-up MOCA, CES-D, and GAD-7 score evaluation

Follow-up observation

  • All patients are scheduled to visit the outpatient clinic every 6 months after 1~2 weeks, 2 months, 6 months, and even if they have symptoms in the middle, they will be treated as an outpatient at any time.
  • An ECG is administered at every outpatient visit. A 24-hour Holter or event recorder was administered for 1 year at intervals of 2, 6, and 6 months after the procedure (2012 Heart Rhythm Society/EHRA/European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society Expert Consensus Statement guidelines).
  • If atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia lasting more than 30 seconds is observed on a standard electrocardiogram, event electrocardiogram, or Holter, it is evaluated as recurrence. Recurrence within 3 months after the procedure is classified as early recurrence, and recurrence after 3 months is classified as clinical recurrence.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

320

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Yonsei University Health System, Severance Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients aged between 20 and 80 years of age who have appropriate indication for catheter ablation for AF
  2. AF patients with left atrium diameter <55 mm
  3. Antiarrhythmic drug-resistant AF
  4. Anticoagulation eligible patients

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. AF associated with severe cardiac malformation or structural heart disease
  2. Patients undergoing treatment for cognitive disorders, emotional disorders, and anxiety disorders
  3. Patients with severe renal dysfunction or difficulty in CT imaging using contrast media
  4. Patients with a previous history of AF ablation or other open heart surgery
  5. Patients with active internal bleeding
  6. Anticoagulant therapy not eligible patients
  7. Valvular AF (mitral valve stenosis>grade 2, mechanical valve, mitral valve reconstruction)
  8. Significant comorbidities
  9. Patients with an expected survival period of less than 1 year
  10. Drug or alcohol addiction patients
  11. Among eligible persons, those who cannot read the consent form (illiteracy, foreigners, etc.)
  12. Patients judged to be unsuitable for participation in clinical research based on the judgment of other researchers

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Atrial fibrillation catheter ablation group
catheter ablation
  1. Pulmonary vein isolation
  2. Additional treatment for lesions caused by non-pulmonary veins
  3. Esophageal temperature monitoring to prevent damage to the esophagus
  4. Evaluation of procedure time and radiofrequency ablation time
  5. Evaluation of complications after the procedure
  6. Rhythm follow-up after the procedure is conducted in accordance with the above study design.
  7. Conduct a survey on cognitive function and emotion before and 12 months after the procedure
Active Comparator: Medical therapy group
standard treatment include anti-arrhythmic drug
  1. Use of beta-blockers or calcium channel blockers for pulse rate control
  2. Antiarrhythmic drugs are administered to patients with highly symptomatic atrial fibrillation symptoms even after pulse rate control.
  3. If symptoms are not controlled even with antiarrhythmic drugs, electrical conversion to restore sinus rhythm.
  4. To prevent cerebral infarction, maintain optimal anticoagulant therapy according to the risk score for cerebral infarction.
  5. Conduct a questionnaire on cognitive function and emotion before and 12 months after the procedure

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in cognitive function, depression, and anxiety scale after catheter ablation or drug treatment after 1 year of randomization
Time Frame: 1 year
Compasison of scale change using the Moca questionnaire.
1 year
Changes in depression scale after catheter ablation or drug treatment after 1 year of randomization
Time Frame: 1 year
Compasison of scale change using the CES-D questionnaire.
1 year
Changes in anxiety scale after catheter ablation or drug treatment after 1 year of randomization
Time Frame: 1 year
Compasison of scale change using the GAD-7 questionnaire.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Differences according to AF type
Time Frame: 1year
1year
Differences in adverse effects of ablation vs. medications
Time Frame: 1year
1year
Differences in MACE, Death, and Readmission rate
Time Frame: 1year
1year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hui-Nam Pak, Yonsei University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

June 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 23, 2026

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 23, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 26, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 28, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 28, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 4-2020-1488

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical Trials on Atrial fibrillation catheter ablation group

3
Subscribe