Feasibility of the Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Intervention for Black Women Living With HIV Supplement

June 19, 2024 updated by: Crystal C. Lambert, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Feasibility of the Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Intervention for Black Women Living With HIV Administrative Supplement

In our Supplement Aim we will conduct a two-arm randomized pilot test of the adapted intervention compared to a usual care control group among 30 African American/Black women with HIV (15/arm) to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the mindfulness-based stress reduction among women with HIV with mild cognitive impairment. Feasibility will be assessed by our ability to (1) recruit, randomize, and retain participants and (2) deliver the intervention per the manual, as well as (3) participants adherence to home practices and assignments. Acceptability will be assessed via qualitative data (focus group input regarding participants' satisfaction with the intervention and intent to continue using the practices), as well quantitative data (satisfaction survey).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294
        • UAB School of Nursing

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Cisgender females
  • HIV seropositive
  • 18 years of age or older
  • English speaking
  • An active patient at the local HIV ambulatory clinic in Alabama.
  • No history of neurological (including dementia diagnosis)
  • No history of severe psychiatric (e.g., schizophrenia or bipolar disorder) disorders

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-English speaking
  • Appear temporarily impaired (e.g., intoxicated)
  • Not willing to or legally unable to provide informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mindfulness-based Stress Reduction
Mindfulness-based stress reduction sessions received by the treatment group will include an orientation, approximately 8 intervention sessions, and an exit interview.
The traditional mindfulness intervention consists of the following: (1) orientation; (2) a series of eight weekly session of 2.5 to 3 hours; (3) a silent retreat during the between weeks 4 and 6; (4) daily home assignments including formal and informal mindfulness practices; and (5) didactic presentations on stress and the consequences of stress.
Other: Usual Care
The control condition will continue receiving usual care or standard of care.
The control condition will continue receiving usual care or standard of care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of the Mindfulness Intervention in Women With Mild Cognitive Impairment
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention(which consists of an orientation followed by eight weekly sessions, consistent with MSBR interventions), the measure was collected within one week of completing the final session.
Feasibility was measured using a four-item feasibility of intervention measure. Each item is scored using a Likert-like scale ranging from "1" completely disagree to "5" completely agree. Higher scores indicate greater feasibility. The minimum total score is 4 points, and the maximum total score is 20.
Immediately after the intervention(which consists of an orientation followed by eight weekly sessions, consistent with MSBR interventions), the measure was collected within one week of completing the final session.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Medication Adherence
Time Frame: Immediately post-intervention
Adherence will be measured by the single-item antiretroviral therapy question. Higher scores indicate better antiretroviral therapy adherence.
Immediately post-intervention
Perceived Stress
Time Frame: Immediately post-intervention
Perceived stress will be measures using the perceived stress scale (PSS), with higher scores indicating higher perceived stress.
Immediately post-intervention
Mental Distress
Time Frame: immediately post-intervention
Mood will be assessed using the PHQ-8. Higher scores are indicate increased symptom severity.
immediately post-intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 2, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 10, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

December 14, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 19, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

July 30, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 19, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • K23AT010567S
  • K23AT010567 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The University of Alabama at Birmingham maintains the following universal data sharing policy for all investigators:

  1. Data will be made available, in accordance with the NIH Data Sharing Policy (http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/data_sharing) to all researchers in both the private and public sector free or for a nominal charge and with minimal restriction. In some cases the institution may determine that the public and the research community are better served by a licensing program whether or not patents have been filed. This may be relevant, for example, if a tool is best distributed under license to guarantee reagent availability and quality.
  2. As a means of sharing knowledge, NIH encourages grantees to arrange for publication of NIH-supported original research in primary scientific journals. We therefore will strive to publish our findings in a timely manner and acknowledge that the research was supported by the NIH.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe