Measuring Subjective Quality of Vision and Metamorphopsia Before and After Epiretinal Membrane and Macular Hole Surgery (MQUEST)

December 10, 2021 updated by: Hayley Westwood
Assessing metamorphopsia and quality of vision pre and post epiretinal and macular hole surgery

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Metamorphopsia is a visual symptom in which straight lines appear distorted, for example a vertical window blind may appear wavy which can affect quality of vision. Metamorphopsia is a common symptom in retinal conditions such as epiretinal membranes (ERM) and macular holes. There is a lack of studies analysing the prevalence of ERM in the UK and Europe.

Both of the conditions have shown to be a higher risk factor with age. With an aging population it is likely these numbers will increase. Currently the only treatment option is surgery (vitrectomy) or conservative management to monitor the condition. It would therefore be beneficial to find a tool that would inform the surgeon of a patient's quality of vision and how this impacts their life. A patient's severity of metamorphopsia reveals more precise information on the progression of the disease than visual acuity alone (Nomoto et al. 2013) therefore gaining a better understanding can help aid clinical decisions.

Current clinical practice is to monitor metamorphopsia with an Amsler chart, a grid with lines; the patient is then asked to draw where they can see distortion. They are used to detect metamorphopsia but are unable to quantify and provide an accurate measurement of the severity of metamorphopsia and quality of vision

The Quality of Vision questionnaire (QoV) (McAlinden et al. 2010) is a modern tool developed to specifically measure subjective quality of vision. The Metamorphopsia questionnaire (Arimura et al. 2011) has been developed to provide a measurement of subjective metamorphopsia in macular disease. Both have been psychometrically validated and are in use in a number of clinical trials worldwide.

It would be valuable to investigate the role of each questionnaire in identifying quality of vison and metamorphopsia pre- and post-surgery for ERM and macular holes to establish if there are changes to patient responses. We would compare this to visual acuity and optical coherence tomography (OCT) images pre- and post-surgery to see if changes correspond to the questionnaire responses. If a questionnaire can measure metamorphopsia and its impact on quality of vision in ERM and macular holes, this would assist in clinical decision making.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cardiff, United Kingdom, CF14 4XW
        • University Hospital of Wales

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who have epiretinal membranes or macular holes and have been listed for a vitrectomy

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participant is willing and able to give informed consent
  • >18 years old
  • Patients listed for epi retinal and macular hole surgery
  • Patient is able to perform study procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are diagnosed with a condition other than epiretinal membrane or macular hole

    • Patients not undergoing epiretinal or macular hole surgery
    • Patients will be excluded if there are any complications within surgery, or undergo any procedures that is not an epiretinal or macular hole surgery (i.e vitrectomy, phacoemulsification (lens extraction) as this can affect visual outcomes.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Macular holes
Epiretinal membranes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare the responses of the McAllinden and Metamorphopsia Questionnaire
Time Frame: pre surgery and 2 - 3 months post surgery
analysing changes to responses in the 2 questionnaires pre and post surgery
pre surgery and 2 - 3 months post surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes to BCVA score
Time Frame: Pre surgery and 2-3 months post surgery
Patients BCVA pre and post surgery to see if there is an improvement
Pre surgery and 2-3 months post surgery

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assess correlations between the Mcallinden and Metamorphopsia questionnaire scores and objective clinical parameters
Time Frame: Pre surgery and 2-3 month post surgery
do the questionnaires show changes pre and post surgery and do they match clinical outcomes
Pre surgery and 2-3 month post surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

October 16, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

October 31, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

December 29, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 29, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2021

Last Verified

December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe