The LEARN Study for CVD Prevention (LEARN)

July 14, 2026 updated by: Yale University

LEveraging A viRtual eNvironment (LEARN) to Enhance Prevention of HIV-related Comorbidities in At-risk Minority MSM

The investigator is testing a virtual environment (VE) to address prevention of HIV-related comorbidities.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The primary aims of this study are to test the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effects of a VE to address prevention of HIV-related comorbidities. A waitlist control feasibility clinical trial will be conducted. We will assign (N=80) eligible participants and ensure balanced allocation to intervention and control groups over the intervention period. We hypothesize that the VE will be feasible and acceptable to persons living with HIV, and that they will apply their VE learning to real-life situations and health behaviors for prevention of HIV-related comorbidities.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

78

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • Orange, Connecticut, United States, 06477
        • Yale University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • identify as an ethnic/racial minority with HIV
  • identify as gay, same-gender-loving, or MSM
  • able to read and understand English
  • access to a computer capable of downloading and running the VE software
  • no medical history of serious cardiovascular or cognitive complications

Exclusion Criteria:

Anything outside of inclusion parameters, including history of:

  • myocardial infarction (MI)
  • congestive heart failure (CHF)
  • coronary artery bypass graft (CABG)
  • cerebral vascular accident (CVA)
  • cognitive impairment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Immediate Intervention Group
Participants will enter an online game and learn about how to prevent cardiovascular and metabolic conditions.
To address the primary outcomes of feasibility and acceptability of the VE, we will capture process data using a computer-based virtual environment and self-report measures using an online survey.
Other: Waitlist Control Group
Participants will enter an online game at a later date after the immediate intervention group and learn about how to prevent cardiovascular and metabolic conditions.
To address the primary outcomes of feasibility and acceptability of the VE, we will capture process data using a computer-based virtual environment and self-report measures using an online survey.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of Virtual Environment Intervention
Time Frame: Baseline through Month 6
Feasibility was operationalized through recruitment metrics (proportion of individuals who enrolled from those initially contacted) and retention metrics (percentage of participants who completed 3-month and 6-month follow-up assessments from baseline analysis sample).
Baseline through Month 6
Acceptability of Virtual Environment- Engagement
Time Frame: 6-month intervention period
Acceptability was evaluated through engagement with the VE measured via platform metadata and logfile analysis.
6-month intervention period
Acceptability of Virtual Environment- Total Sessions
Time Frame: 6-month intervention period
Acceptability was evaluated through total sessions logged in the VE measured via platform metadata and logfile analysis.
6-month intervention period
Acceptability of Virtual Environment- Mean Session Duration
Time Frame: 6-month intervention period
Acceptability was evaluated through mean session duration in the VE in minutes measured via platform metadata and logfile analysis.
6-month intervention period
Acceptability of Virtual Environment- Total Educational Quests Accessed
Time Frame: 6-month intervention period
Acceptability was evaluated through the total number of distinct educational quests accessed in the VE measured via platform metadata and logfile analysis.
6-month intervention period
Acceptability of Virtual Environment- Percent VE District Visits
Time Frame: 6-month intervention period
Acceptability was evaluated through the percentage of visits for each of the districts within the VE measured via platform metadata and logfile analysis.
6-month intervention period
Acceptability of Virtual Environment- Total Engagements Per Module
Time Frame: 6-month intervention period
Acceptability was evaluated through total number of engagements per module in the VE measured via platform metadata and logfile analysis.
6-month intervention period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 3 & 6

Between group change from baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) represented as Cohen's d effect size. Effect Size Interpretation: Negligible < 0.20; Small=0.20-0.39; Medium=0.40-0.69; Large≥0.70.

Positive values are favorable for intervention; negative values are unfavorable for intervention.

Baseline and Month 3 & 6
Change in Physical Activity
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 3
The International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form (IPAQ-SF) is a validated questionnaire that assesses physical activity through self-reported frequency and duration. Walking includes any walking for work, transport, or recreation (3.3 Metabolic Equivalent of Task or METs). Moderate-intensity activity includes activities requiring moderate effort such as carrying light loads or recreational swimming (4.0 METs). Vigorous-intensity activity includes activities requiring hard physical effort such as running or aerobics (8.0 METs). Total physical activity is calculated as MET-minutes per week (MET value × minutes × days). Values are reported as minutes per week or MET-minutes per week, with a minimum of 0 and no fixed maximum. Higher values indicate greater physical activity, which is favorable for cardiovascular health. Between group change from baseline represented as Cohen's d effect size. Effect Size Interpretation: Negligible < 0.20; Small=0.20-0.39; Medium=0.40-0.69; La
Baseline and Month 3
Change in Physical Activity
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6
The International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form (IPAQ-SF) is a validated questionnaire that assesses physical activity through self-reported frequency and duration. Walking includes any walking for work, transport, or recreation (3.3 Metabolic Equivalent of Task or METs). Moderate-intensity activity includes activities requiring moderate effort such as carrying light loads or recreational swimming (4.0 METs). Vigorous-intensity activity includes activities requiring hard physical effort such as running or aerobics (8.0 METs). Total physical activity is calculated as MET-minutes per week (MET value × minutes × days). Values are reported as minutes per week or MET-minutes per week, with a minimum of 0 and no fixed maximum. Higher values indicate greater physical activity, which is favorable for cardiovascular health. Between group change from baseline represented as Cohen's d effect size. Effect Size Interpretation: Negligible < 0.20; Small=0.20-0.39; Medium=0.40-0.69; La
Baseline and Month 6
Tobacco and E-cigarette Use- Question 1
Time Frame: Baseline
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS)- self report measure questions that pertain to Tobacco use and E-cigarette use. Participants were asked: Question 1: "Have you smoked at least 100 cigarettes in your entire life?"
Baseline
Tobacco and E-cigarette Use- Question 2
Time Frame: Baseline
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS)- self report measure questions that pertain to Tobacco use and E-cigarette use. Participants were asked: Question 2 "Do you now smoke cigarettes every day, some days, or not at all?"
Baseline
Tobacco and E-cigarette Use- Question 3
Time Frame: Baseline
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS)- self report measure questions that pertain to Tobacco use and E-cigarette use. Participants were asked: Question 3: "During the past 12 months, have you stopped smoking for one day or longer because you were trying to quit smoking?"
Baseline
Tobacco and E-cigarette Use- Question 4
Time Frame: Baseline
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS)- self report measure questions that pertain to Tobacco use and E-cigarette use. Participants were asked: Question 4: "How long has it been since you last smoked a cigarette, even one or two puffs?"
Baseline
Tobacco and E-cigarette Use- Question 5
Time Frame: Baseline
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS)- self report measure questions that pertain to Tobacco use and E-cigarette use. Participants were asked: Question 5: "Do you currently use chewing tobacco, snuff, or snus every day, some days, or not at all?"
Baseline
Tobacco and E-cigarette Use- Question 6
Time Frame: Baseline
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS)- self report measure questions that pertain to Tobacco use and E-cigarette use. Participants were asked: Question 6: "Have you ever used an e-cigarette or other electronic "vaping" product, even just one time, in your entire life?"
Baseline
Tobacco and E-cigarette Use- Question 7
Time Frame: Baseline
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS)- self report measure questions that pertain to Tobacco use and E-cigarette use. Participants were asked: Question 7: "Do you now use e-cigarettes or other electronic "vaping" products every day, some days, or not at all?"
Baseline
Change in Nutrition Intake
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 3
Dietary intake was assessed using the NCI Multifactor Screener, a validated food frequency questionnaire that reports how frequently individuals consume foods in 6 categories. Vegetables, fruit, and whole grains were measured as average daily servings; sweets, red meat, and fast food were measured as weekly servings or meals. Values are self-reported counts with a minimum of 0 and no fixed maximum. Adherence was evaluated against dietary guidelines recommending ≥3 servings of vegetables and ≥2.5 servings of fruit daily. For vegetables, fruit, and whole grains, higher values indicate healthier dietary patterns (favorable). For sweets, red meat, and fast food, lower consumption is favorable for cardiovascular health. Between group change from baseline represented as Cohen's d effect size. Effect Size Interpretation: Negligible < 0.20; Small=0.20-0.39; Medium=0.40-0.69; Large≥0.70. Positive values are favorable for intervention; negative values are unfavorable for intervention.
Baseline and Month 3
Change in Nutrition Intake
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6
Dietary intake was assessed using the NCI Multifactor Screener, a validated food frequency questionnaire that reports how frequently individuals consume foods in 6 categories. Vegetables, fruit, and whole grains were measured as average daily servings; sweets, red meat, and fast food were measured as weekly servings or meals. Values are self-reported counts with a minimum of 0 and no fixed maximum. Adherence was evaluated against dietary guidelines recommending ≥3 servings of vegetables and ≥2.5 servings of fruit daily. For vegetables, fruit, and whole grains, higher values indicate healthier dietary patterns (favorable). For sweets, red meat, and fast food, lower consumption is favorable for cardiovascular health. Between group change from baseline represented as Cohen's d effect size. Effect Size Interpretation: Negligible < 0.20; Small=0.20-0.39; Medium=0.40-0.69; Large≥0.70. Positive values are favorable for intervention; negative values are unfavorable for intervention.
Baseline and Month 6
Change in Psychosocial Wellbeing
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 3 & 6
The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a validated 9-item questionnaire used to screen for depression. Each item is scored 0-3, with total scores ranging from 0 to 27. Severity categories: minimal (0-4), mild (5-9), moderate (10-14), moderately severe (15-19), severe (20-27). Higher scores indicate greater severity of depressive symptoms (unfavorable). Between group change from baseline represented as Cohen's d effect size. Effect Size Interpretation: Negligible < 0.20; Small=0.20-0.39; Medium=0.40-0.69; Large≥0.70. Positive values are favorable for intervention; negative values are unfavorable for intervention.
Baseline and Month 3 & 6
Change in Revised Illness Perceptions Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 3
Assesses cognitive and emotional representations of illness using 5-point Likert scales (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). Subscale scores are calculated as sum totals with the following ranges: Timeline Acute/Chronic (3-15), Timeline Cyclical (4-20), Consequences (5-25), Personal Control (4-20), Treatment Control (4-20), Illness Coherence (4-20), and Emotional Representations (6-30). Higher scores indicate stronger beliefs in each domain. For Personal Control, Treatment Control, and Illness Coherence, higher scores indicate more adaptive beliefs (favorable). For Consequences and Emotional Representations, higher scores indicate more negative perceptions (unfavorable). Between group change from baseline represented as Cohen's d effect size. Effect Size Interpretation: Negligible < 0.20; Small=0.20-0.39; Medium=0.40-0.69; Large≥0.70. Positive values are favorable for intervention; negative values are unfavorable for intervention.
Baseline and Month 3
Change in Revised Illness Perceptions Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6

The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire was used to assess perceptions about hypertension and diabetes on a 5-point Likert scale ("strongly disagree" to "strongly agree") over 8 dimensions. Between group change from baseline represented as Cohen's d effect size. Effect Size Interpretation: Negligible < 0.20; Small=0.20-0.39; Medium=0.40-0.69; Large≥0.70.

Positive values are favorable for intervention; negative values are unfavorable for intervention.

Baseline and Month 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: S. Raquel Ramos, PhD, MBA, MSN, FNP-BC, Yale University School of Nursing

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 10, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 28, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 16, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 16, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Diseases

Clinical Trials on Gaming in a virtual environment

3
Subscribe