- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05263921
Relative Bioavailability Study of PF-07321332/Ritonavir Oral Powder Relative to the Commercial Tablets in Healthy Participants
June 5, 2024 updated by: Pfizer
A PHASE 1, OPEN-LABEL, RANDOMIZED, SINGLE-DOSE, CROSSOVER STUDY TO ESTIMATE THE RELATIVE BIOAVAILABILITY OF PF-07321332/RITONAVIR ORAL POWDER IN 3 DIFFERENT DELIVERY VEHICLES RELATIVE TO THE COMMERCIAL PF-07321332/RITONAVIR TABLETS IN HEALTHY ADULT PARTICIPANTS UNDER FASTED CONDITIONS
The purpose of this study is to estimate the relative bioavailability of PF-07321332/ritonavir oral powder relative to the commercial tablet formulation under fasted condition in healthy adult participants.
The study will also assess the effect of 3 different food vehicles on the relative bioavailability of the PF-07321332/ritonavir oral powder formulation as well as the safety, tolerability, and palatability of PF-07321332/ritonavir oral powder in healthy adult participants.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
12
Phase
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Connecticut
-
New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06511
- Pfizer Clinical Research Unit - New Haven
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participants who are overtly healthy as determined by medical evaluation including medical history, physical examination (PE), laboratory tests, vital signs and standard 12 lead ECGs.
- Body mass index (BMI) of 17.5 to 30.5 kg/m2; and a total body weight >50 kg (110 lb).
- Participants who are willing and able to comply with all scheduled visits, treatment plan, laboratory tests, lifestyle considerations, and other study procedures
Exclusion Criteria:
- Positive test result for SARS-CoV-2 infection at the time of Screening or Day -1.
- Evidence or history of clinically significant hematological, renal, endocrine, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, hepatic, psychiatric, neurological, or allergic disease (including drug allergies, but excluding untreated, asymptomatic, seasonal allergies at the time of dosing).
- Clinically relevant abnormalities requiring treatment (eg, acute myocardial infarction, unstable ischemic conditions, evidence of ventricular dysfunction, serious tachy or brady arrhythmias) or indicating serious underlying heart disease (eg, prolonged PR interval, cardiomyopathy, heart failure greater than New York Heart Association (NYHA) 1, underlying structural heart disease, Wolff Parkinson-White syndrome).
- Any condition possibly affecting drug absorption (eg, gastrectomy, cholecystectomy).
- History of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, hepatitis B, or hepatitis C; positive testing for HIV, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), or hepatitis B surface antibody (HCVAb). Hepatitis B vaccination is allowed.
- Use of prescription or nonprescription drugs and dietary and herbal supplements within 7 days or 5 half lives (whichever is longer) prior to the first dose of study intervention.
- Participant who have received a COVID-19 vaccine within 7 days before screening or admission, or who are to be vaccinated with a COVID-19 vaccine at any time during the study confinement period.
- A positive urine drug test.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Basic Science
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Treatment A: PF-07321332/ritonavir
PF-07321332 ritonavir
|
Single oral dose of PF-07321332/ritonavir under fasted conditions
Single oral dose of PF-07321332/ritonavir mixed with water under fasted conditions
Single oral dose of PF-07321332/ritonavir mixed with applesauce under fasted conditions
Single oral dose of PF-07321332/ritonavir mixed with vanilla pudding under fasted conditions
|
|
Experimental: Treatment B: PF-07321332/ritonavir
PF-07321332/ritonavir mixed with water
|
Single oral dose of PF-07321332/ritonavir under fasted conditions
Single oral dose of PF-07321332/ritonavir mixed with water under fasted conditions
Single oral dose of PF-07321332/ritonavir mixed with applesauce under fasted conditions
Single oral dose of PF-07321332/ritonavir mixed with vanilla pudding under fasted conditions
|
|
Experimental: Treatment C: PF-07321332/ritonavir
PF-07321332/ritonavir mixed with applesauce
|
Single oral dose of PF-07321332/ritonavir under fasted conditions
Single oral dose of PF-07321332/ritonavir mixed with water under fasted conditions
Single oral dose of PF-07321332/ritonavir mixed with applesauce under fasted conditions
Single oral dose of PF-07321332/ritonavir mixed with vanilla pudding under fasted conditions
|
|
Experimental: Treatment D: PF-07321332/ritonavir
PF-07321332/ritonavir mixed with vanilla pudding
|
Single oral dose of PF-07321332/ritonavir under fasted conditions
Single oral dose of PF-07321332/ritonavir mixed with water under fasted conditions
Single oral dose of PF-07321332/ritonavir mixed with applesauce under fasted conditions
Single oral dose of PF-07321332/ritonavir mixed with vanilla pudding under fasted conditions
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
AUCinf of Nirmatrelvir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles Under Fasted Conditions
Time Frame: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours post-dose on Day 1 of each period
|
Area under the plasma concentration time profile from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf) was measured.
AUCinf was determined by AUClast + (Clast/kel), where Clast is the predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point estimated from the log-linear regression analysis.
|
0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours post-dose on Day 1 of each period
|
|
AUClast of Nirmatrelvir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles Under Fasted Conditions
Time Frame: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours post-dose on Day 1 of each period
|
Area under the plasma concentration time profile from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (Clast) was measured.
AUClast was determined by Linear/Log trapezoidal method.
|
0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours post-dose on Day 1 of each period
|
|
Cmax of Nirmatrelvir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles Under Fasted Conditions
Time Frame: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours post-dose on Day 1 of each period
|
Maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was measured.
Cmax was observed directly from data.
|
0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours post-dose on Day 1 of each period
|
|
AUCinf of Ritonavir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles Under Fasted Conditions
Time Frame: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours post-dose on Day 1 of each period
|
Area under the plasma concentration time profile from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf) was measured.
AUCinf was determined by AUClast + (Clast/kel), where Clast is the predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point estimated from the log-linear regression analysis.
|
0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours post-dose on Day 1 of each period
|
|
AUClast of Ritonavir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles Under Fasted Conditions
Time Frame: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours post-dose on Day 1 of each period
|
Area under the plasma concentration time profile from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (Clast) was measured.
AUClast was determined by Linear/Log trapezoidal method.
|
0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours post-dose on Day 1 of each period
|
|
Cmax of Ritonavir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles Under Fasted Conditions
Time Frame: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours post-dose on Day 1 of each period
|
Maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was measured.
Cmax was observed directly from data.
|
0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours post-dose on Day 1 of each period
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event
Time Frame: Baseline up to Follow-up (35 days after last dose administration), an average of 10 weeks.
|
Adverse events (AEs): any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product, without regard to relatedness.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs): AEs which occurred for the first time during the effective duration of treatment or AEs that increased in severity during treatment.
Serious AEs (SAEs) were any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life-threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or caused prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduction normal life functions).
AEs included SAEs and non-serious AEs.
Treatment-related TEAEs were any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study intervention.
Relatedness to study intervention was determined by the investigator.
|
Baseline up to Follow-up (35 days after last dose administration), an average of 10 weeks.
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities
Time Frame: Screening, Period 1 Day -1, Period 4 Day 4 and early termination/discontinuation.
|
Participants analyzed in the laboratory abnormalities were with at least one observation of the given laboratory test while on study treatment or during lag time.
Number of participants with laboratory abnormalities were number of participants with a laboratory abnormality meeting specified criteria while on study treatment or during lag time.
Hematology, chemistry, urinalysis and other (SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR, Urine drug screening, Pregnancy test (β hCG), eGFR [CKD-EPI], aPTT, PT-INR, Fibrinogen, At Screening only: FSH, HBsAg, HBsAb, HBcAb, HCVAb, HIV) were assessed.
|
Screening, Period 1 Day -1, Period 4 Day 4 and early termination/discontinuation.
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign Values
Time Frame: Screening, Day 1 of each period and early termination/discontinuation.
|
Participants with clinically significant vital sign values were with at least one observation of vital signs, which met pre-specified criteria while on study treatment or during lag time.
|
Screening, Day 1 of each period and early termination/discontinuation.
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Physical Examination Values
Time Frame: Screening and Period 1 Day -1.
|
Participants with clinically significant physical examination values were with at least one observation of physical examination, which met pre-specified criteria while on study treatment or during lag time.
|
Screening and Period 1 Day -1.
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiogram Values
Time Frame: Screening, Period 1 Day 1 and Period 4 Day 4.
|
Participants with clinically significant electrocardiogram (ECG) values were with at least one observation of ECG, which met pre-specified criteria while on study treatment or during lag time.
|
Screening, Period 1 Day 1 and Period 4 Day 4.
|
|
Taste Assessment of Mouth Feel After Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles
Time Frame: 1, 5, 10, 20 min after tasting each study intervention on Day 1 of each period.
|
Participants reviewed the taste questionnaire and instructions prior to the first taste assessment to treatments (B, C, D) on Period 1 Day 1.
Each participant completed the Taste Assessment Survey immediately following dosing (within 1 min) and at 5, 10, and 20 minutes post oral administration of PF-07321332/ritonavir oral powder.
For the taste assessment in the study, the data used in the analysis were transcribed and rescaled to a score from 0 to 100 from the raw measurements on the Taste Assessment Questionnaire.
The score of 0 was considered Favorable and the score of 100 was considered Not Favorable.
Higher score means more unfavorable.
|
1, 5, 10, 20 min after tasting each study intervention on Day 1 of each period.
|
|
Taste Assessment of Bitterness After Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles
Time Frame: 1, 5, 10, 20 min after tasting each study intervention on Day 1 of each period.
|
Participants reviewed the taste questionnaire and instructions prior to the first taste assessment to treatments (B, C, D) on Period 1 Day 1.
Each participant completed the Taste Assessment Survey immediately following dosing (within 1 min) and at 5, 10, and 20 minutes post oral administration of PF-07321332/ritonavir oral powder.
For the taste assessment in the study, the data used in the analysis were transcribed and rescaled to a score from 0 to 100 from the raw measurements on the Taste Assessment Questionnaire.
The score of 0 was considered Favorable and the score of 100 was considered Not Favorable.
Higher score means more unfavorable.
|
1, 5, 10, 20 min after tasting each study intervention on Day 1 of each period.
|
|
Taste Assessment of Tongue/Mouth Burn After Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles
Time Frame: 1, 5, 10, 20 min after tasting each study intervention on Day 1 of each period.
|
Participants reviewed the taste questionnaire and instructions prior to the first taste assessment to treatments (B, C, D) on Period 1 Day 1.
Each participant completed the Taste Assessment Survey immediately following dosing (within 1 min) and at 5, 10, and 20 minutes post oral administration of PF-07321332/ritonavir oral powder.
For the taste assessment in the study, the data used in the analysis were transcribed and rescaled to a score from 0 to 100 from the raw measurements on the Taste Assessment Questionnaire.
The score of 0 was considered Favorable and the score of 100 was considered Not Favorable.
Higher score means more unfavorable.
|
1, 5, 10, 20 min after tasting each study intervention on Day 1 of each period.
|
|
Taste Assessment of Throat Burn After Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles
Time Frame: 1, 5, 10, 20 min after tasting each study intervention on Day 1 of each period.
|
Participants reviewed the taste questionnaire and instructions prior to the first taste assessment to treatments (B, C, D) on Period 1 Day 1.
Each participant completed the Taste Assessment Survey immediately following dosing (within 1 min) and at 5, 10, and 20 minutes post oral administration of PF-07321332/ritonavir oral powder.
For the taste assessment in the study, the data used in the analysis were transcribed and rescaled to a score from 0 to 100 from the raw measurements on the Taste Assessment Questionnaire.
The score of 0 was considered Favorable and the score of 100 was considered Not Favorable.
Higher score means more unfavorable.
|
1, 5, 10, 20 min after tasting each study intervention on Day 1 of each period.
|
|
Taste Assessment of Overall Liking After Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles
Time Frame: 1, 5, 10, 20 min after tasting each study intervention on Day 1 of each period.
|
Participants reviewed the taste questionnaire and instructions prior to the first taste assessment to treatments (B, C, D) on Period 1 Day 1.
Each participant completed the Taste Assessment Survey immediately following dosing (within 1 min) and at 5, 10, and 20 minutes post oral administration of PF-07321332/ritonavir oral powder.
For the taste assessment in the study, the data used in the analysis were transcribed and rescaled to a score from 0 to 100 from the raw measurements on the Taste Assessment Questionnaire.
The score of 0 was considered Favorable and the score of 100 was considered Not Favorable.
Higher score means more unfavorable.
|
1, 5, 10, 20 min after tasting each study intervention on Day 1 of each period.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Pfizer
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
March 10, 2022
Primary Completion (Actual)
May 19, 2022
Study Completion (Actual)
May 19, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 25, 2022
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 25, 2022
First Posted (Actual)
March 3, 2022
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
June 6, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 5, 2024
Last Verified
June 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Anti-Infective Agents
- Antiviral Agents
- Enzyme Inhibitors
- Anti-HIV Agents
- Anti-Retroviral Agents
- Protease Inhibitors
- Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors
- Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme Inhibitors
- HIV Protease Inhibitors
- Viral Protease Inhibitors
- Ritonavir
- Nirmatrelvir
Other Study ID Numbers
- C4671024
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
IPD Plan Description
Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g.
protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions.
Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.