Effects of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation in Addition to Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in Stroke Patients

May 4, 2024 updated by: Esma Nur KOLBAŞI, Istanbul Medeniyet University
In recent studies, it has been reported that intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) provides additional benefits when applied in adjunct to the rehabilitation in all stages of stroke (acute, subacute, or chronic). In our study, it was aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of iTBS applied in addition to modified constraint-induced movement therapy (mCIMT). By doing so, we intend to increase patient adherence to neurorehabilitation and decrease the cost of rehabilitation.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • İstanbul, Turkey, 34394
        • Bakırköy Mazhar Osman Ruh ve Sinir Hastalıkları Hastanesi

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • First time and unilateral stroke
  • 1-12 months after the incident
  • Getting 24 points or more in Mini Mental Status Examination
  • Being able to stand for 2 minutes without any help by using the upper extremity as a support tool when necessary.
  • Being a low-functioning patient according to the CIMT criteria: a) At least 10 degrees of active wrist extension starting from the angle of full flexion, b) 10 degrees of extension at the metacarpophalangeal and inter-phalangeal joints of at least 2 fingers

Exclusion Criteria:

  • those who score more than 2.5 points on the Motor Activity Log-28 scale,
  • who have severe pain in the upper extremity (5 and above on the Visual Analogue Scale) and spasticity (3 and above on the Modified Ashworth Scale), which may affect the treatment, and
  • Those who do not have adequate communication skills.
  • Patients who have visual problems

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: iTBS + mCIMT group
Modified constraint-induced movement therapy (mCIMT): It is an intervention used to improve functionality and mobility in the more affected upper extremity post-stroke.
Intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS): It is a form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and it increases the facilitation of the motor cortex.
Sham Comparator: Sham iTBS+ mCIMT group
Modified constraint-induced movement therapy (mCIMT): It is an intervention used to improve functionality and mobility in the more affected upper extremity post-stroke.
Intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS): It is a form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and it increases the facilitation of the motor cortex.
Active Comparator: mCIMT group
Modified constraint-induced movement therapy (mCIMT): It is an intervention used to improve functionality and mobility in the more affected upper extremity post-stroke.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper extremity
Time Frame: 30 minutes
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) is a stroke-specific, performance-based impairment index. It is designed to assess motor functioning, balance, sensation and pain.
30 minutes
Wolf-Motor Function Test
Time Frame: 45 minutes
It is a new time-based method to evaluate upper extremity performance while providing insight into joint-specific and total limb movements
45 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs)
Time Frame: 10 minutes
MEPs are the electrical signals recorded from the descending motor pathways or from muscles following stimulation of motor pathways within the brain.
10 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Burcu Ersöz Hüseyinsinoğlu, Assoc. Prof., Marmara University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 2, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

September 15, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 25, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 25, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 4, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe