- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05368350
Treating Primary Progressive Aphasia and Apraxia of Speech Using Non-invasive Brain Stimulation
Treating Primary Progressive Aphasia and Apraxia of Speech With High Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (HDtDCS-PPA/PAOS)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This pilot study has one treatment arm with open-label treatment and will examine improvement of speech output, verbal fluency, and other cognitive deficits associated with primary progressive aphasia (PPA) and progressive apraxia of speech (PAOS), by utilizing 1 milliamp transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) active treatment applied to pre-supplementary motor area or left inferior frontal gyrus for 20 minutes over 10 sessions. There will be baseline testing, and follow up testing immediately after and 8 weeks after completion of treatment.
All patients with a clinical diagnosis of PPA or PAOS will be assigned to either one of the two open-label arms to receive active tDCS. Primary outcome speech and language measures, secondary neuropsychological and electroencephalography (EEG) measures, and pre-screening assessments for study medical history and contraindications for treatment will be collected prior to the treatment (i.e., baseline).
Primary outcome speech and language functions measures and secondary neuropsychological and electroencephalography (EEG) measures will be collected after treatment session 10 and following treatment competition (i.e., 8-week).
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Texas
-
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75235
- The University of Texas at Dallas
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 to 85 years of age
- A formal diagnosis of primary progressive aphasia (nonfluent/agrammatic, semantic, logopenic variants or mixed) and/or progressive apraxia of speech
- Capable of understanding and signing an informed consent. Medical information/history, as well as mental status exam and diagnosis provided by referring physician will determine whether or not a caregiver is required to be involved during this process.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Has an implanted device, such as a pacemaker, metallic cranial implant, or a neurostimulator
- Skull defects
- Pregnant
- A significant history of arrhythmia or epileptic seizures.
- Not a native English speaker
- Currently receiving speech-language intervention
- Unable to communicated verbally
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Active Pre-SMA tDCS treatment
This open-label treatment will examine improvement of speech output, verbal fluency, and other cognitive deficits associated with primary progressive aphasia (PPA) and progressive apraxia of speech (PAOS), by utilizing 1 milliamp transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) active treatment applied to pre-supplementary motor area for 20 minutes over 10 sessions.
There will be baseline testing, and follow up testing immediately after and 8 weeks after completion of treatment.
|
Other Names: tDCS 1 milliamp tDCS High definition tDCS High definition transcranial direct current stimulator, Neuroelectrics Starstim tES, SN E20200930-10 Transcranial direct current stimulation will be delivered via a Neuroelectrics Starstim tES. Stimulation will consist of 1 milliamp stimulation, with (1) Pre-SMA stimulation arm -- anodal stimulation delivered at electrode Fz (International 10/10 System for electroencephalography electrode placement) and electrodes F7, FP1, FP2, and F8 as returns or (2) LIFG stimulation arm -- at electrode F7 (International 10/10 System for electroencephalography electrode placement) and electrodes T7, FP1, AF3, and FC5 as returns. All electrodes are 1 cm diameter Ag/AgCl electrodes and make contact with the scalp via connective gel. Stimulation will linearly ramp up from 0 milliamps to 1 milliamp over 60 seconds, then remain at 1 milliamp of stimulation over 20 minutes, and finally ramping down at to 0 milliamps over 60 seconds. |
|
Experimental: Active LIFG tDCS treatment
This open-label treatment will examine improvement of speech output, verbal fluency, and other cognitive deficits associated with primary progressive aphasia (PPA) and progressive apraxia of speech (PAOS), by utilizing 1 milliamp transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) active treatment applied to left inferior frontal gyrus for 20 minutes over 10 sessions.
There will be baseline testing, and follow up testing immediately after and 8 weeks after completion of treatment.
|
Other Names: tDCS 1 milliamp tDCS High definition tDCS High definition transcranial direct current stimulator, Neuroelectrics Starstim tES, SN E20200930-10 Transcranial direct current stimulation will be delivered via a Neuroelectrics Starstim tES. Stimulation will consist of 1 milliamp stimulation, with (1) Pre-SMA stimulation arm -- anodal stimulation delivered at electrode Fz (International 10/10 System for electroencephalography electrode placement) and electrodes F7, FP1, FP2, and F8 as returns or (2) LIFG stimulation arm -- at electrode F7 (International 10/10 System for electroencephalography electrode placement) and electrodes T7, FP1, AF3, and FC5 as returns. All electrodes are 1 cm diameter Ag/AgCl electrodes and make contact with the scalp via connective gel. Stimulation will linearly ramp up from 0 milliamps to 1 milliamp over 60 seconds, then remain at 1 milliamp of stimulation over 20 minutes, and finally ramping down at to 0 milliamps over 60 seconds. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The Controlled Oral Word Association Test
Time Frame: Treatment change from Baseline to Immediate post, and 8 weeks post treatment completion.
|
Evaluation of treatment differences in change on the Control Word Association Test Benton, L.A., Hamsher, K., & Sivan, A.B., (1994). Multilingual aphasia examination. Iowa City: AJA Associates. |
Treatment change from Baseline to Immediate post, and 8 weeks post treatment completion.
|
|
Category Fluency
Time Frame: Treatment change from Baseline to Immediate post, and 8 weeks post treatment completion.
|
Evaluation of treatment differences in change on Category Fluency Benton, L.A., Hamsher, K., & Sivan, A.B., (1994). Multilingual aphasia examination. Iowa City: AJA Associates. |
Treatment change from Baseline to Immediate post, and 8 weeks post treatment completion.
|
|
The Boston Naming Test
Time Frame: Treatment change from Baseline to Immediate post, and 8 weeks post treatment completion.
|
Evaluation of treatment differences in change on The Boston Naming Test (accuracy and speech latency) Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S., (1983). Boston Naming Test (2nd ed.). Lea & Febiger: Philadelphia. |
Treatment change from Baseline to Immediate post, and 8 weeks post treatment completion.
|
|
Spontaneous speech (content and fluency) of the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised
Time Frame: Treatment change from Baseline to Immediate post, and 8 weeks post treatment completion.
|
Evaluation of treatment differences in change on Spontaneous speech (content and fluency) of the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised Kertesz, Andrew. ( 1982). The Western aphasia battery. New York :Grune & Stratton. |
Treatment change from Baseline to Immediate post, and 8 weeks post treatment completion.
|
|
The Apraxia battery for Adults - 2 (ABA - 2)
Time Frame: Treatment change from Baseline to Immediate post, and 8 weeks post treatment completion.
|
Evaluation of treatment differences in change on characteristics of articulation of the the Apraxia battery for Adults - 2 Dabul, B. L. (2000). Apraxia Battery for Adults (ABA-2) (2nd edn). Austin, TX: ProEd. |
Treatment change from Baseline to Immediate post, and 8 weeks post treatment completion.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The Trail Making Test (Part A & B)
Time Frame: Treatment change from Baseline to Immediate post, and 8 weeks post treatment completion.
|
Evaluation of treatment differences in change on The Trail Making Test (Part A & B) Reitan, R.M., (1958). Validity of the Trail Making Test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Percept. Motor Skill., 8, 271-276. |
Treatment change from Baseline to Immediate post, and 8 weeks post treatment completion.
|
|
The Digit Span Forward & Backward
Time Frame: Treatment change from Baseline to Immediate post, and 8 weeks post treatment completion.
|
Evaluation of treatment differences in change on The Digit Span Forward & Backward Wechsler, D., (2008). Wechsler adult intelligence scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV). San Antonio, TX: NCS Pearson. |
Treatment change from Baseline to Immediate post, and 8 weeks post treatment completion.
|
|
The Digit Symbol Substitution Test
Time Frame: Treatment change from Baseline to Immediate post, and 8 weeks post treatment completion.
|
Evaluation of treatment differences in change on The Digit Symbol Substitution Test Wechsler, D., (2008). Wechsler adult intelligence scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV). San Antonio, TX: NCS Pearson. |
Treatment change from Baseline to Immediate post, and 8 weeks post treatment completion.
|
|
The Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised
Time Frame: Treatment change from Baseline to Immediate post, and 8 weeks post treatment completion.
|
Evaluation of treatment differences in change on The Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised Benedict, R. H. B., Schretlen, D., Groninger, L., & Brandt, J. (1998). The Hopkins verbal learning test-revised: Normative data and analysis of interform and test-retest reliability. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 12, 43-55. |
Treatment change from Baseline to Immediate post, and 8 weeks post treatment completion.
|
|
The Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test
Time Frame: Treatment change from Baseline to Immediate post, and 8 weeks post treatment completion.
|
Evaluation of treatment differences in change on The Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test Rey, A. (1941). L'examen psychologique dans les cas d'encéphalopathie traumatique. (Les problems.). [The psychological examination in cases of traumatic encepholopathy. Problems.]. Archives de Psychologie, 28, 215- 285. |
Treatment change from Baseline to Immediate post, and 8 weeks post treatment completion.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: John Hart, MD, The University of Texas at Dallas
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Brain Diseases
- Central Nervous System Diseases
- Nervous System Diseases
- Mental Disorders
- Neurobehavioral Manifestations
- Neurocognitive Disorders
- Dementia
- Psychomotor Disorders
- Communication Disorders
- Language Disorders
- Aphasia
- Speech Disorders
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Signs and Symptoms
- Aphasia, Primary Progressive
- Apraxias
Other Study ID Numbers
- UTD IRB: 24-595
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.