Prediction of Knee Injuries Through System Dynamics Modeling

December 19, 2023 updated by: Charis Tsarbou, University of Patras

The large number of studies in the recent decade dealing with knee injury prevention seems not effective enough to cause a decline in knee injury rates. Thus, it has been proposed to use non-linear mathematical models that simulate the operation of complex and dynamic systems.

The present study aims to analyze the dynamic relationships of the risk factors for knee injuries through system dynamics modeling to effectively predict and prevent knee injury. The first part of this project includes a qualitative study informing the theoretical non-linear interrelationships among the risk factors. The aim is to examine the initial hypothetical model formulated in the first part of the project through statistical analysis such as factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Pre-season and in-season data from questionnaires and biomechanical measurements for risk factors will be collected from at least 100 athletes who participate in high-risk sports. The athletes will be monitored for injuries during one season, and these data will be used in the next part of the research plan. The next part of the project aims to develop a dynamic simulation model for predicting knee injuries using specific equations. The function of the simulation model will predict the propensity of knee injuries over time. The next step includes the validation and calibration of the model based on the knee injuries that occurred during the season. The validated and calibrated model will then provide implications for effective policy decisions in knee injury prevention.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Detailed Description

Although a large number of studies in the recent decade deal with the understanding of the risk factors and the improvement of injury prevention programs, the occurrence of knee injuries remains high. As a result, many studies recognize that sports injuries such as knee ACL injury is the result of a complex interaction of multiple risk factors which are interconnected in a non-linear way. Given the approaches to understanding the etiology of knee injuries so far, in most cases, some risk factors are examined and linked linearly to an injury. These approaches are useful enough to show the linear relationship between a particular risk factor and an injury, however, they fail to present the overall picture and dynamic interaction of the coexisting risk factors of an injury. Thus, in recent years, it has been proposed to use non-linear mathematical model that simulates the operation of complex and dynamic systems, with the ultimate goal of better understanding the dynamic interaction of various risk factors and improving prevention programs. Simulation modeling is considered to be a wise option because the complexities of problems are far beyond our capability to solve them manually. Simulation methods can be categorized into four main groups: Monte Carlo, discrete-event simulation, system dynamics, and agent-based simulation. Each group has its benefits regarding the topic examined. System dynamic modeling has been found useful in epidemic modeling and disease prevention strategies but to our knowledge has not yet been used in sports injury prevention topics. Therefore, the present study aims to analyze the captured dynamics of the risk factors for knee injuries through system dynamic modeling.

A better understanding of the intercorrelations among existing risk factors that contribute to knee injuries will be achieved through system dynamic methodology. Further, factors of comparable significance in injury prevention will be revealed. The use of system dynamics modeling in the field of sports injury prevention has not been incorporated into research methodology yet. This project will be the first attempt to capture the causal relationships among key risk factors for a knee injury and their dynamic interplay over time through system dynamic modeling. The developed dynamics model can be used to predict knee injuries and plan effective injury prevention programs.

SD modeling can be developed following specific tasks, including a clear explanation of the problem, generating a qualitative diagram of the system structure, converting the qualitative hypothesis to a quantitated simulation model, testing model, and informing policy decisions about model's implications.

The methodological procedure in this research project can be separated into three consecutive parts. The first part is a qualitive study that will inform about the theoretical non-linear interrelationships among the risk factors. The first step of the qualitative study is a comprehensive literature review to make a list of factors affecting knee injury among athletes and develop hypotheses about their interrelationships. Then, a Causal Loop Diagram (CLD) will be formulated based on the information extracted from the literature review and the application of group modelling building methodology. By this methodology experts in the field of sports injuries (this could be the modeling team) and stakeholders (sports scientists, doctors, other medical experts, coaches, trainers) will engaged in the modelling process based on a series of script workshops.

Specifically, the methodology of group modelling building is based on specific script exercises. More precisely, initially the reviewer will formulate a first perception of the causal relationships among the factors and a first overview of the Causal Loop Diagram. Afterwards, the modeling team will be incorporated in the modelling process. Approximately four series will be conducted for the formulation of the CLD. Then the CLD will be presented to main stakeholders selected by modeling team so as to engage their opinions about the CLD. Their opinions will be used to update the model. Then, the final casual diagram will be formulated.

The second part of the research project the object will be to quantify the interrelationships among factors using a structural equation model approach (SEM). Preseason and in-season data from 100 athletes will be collected using questionnaires and laboratory measurements that have been widely used in knee injury prediction surveys Structural equation modeling is a set of statistical techniques used to measure the complex relationships among variables to test the validity of theory using real data. It is similar but more powerful than regression analyses as it can investigate multiple hypothesized relationships among variables simultaneously while multiple regression does not allow such a holistic modeling. SEM can include several integrated analytic techniques such as group variance comparisons associated with ANOVA as well as regression analysis. Factor analysis is another special case of SEM whereby unobserved variables (factor or latent variables) are calculated from measured variables. In this way, SEM allows researchers to explain the development of phenomena such as diseases or injuries. The athletes will be monitored for injuries during one season and these data will be used in the third part of the research plan as described below.

In the third part, based on findings of the two previous studies described above, a dynamic simulation model for the prediction of knee injuries will be developed. The already collected data from the previous steps and analysis will be used to develop the simulation model. Using specific equations, the function of the simulation model will predict the propensity of knee injuries. Based on the interaction among the variables expressed in the CLD a perception/prediction of the likelihood of knee injury will be provided. Furthermore, through the model it would be able to see the changes in the variable of interest that is knee injuries if testist to alter the values of a variable.

The last step includes the validation and calibration of the model. The aim of this step is to test how close the estimation for knee injuries of the model were to the incidence of knee injuries occurred during the season.

It is expected that the members of sports medicine community use the results of the study to predict knee injuries and gain insight of the key risk factors, as well as their interrelationships and effectively plan injury prevention programs and strategies

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

99

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aígio, Greece, 25100
        • University of Patras

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

17 years to 40 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

100 healthy athletes (17-40 years old) that participate in sports that include activities such as jumping, slowing down, and change of direction by pivoting such as football, basketball, and handball

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy professional athletes that participate in team sports (football, handball, basketball)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Injured athletes

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Score in landing error scoring system test
Time Frame: Baseline test
The landing technique of the athletes will be assessed using the test landing error scoring system. The LESS assesses the quality of movement during landing based on a 19-point continuous scale. A maximum score of 19 can be reached; the lower the score, the better the landing technique.
Baseline test
BMI (kg/m^2)
Time Frame: Baseline test
Baseline test
Leg length (cm)
Time Frame: Baseline test
Baseline test
Tibia length (cm)
Time Frame: Baseline test
Baseline test
Demographic, history of injury, and activity level
Time Frame: Baseline test
Using questionnaires data will be collected regarding the age, level of competition, details of previous injuries, playing position, training volume
Baseline test
Passive range of motion with Goniometer
Time Frame: Baseline test
It will be assessed the range of motion for the following movements: Hip external/internal rotation, knee hyperextension, and ankle dorsiflexion
Baseline test
Core muscle endurance
Time Frame: Baseline test
It will be measured the time in seconds until exhaustion to maintain the position in the following tests: side bridge test, prone bridge test, extensor endurance test
Baseline test
Muscle strength
Time Frame: Baseline test
Muscle strength examination with hand held dynamometer for the following muscles: quadriceps, hamstrings and hip abductors
Baseline test
Balance
Time Frame: Baseline test
Assessment of the balance with the pressure platform during the task of single leg drop jump
Baseline test
Muscle activation
Time Frame: Baseline test
Assessment of quadriceps and hamstrings muscle activation with surface electromyography in the single leg hop for distance
Baseline test
Incidence of knee injuries
Time Frame: 1 year
Collection data through questionnaire for knee injuries of the athletes during the season that cause at least one-day time loss from game or training
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of other lower extremity injuries
Time Frame: 1 year
Collection data through questionnaire for other lower limb injuries of the athletes during the season that cause at least one-day time loss from game or training
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Sofia A. Xergia, University of Patras
  • Study Director: Elias Tsepis, University of Patras
  • Study Director: Konstantinos Fousekis, University of Patras
  • Principal Investigator: Charis Tsarbou, University of Patras
  • Study Director: George Papageorgiou, European University Cyprus
  • Principal Investigator: Nikolaos I. Liveris, University of Patras

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 22, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 22, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 15, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 19, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 24, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 20, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 12756

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sports Physical Therapy

3
Subscribe