- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05479929
Work of Breathing Assessment in Triage Scale
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Investigators will enroll a convenience sample of consenting patients who present to the emergency department with a chief complaint related to respiratory symptoms, including shortness of breath, cough, difficulty breathing, hypoxemia, or any other respiratory related complaint.
Following consent and in a blinded fashion, the nurse & emergency physician will be asked to evaluate the patient's work of breathing into three subjective categories: mild, moderate, or severe. The two evaluators will not be aware of the others evaluation of the patient. Evaluators will also be asked to predict the patients likely need for intervention & disposition.
Subsequently, investigators will perform a chart review to determine the patient's clinical interventions, outcomes, and dispositions, and evaluate the assessment of the patients work of breathing.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Texas
-
Corpus Christi, Texas, United States, 78405
- CHRISTUS Spohn Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years of age of older
- Presenting to the emergency department with a chief complaint of any type of respiratory symptom.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Under 18 years of age
- Refusal to consent to study
- Incarcerated patients
- Pregnant patients
- Unable to complete survey due to clinical instability, severe pain, or disorientation determined by a study physician.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Patients with Respiratory Symptoms
The Canadian Triage Assessment Scale (CTAS) will be assessed via patient survey form and electronic chart review.
|
The CTAS incorporates work of breathing into a subjective measurement in its assessment of patients and triaged.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Inter-rater agreement between nurses and emergency physicians for the respiratory component of the Canadian Assessment Scale (CTAS)
Time Frame: 24 months
|
The CTAS is utilized to qualitatively define work of breathing as severe, moderate, or mild.
Kappa will be calculated to assess inter-rater reliability
|
24 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Christopher Durand, DO, CHRISTUS Health
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Rui P, Kang K, Albert M. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2013 Emergency Department Summary Tables. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ahcd/nhamcs_emergency/2013_ed_web_tables.pdf.
- Hutchinson A, Pickering A, Williams P, Bland JM, Johnson MJ. Breathlessness and presentation to the emergency department: a survey and clinical record review. BMC Pulm Med. 2017 Mar 20;17(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12890-017-0396-4.
- Murray M, Bullard M, Grafstein E; CTAS Natioanal Working Group; CEDIS National Working Group. Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale implementation guidelines. CJEM. 2004 Nov;6(6):421-7. No abstract available.
- Horeczko T, Enriquez B, McGrath NE, Gausche-Hill M, Lewis RJ. The Pediatric Assessment Triangle: accuracy of its application by nurses in the triage of children. J Emerg Nurs. 2013 Mar;39(2):182-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2011.12.020. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
- Jimenez JG, Murray MJ, Beveridge R, Pons JP, Cortes EA, Garrigos JB, Ferre MB. Implementation of the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) in the Principality of Andorra: Can triage parameters serve as emergency department quality indicators? CJEM. 2003 Sep;5(5):315-22.
- Alquraini M, Awad E, Hijazi R. Reliability of Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) in Saudi Arabia. Int J Emerg Med. 2015 Dec;8(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12245-015-0080-5. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
- Paniagua N, Elosegi A, Duo I, Fernandez A, Mojica E, Martinez-Indart L, Mintegi S, Benito J. Initial Asthma Severity Assessment Tools as Predictors of Hospitalization. J Emerg Med. 2017 Jul;53(1):10-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.03.021. Epub 2017 Apr 14.
- Roussos C, Koutsoukou A. Respiratory failure. Eur Respir J Suppl. 2003 Nov;47:3s-14s. doi: 10.1183/09031936.03.00038503.
- Beveridge R, Ducharme J, Janes L, Beaulieu S, Walter S. Reliability of the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale: interrater agreement. Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Aug;34(2):155-9. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(99)70223-4.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2020-195
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- ICF
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.