Investigating Hearing Aid Frequency Response Curves

March 10, 2025 updated by: Sonova AG
Internal research on the manufacturer's hearing aid products has idenitfied areas in which the investigators can improve the hearing aid frequency response curve. This study aims to investigate the current freqeuncy response curve in the manufacturer's products to variations of these curves to determine if hearing aid users prefer the variations over the manufacturer's standard curve.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Internal testing has identified areas in which the investigators can improve the performance of the manufacturer's hearing aid products. This should potentially lead to increased hearing aid user satisfaction due to an improvement in sound quality. However, the investigators are currently unsure if implementing these new frequency response curves will be preferred by the manufacturer's clients. Therefore, a study is proposed in which hearing aid users will compare the manufacturer's current frequency response curve to variations made to the curve and determine which one they prefer while listening to live speech/music or while streaming speech/music.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

33

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Kitchener, Ontario, Canada, N2E 1Y6
        • Sonova - Kitchener

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • N2 - N4 Hearing losses
  • Health Outer ear
  • no visible congenital or traumatic deformity of the outer ear
  • Symmetrical hearing loss - no air-bone gap greater than 10 dB at all 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz.
  • Ability to answer questions and repeat sentences
  • No history of problematic tinnitus or pain/discomfort from loud sounds
  • No history of active drainage from the ears in the past 90 daysInformed consent as documented by signature
  • Willingness to wear different styles of couplings
  • Willingness to wear binaural fitting
  • Experienced Users = more than 3 months of hearing aid experience. If not more than 3 months, they will be considered a new user (Experience will not exclude them from study, only will be used to categorize them)
  • Ability to travel throughout facility

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications to the medical device (MD) in this study (e.g. known hypersensitivity or allergy to the investigational products)
  • Limited mobility/not able to come to the scheduled visit
  • Inability to produce reliable hearing test results
  • History of active drainage from the ear in the previous 90 days
  • Abnormal appearance of the eardrum and ear canal.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Participants with Hearing Loss
Individuals with hearing loss that meet the candidacy to wear hearing aids. All interventions are associated with the fitting of binaural hearing aids with various coupling methods. All participants will be assessed under all interventions.
Our current hearing aids which will be programmed to our standard frequency response curve.
Hearing aids that will have the frequency response curve adjusted and fit to the participant's hearing loss.
Hearing aids that will have the frequency response curve adjusted and fit to the participant's hearing loss.
Hearing aids that will have the frequency response curve adjusted and fit to the participant's hearing loss.
Hearing aids that will have the frequency response curve adjusted and fit to the participant's hearing loss.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Streaming Sound Quality Ratings
Time Frame: 60 minutes

Pre-filtered sound samples (based on frequency response curves) will be presented via a paired comparison task in which participants will determine which sound sample they prefer (i.e. better sound quality). Sound samples will be presented via hearing aids that are programmed to the participant's hearing loss.

Participant's will be presented with two samples at a time and will choose which sample they prefer. For example, if Sample A was preferred over Sample B, then Sample A gets a score of 1. If Sample B was preferred over Sample A, then Sample B gets a score of 1. At the end of the task, scores will be tallied to determine which sample was preferred the most overall. There will be 5 different samples. The minimum value for the tallied score would be 0 (the sample was not preferred at all) and the maximum value would be 8 (implying that the sample was preferred in all trials). Higher scores mean that the sample was preferred more and lowers scores mean the sample was not preferred.

60 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sound Quality Rating - Live - Counts
Time Frame: 60 minutes

Participants will be asked to wear hearing aids and as they listen to speech in noise. They will be asked to toggle between two hearing aid programs and will be asked to make ratings in the lab and outdoors.

Similar to Outcome 1, scores will be tallied at the end to see which program of the two was preferred more in the different listening environments. Scores can range from 0 (the program was not preferred at all) to unlimited (dependent on the numbers of trials run and samples tested). Higher scores will indicate that the program was preferred more than the other program and lowers scores mean the program was not preferred when compared to the other program.

60 minutes
Sound Quality Rating - Live - Preferences
Time Frame: 60 minutes

Participants will be asked to wear hearing aids and as they listen to speech in noise. They will be asked to toggle between two hearing aid programs and determine which program they prefer to listen to.

Similar to Outcome 1, scores will be tallied at the end to see which program of the two was preferred more in the different listening environments. Scores can range from 0 (the program was not preferred at all) to unlimited (dependent on the numbers of trials run and samples tested). Highers scores will indicate that the program was preferred more than the other program and lowers scores mean the program was not preferred when compared to the other program.

60 minutes
US Matrix Test in Quiet - SRT
Time Frame: 30 Minutes
Oldenburg Sentence Test (OLSA) sentences were presented to participants while they were aided under the standard curve, aided under curve #4, and unaided. Participants are presented with sentences from a loudspeaker placed infront of them and asked to repeat what they heard. Correct repitition results in the next sentence to be presented at a lower sound level. Incorrect repetition results in an increase in presentation level for the next sentence. 20 sentences are presented for each conidition (i.e., unaided, aided with the standard curve, and aided under curve #4). Speech Recognition Threshold at 50% (SRT50) correctness scores were calculated and compared amongst the three conditions. SRT50 is measured in decibel (dB) which is a unit on scale. The scale has no upper or lower limits, however lower scores indicate better performance.
30 Minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jinyu Qian, PhD, Sonova AG

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 24, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 11, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

January 11, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 26, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

August 30, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe