Intrathecal Versus Intravenous Dexmedetomidine in Prostate Transurethral Resection

September 2, 2022 updated by: Laila Elahwal, Tanta University

The Effect of Intrathecal Versus Intravenous Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Analgesia in Transurethral Resection of The Prostate

This study was conducted to compare the effects of intrathecal versus intravenous dexmedetomidine administration in patients undergoing Transurethral resection of the prostate under spinal anesthesia.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Multiple prostatic pathologies become evident in the elderly males. Of them, benign prostatic hyperplasia is one of the most prevalent issues in aging men and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) still represents the standard surgical treatment.

Most transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) procedures are performed under spinal anesthesia. Spinal anesthesia has many advantages including, easy application, low cost, decreasing the risk of aspiration, decreasing intraoperative bleeding, eliminating the need for mechanical ventilation together with the decreased risk of intraoperative cardiac events or post-operative hypoxic episode.

The management of post-operative pain following spinal anesthesia using a short-acting anesthetic still constitutes a major problem for anesthesiologists and pain physicians. However, the duration and efficacy of spinal anesthesia could be improved by adjuvants.

Dexmedetomidine is an alpha 2 receptor agonist that have antinociceptive action for both visceral and somatic pain. At low doses, it has sedative and hypnotic effects without having a negative impact on respiration. Multiple studies have reported that intrathecal and intravenous administration of this drug could prolong the duration of spinal anesthesia and post-operative analgesia.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

75

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • ElGharbia
      • Tanta, ElGharbia, Egypt, 31511
        • Recruiting
        • Surgical Intensive Care and Pain Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Cases aged between 50 and 70 years
  • Having class I or II according to the American society of anesthesiologists (ASA)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cases with heart block
  • Dysrhythmia
  • Contraindications for spinal anesthesia
  • Known allergy to the study medications
  • Classified as ASA class > II
  • Alpha 2 agonist or antagonist therapy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Control group
Cases will be subjected to spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine 10 mg.
The cases will be subjected to spinal anesthesia with a 3 ml volume (2.5 ml of hyperbaric bupivacaine 10 mg in addition to 0.5 normal saline). 50 ml of normal saline was infused over a ten-minute period, followed by 200 ml infusion till the end of operation.
Experimental: Intrathecal group
Cases will be subjected to the same anesthetic mixture as controls with adding dexmedetomidine 5 μg.
The cases will be subjected to the same anesthetic mixture as controls with adding dexmedetomidine 5 μg in the saline component. 50 ml of normal saline was infused over a ten-minute period, followed by 200 ml infusion till the end of operation.
Experimental: Intravenous group
Cases will receive hyperbaric bupivacaine (10 mg), in addition to IV dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg loading dose, followed by 0.4 μg/kg/h maintenance dose).
The intravenous group will receive 2.5 ml of hyperbaric bupivacaine (10 mg), in addition to intravenous dexmedetomidine, which will be started at 1 μg/kg loading dose diluted in 50 ml saline administered within 10 min, followed by maintenance at a 0.4 μg/kg/h dose diluted in 200 ml saline till the end of the procedure.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to first analgesic request
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Time to first analgesic request will be recorded
24 hours postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The onset of sensory
Time Frame: 24 hours Postoperatively
Time to reach T7 sensory block will be recorded
24 hours Postoperatively
The degree of motor block
Time Frame: 24 hours Postoperatively
The degree of motor block will be assessed using the modified Bromage Score. Grade 0 No motor block Grade 1 Inability to raise extended leg, able to move knees and feet Grade 2 Inability to raise extended leg and move knee, able to move feet Grade 3 Complete motor block of the lower limbs.
24 hours Postoperatively
Sedation level
Time Frame: Intraoperativley
Patients level of sedation will be assessed via Ramsay sedation score. This score is numbered from 1 to 6, based on patient responsiveness.
Intraoperativley
Total analgesic requirements
Time Frame: 48 hours Postoperatively
Total analgesic requirements will be recorded
48 hours Postoperatively
The incidence of side effects
Time Frame: 48 hours Postoperatively
The incidence of side effects including (bradycardia, hypotension, nausea, vomiting, and pruritis) will be recorded..
48 hours Postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 29, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 29, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 29, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 2, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 6, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 34141/9/20

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All information will be available under a reasonable request from the corresponding author

IPD Sharing Time Frame

One year after the completion of the study

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Analgesia

Clinical Trials on Control group

Subscribe