Healthy ReStart Intervention to Improve Health and Functioning

September 11, 2025 updated by: Judith A. Cook, University of Illinois at Chicago
This study tests an intervention that uses health coaching, motivational interviewing, positive psychology, and online wellness tools to help adults with mental illness return to active lives after major disruptions such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study is testing the efficacy of a brief intervention delivered to adults with mental illness by trained health coaches, designed to help recipients engage in health and mental health self-management, while setting goals to return to an active life after major disruptions such as a pandemic. Adult clients of collaborating community mental health agencies are randomly assigned to the intervention plus services as usual, versus services as usual alone. They are assessed at baseline and 6 months later. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models are used to assess the primary outcome of changes in mental and physical health, functioning, perceived competence for life self-management, and mental health recovery. Also examined are study condition differences in self-advocacy skills, access to services, and disruptions from COVID-19.

Hypothesis 1: Compared to services as usual (SAU), intervention recipients will report better health, well-being, and service use.

Hypothesis 2: Compared to SAU, intervention recipients will have more perceived competence and self-advocacy.

Hypothesis 3: Healthy ReStart recipients will report high levels of satisfaction with the intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Judith A Cook, Ph.D.
  • Phone Number: 312-355-3921
  • Email: jcook@uic.edu

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 and older
  • Diagnosis of serious mental illness defined as a DSM 5 psychiatric disorder and moderate to severe functional impairment
  • Membership in a collaborating community mental health agency
  • Access to the Internet for online meetings
  • Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A cognitive impairment preventing informed consent
  • Unable to communicate in English

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
Subjects receive an intervention with 4 components: establishing a working alliance with a health coach, completing an online inventory to assess personal wellness in eight life areas, developing a Restart plan that includes personalized life goals, and follow-along with a health coach to address barriers to goal attainment and to reinforce achievement.
In addition to receiving mental health services as usual, subjects receive services from health coaches over a four-month period to assist them in creating a Restart plan and attaining related life goals.
Active Comparator: Services as Usual
Subjects receive mental health services as usual.
Subjects receive mental health services as usual.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Perceived Competence
Time Frame: Study entry (pre-intervention), 6 months post-study entry
Change in participants' feelings of competence about their ability to improve their lives and follow through on their life goals as measured by the Perceived Competence scale. This 4-item scale using a 7-point Likert response format ranging from "not at all true" to "very true." The minimum value is 4 and the maximum is 28, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.
Study entry (pre-intervention), 6 months post-study entry
Change in Depressive Symptoms
Time Frame: Study entry (pre-intervention), 6 months post-study entry
Change in symptoms of depression and anhedonia is measured by the Patient Health Questionniare-9. Total score ranges from 0 to 27 with higher values indicating greater likelihood of depressive disorder. Total score is calculated by adding the 9 item scores.
Study entry (pre-intervention), 6 months post-study entry
Change in Anxiety Symptoms
Time Frame: Study entry (pre-intervention), 6 months post-study entry
Change in anxiety symptoms is measured by The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item Questionnaire. Total score ranges from 0 to 21 with higher values indicating greater likelihood of generalized anxiety disorder. Total score is calculated by adding the 7 item scores.
Study entry (pre-intervention), 6 months post-study entry
Change in Coping Mastery
Time Frame: Study entry (pre-intervention), 6 months post-study entry
Change in subjects' sense of personal control over important life outcomes is measured by the Coping Mastery Scale. Higher values equal better coping mastery. Minimum=2 and maximum=49.
Study entry (pre-intervention), 6 months post-study entry
Change in Empowerment
Time Frame: Study entry (pre-intervention), 6 months post-study entry
Change in empowerment is measure by the Empowerment Scale. This 28-item instrument designed to measure subjective feelings of empowerment via self-report in which respondents answer questions on a four-point scale ranging from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree. The minimum score is 28 and the maximum is 112, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.
Study entry (pre-intervention), 6 months post-study entry
Change in Recovery
Time Frame: Study entry (pre-intervention), 6 months post-study entry
Change in recovery is measured by the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS). Recovery is a psychosocial outcome assessed via patient self-ratings on a 41-item scale using a 5-point Likert-Response format ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree." The minimum value for the RAS is 41 and the maximum is 205, with higher scores indicating a better outcome. Dimensions of recovery include personal confidence and hope, willingness to ask for help, goal and success orientation, reliance on others, and not being dominated by one's residual psychiatric symptoms.
Study entry (pre-intervention), 6 months post-study entry

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Physical and Mental Functioning
Time Frame: Study entry (pre-intervention), 6 months post-study entry
Change in physical and mental functioning is measured by the Veterans Rand 12. This measure assesses physical functioning, role limitations due to physical or mental health problems, pain, energy, mental and physical health, and social functioning. Responses to each item create physical component and mental component summary scores. The item weights account for differences in the strength of relationships between individual items and the physical and mental component scores. Scores are standardized using a T-score metric, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10.
Study entry (pre-intervention), 6 months post-study entry
Change in Ability to Self-Advocate
Time Frame: Study entry (pre-intervention), 6 months post-study entry
Change in the ability to advocate for oneself with behavioral health care providers is assessed by the Patient Self-Advocacy Scale, an 18-item scale with a 5-point Likert response set ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree." Dimensions include in patient knowledge, assertiveness, and potential for mindful non-adherence to treatment. Scoring involves computing the mean scale score, so therefore values range from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 5, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.
Study entry (pre-intervention), 6 months post-study entry

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 12, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 16, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 15, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2021-0125
  • 90RTHF0004-01-00 (Other Grant/Funding Number: National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe