- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05603234
Symptom Monitoring and Menopausal Symptoms
Evaluating the Effects of Symptom Monitoring on Physical & Emotional Outcomes During Menopause: A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial
A recent systematic review suggested that symptom monitoring can result in reductions in menopausal symptoms and improvements in health-related behaviours. To date, no studies have experimentally investigated whether symptom monitoring could be beneficial as an intervention for menopausal women.
One hundred menopausal women were randomised into either a Monitoring-intervention or Control group. A mixed between/ within design was employed, with group membership (i.e., Monitoring-intervention or Control) as the between-subjects component, and time (i.e., baseline and 2-weeks follow-up) as the within-subjects component. Dependent variables included symptom reductions and emotional reactions. Secondary outcomes included help-seeking, communication, medical decision-making, health awareness, self-efficacy, and health anxiety.
Study Overview
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Wales
-
Treforest, Wales, United Kingdom, CF371DL
- University of South Wales
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion criteria:
- Women
- Aged 18+
- Reporting at least 2 menopausal hot flushes per day
- Self-reported peri- or post-menopausal status.
Exclusion criteria:
- Male
- Under age 18
- Reported fewer than 2 hot flushes per day
- Does not self-report peri- or post-menopausal status.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Symptom Monitoring Intervention
This group reported their symptoms every day for 14 days.
|
Reporting symptoms each day via a symptom questionnaire
|
|
No Intervention: Control
This group did not monitor their symptoms every day for the 14 day period, however they did report their symptoms at the beginning and end of the 14 day period
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Menopausal symptom changes via the Daily Record Keeping (DRK) form
Time Frame: at baseline and after 2 weeks of symptom monitoring
|
Changes in menopausal symptom scores after 2-weeks of symptom monitoring, where reductions in symptoms would suggest a beneficial outcomes.
|
at baseline and after 2 weeks of symptom monitoring
|
|
Emotional outcomes via the Daily Record Keeping (DRK) form
Time Frame: at baseline and after 2 weeks of symptom monitoring
|
Changes in emotion scores after 2-weeks of symptom monitoring.
The DRK assesses emotional outcomes via specific emotion subscales including Negative Emotions, Positive affect, Anxiety, Depression, Loneliness.
Reductions in Negative Emotions, Anxiety, Loneliness, Depression after 2-weeks would suggest benefical effects, as would increases in Positive Affect.
|
at baseline and after 2 weeks of symptom monitoring
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Help seeking intentions
Time Frame: at baseline and after 2 weeks of symptom monitoring
|
Changes in Help Seeking Intention scores as assessed via the General Help Seeking Questionnaire (GHSQ).
Increases in GHSQ scores at 2-weeks would indicate benefical effects on help seeking behaviour.
|
at baseline and after 2 weeks of symptom monitoring
|
|
General Self Efficacy
Time Frame: at baseline and after 2 weeks of symptom monitoring
|
Changes in General Self Efficacy scores as assessed via the General Self Efficacy (GSE) scale.
Increases in GSE scores at 2-weeks would indicate beneficial effects on self efficacy.
|
at baseline and after 2 weeks of symptom monitoring
|
|
Decision making efficacy
Time Frame: at baseline after 2 weeks of symptom monitoring
|
Changes in Decision making efficacy scores as assessed via the Decision Self Efficacy (DSE) scale.
Increases in DSE scores after 2-weeks would suggest benefical effects on medical decision making.
|
at baseline after 2 weeks of symptom monitoring
|
|
Health communication
Time Frame: at baseline after 2 weeks of symptom monitoring
|
Changes in Health communication scores as assessed via the Willingness to Communicate about Health (WTCH) questionnaire.
Increases in WTCH scores after 2-weeks would suggest benefical effects on health communication.
|
at baseline after 2 weeks of symptom monitoring
|
|
Health Anxiety
Time Frame: at baseline and after 2 weeks of symptom monitoring
|
Changes in Health Anxiety scores as assessed via the Health Orientation Scale (HOS).
Reductions in Health Anxiety after 2-weeks would suggest beneficial effects.
|
at baseline and after 2 weeks of symptom monitoring
|
|
Health Consciousness
Time Frame: at baseline and after 2 weeks of symptom monitoring
|
Changes in Health Consciousness scores as assessed via the HOS.
Reductions in Health Consciousness scores after 2-weeks would suggest beneficial effects.
|
at baseline and after 2 weeks of symptom monitoring
|
|
Coping preference
Time Frame: Measured at baseline to assess whether coping preference moderated symptom monitoring outcomes
|
Monitoring/ Blunting Coping preference assessed via the Miller's Behavioural Style Scale (MBSS).
The MBSS score can be used in analyses as a continuous variable, with individuals displaying more or less monitoring coping characteristics.
Scores range from 0 (no monitoring characteristics) to 72 (high monitoring characteristics).
|
Measured at baseline to assess whether coping preference moderated symptom monitoring outcomes
|
|
Trait neuroticism
Time Frame: Measured at baseline to assess whether trait neuroticism moderated symptom monitoring outcomes
|
Trait neuroticism was assessed via the IPIP-NEO 10-item neuroticism subscale.
This scale ranges from 10 (low trait neuroticism) to 50 (high trait neuroticism).
|
Measured at baseline to assess whether trait neuroticism moderated symptom monitoring outcomes
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 21059
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.