VIO Imaging for Skin Tissue Assessment (VISTA) (VISTA)

July 2, 2024 updated by: Enspectra Health

VIO Imaging for Skin Tissue Assessment (VISTA) - a Prospective, Multicenter Investigation of the VIO Device in Subjects Undergoing Routine Biopsy

To demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the VIO device in obtaining in vivo images that show tissue features including epidermis, dermis, collagen, blood vessels, and/or pigment.

To demonstrate that the tissue features identified on the images obtained with the VIO device align with the corresponding pathology images procured from the skin biopsy.

To evaluate the ability of blinded readers to correctly identify tissue features on images obtained with the VIO device.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

65

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Merced, California, United States, 95340
        • Golden State Dermatology
      • Walnut Creek, California, United States, 94598
        • Golden State Dermatology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. The subject is between 18 and 99 years of age.
  2. The subject or Legally Authorized Representative (LAR) is able and willing to provide written informed consent.
  3. The subject is planning to undergo a routine skin biopsy.
  4. The subject is willing and able to remain still for periods of up to 3 minutes to allow for image capture.
  5. The subject or LAR has sufficient mental capacity to understand the informed consent form (ICF) and comply with the protocol requirements.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The subject has a general health condition or systemic disease that in the opinion of the physician, precludes them from trial participation.
  2. The subject has a known allergy or increased skin sensitivity to silicone, adhesives, or glycerin.
  3. The subject's lesion targeted for biopsy:

    1. Is located on the palms of the hands, soles of the feet, fingernails, or toenails.
    2. Has dense hair that will not be removed prior to the skin biopsy.
    3. Has clinically significant abraded or ulcerated skin with or without discharge.
    4. Is associated with a wound or skin condition that in the opinion of the physician precludes them from participation
    5. Is located in mucosal tissue (i.e., oral, nasal, etc.).
    6. Is on tattooed skin.
    7. Is on a skin formation too tortuous for the investigational device to access (e.g., skin tags.)
    8. Is located in the periorbital region or directly on the eyelid.

      -

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: VIO Imaging
Subjects with skin conditions that are candidates for biopsy
Skin conditions that are candidates for skin biopsies

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparative Reader Percentage Agreement
Time Frame: 8 months post-enrollment completion
This outcome measured the % agreement and validation of specific tissue features on VIO images in comparison to gold standard pathology images between N=3 Comparative Readers (CRs). "CRs" were study investigators that were selected based on their experience and medical qualifications. 100% agreement and validation between the CRs was required to proceed to the next study phase.
8 months post-enrollment completion
Blinded Reader Percentage Agreement
Time Frame: 8 months post-enrollment completion
This outcome measured the % agreement between N=3 Blinded Readers (BRs) of their assessment of VIO images in comparison to the answer key developed from the Comparative Reader validation. "BRs" were study investigators that were selected based on their experience and medical qualifications. >90% agreement was required to proceed to the next study phase.
8 months post-enrollment completion
Safety / Adverse Events
Time Frame: 7 +/- 3 days after VIO imaging
Safety will be assessed as the incidence of all adverse events (analyzed by severity, seriousness, and relationship to the device and procedure) that occur through the 7-day follow-up period.
7 +/- 3 days after VIO imaging

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Inter-Reader Percentage Agreement
Time Frame: 8 months post-enrollment completion
This outcome measured the inter-reader % agreement between N=3 Blinded Readers (BRs) during image analysis. Minimum 90% agreement was required to proceed to the next study phase.
8 months post-enrollment completion
Evaluation of Secondary Histopathology Characteristics
Time Frame: 8 months post-enrollment completion
This outcome measured the % agreement between N=3 Blinded Readers (BRs) of their assessment of secondary histopathology characteristics in VIO images in comparison to the answer key developed from the Comparative Reader validation. >90% agreement was required to proceed to the next study phase.
8 months post-enrollment completion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael Wang, MD, FAAD, Golden State Dermatology

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 20, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 11, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

August 11, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 26, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 11, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

November 17, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 25, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 2, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CR-30096
  • 2R44CA221591-03 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe