Efficacy and Accuracy of Combined Localization Versus Single Localization in Non-palpable Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Therapy

July 1, 2024 updated by: Chang Gong, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University

Efficacy and Accuracy of Combined Localization Versus Single Localization in Non-palpable Breast Cancer After Neo-adjuvant Therapy : a Prospective Randomized Control Trial.

The standard method for localizing non-palpable breast cancer is currently clip localization, its positive margin rate still remains around 20-50%. This study aims to compare the accuracy and efficacy of single vs. combined breast tissue markers in localizing non-palpable breast cancer.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

110

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510120
        • Recruiting
        • Sun Yat-sen University Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. female patients, age≥18 year
  2. A score of ≥ 2 on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale
  3. Patients pathologically diagnosed with breast cancer by core-needle biopsy, received neoadjuvant treatment and the lesion becomes non-palpable before enrollment.
  4. Patients are willing to undergo breast conserving surgery and have no contraindications to breast conserving surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inflammatory breast cancer or Paget's disease
  2. Breast deformities and other conditions that impact breast conservation success rate
  3. Patients with contraindications to breast-conserving surgery, as well as those with systemic diseases, mental disorders, or other subjective reasons that may affect their ability to participate in the trial. Patients with severe bleeding disorders or coagulation disorders were also excluded.
  4. Pregnancy or lactation
  5. Patients with hook-wire, radioactive 125I seed or other localization techniques in the breast cancer lesions before enrollment
  6. Patients with stage IV diseases or unresectable lesions in either breast
  7. Patients combined with other diseases that may affect survival
  8. Patients with multicentric breast cancer lesions or lesions > 5 cm in diameter on imaging examinations
  9. Patients who have previously undergone radical mastectomy for ipsilateral breast cancer or chest wall radiotherapy
  10. Patients with history of ipsilateral breast cancer radical mastectomy or chest wall radiotherapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: patients after neoadjuvant therapy-combined localization
Positioning guide wire and marker clip in the center of the breast lesion
Active Comparator: patients after neoadjuvant therapy-single localization
Positioning marker clip in the center of the breast lesion

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Marginal positive rate
Time Frame: up to 3 months
Proportion of patients with positive margin (intraoperative freezing and postoperative pathological margin tissue showing cancer)
up to 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
IDFS
Time Frame: 2 years, 3 years, and 5 years
Time from surgery to the first occurrence of local, distant disease recurrence, or death.
2 years, 3 years, and 5 years
Re-operation rate.
Time Frame: up to 3 months
the proportion of patients which have a positive margin and requires a re-operation
up to 3 months
The proportion of breast-conserving surgery.
Time Frame: up to 3 months
It refers to the proportion of patients who have successfully undergone breast-conserving surgery.
up to 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 16, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 2, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 3, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe