Implementing the NYU Electronic Patient Visit Assessment (ePVA) for Head and Neck Cancer In Rural and Urban Populations

July 2, 2026 updated by: Janet Van Cleave, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
The PI and the research team developed the New York University (NYU) Electronic Patient Visit Assessment (ePVA) for head and neck cancer (HNC) as a patient-reported outcome measure (PRO) for the early detection of uncontrolled symptoms. The ePVA is digital patient-reported symptom monitoring system, providing actionable information at point-of-care that enables clinicians to provide real-time interventions. The study aims to advance the science of cancer care delivery by testing the effectiveness of the ePVA as a digital patient-reported monitoring system for patients with HNC in real-world settings and identify implementation strategies that optimize the effectiveness of the ePVA in diverse rural and urban settings. The study hypothesis is that participants assigned to the ePVA arm will have better swallowing, taste and smell, and social function than participants assigned to usual care arm at 4 weeks after completing radiation therapy.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

270

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Kansas
      • Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 66160
        • Recruiting
        • University of Kansas Cancer Center
        • Contact:
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10010
        • Not yet recruiting
        • NYU Meyers College of Nursing
        • Contact:
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19111
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria (Patient Participants):

  • Individuals with histologically diagnosed head and neck cancer (HNC) undergoing curative radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy
  • English or Spanish speaking

Inclusion Criteria (Clinician Participants):

  • Clinicians (i.e., physicians, nurses, dentists, physician assistants, social workers, nutritionists, speech swallow therapists) caring for patients with head and neck cancer at the participating institutions

Exclusion Criteria (Patient and Clinician Participants):

  • Any medical condition that could limit the participant's ability to provide informed consent and complete the questionnaires.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Usual Care
Usual care encompasses pre-treatment, on treatment, and post-treatment care. Pre-treatment care includes education of patients on the treatment plan. On-treatment care includes daily monitoring by a nurse in the radiation therapy (RT) department, weekly on-treatment visits with the RT nurse practitioner and radiation oncologist, and weekly visits with medical oncology nurse practitioners and medical oncologists for patients receiving RT plus chemotherapy. Post-treatment care includes follow-up visits with HNC clinicians (i.e., surgeon, medical oncologist, oral maxillofacial surgeons, and radiation oncologist) to assess the patient's cancer status and identify the patient's acute and long-term symptoms. The clinician's decisions on radiologic exams and referrals to appropriate specialist services, including dental care, are based on the patient's cancer status and symptoms.
Experimental: NYU Electronic Patient Visit Assessment (ePVA) plus Usual Care
The NYU Electronic Patient Visit Assessment (ePVA) for head and neck cancer is a digital patient-reported symptom monitoring system, providing actionable information at point-of-care that enables clinicians to provide real-time interventions. Patients access the ePVA through a web link and complete the survey questions within 10 minutes on digital devices (e.g., smart phones, laptops, or digital devices provided by the clinic).
Usual care encompasses pre-treatment, on treatment, and post-treatment care. Pre-treatment care includes education of patients on the treatment plan. On-treatment care includes daily monitoring by a nurse in the radiation therapy (RT) department, weekly on-treatment visits with the RT nurse practitioner and radiation oncologist, and weekly visits with medical oncology nurse practitioners and medical oncologists for patients receiving RT plus chemotherapy. Post-treatment care includes follow-up visits with HNC clinicians (i.e., surgeon, medical oncologist, oral maxillofacial surgeons, and radiation oncologist) to assess the patient's cancer status and identify the patient's acute and long-term symptoms. The clinician's decisions on radiologic exams and referrals to appropriate specialist services, including dental care, are based on the patient's cancer status and symptoms.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Head and neck cancer (HNC) symptoms as assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaires (QLQ)
Time Frame: 4 weeks after completing radiation therapy
The EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35 will be used to measure head and neck cancer symptoms, such as social function, senses of taste and smell, and swallowing. The scores will be summed and then transformed to a single score ranging from 0=Best to 100=Worst.
4 weeks after completing radiation therapy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain as assessed by EORTC QLQ-H&N35 Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)
Time Frame: 4 weeks after completing radiation therapy
The EORTC QLQ-H&N35 will be used to assess pain. The score will be summed and then transformed to a single score ranging from 0=Best to 100=Worst.
4 weeks after completing radiation therapy
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) as assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30 Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)
Time Frame: 4 weeks after completing radiation therapy
The EORTC QLQ-H&N35 will be used to assess Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). The score will be summed and then transformed to a single score ranging from 0=Best to 100=Worst.
4 weeks after completing radiation therapy
Acute Care Services Use as assessed by number of acute care visits
Time Frame: 4 weeks after completing radiation therapy
Acute Care Services Use is the use of services delivered in acute care settings, such as feeding tube placements, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations.
4 weeks after completing radiation therapy
Acute Care Services Use as assessed by number of days of using acute care
Time Frame: 4 weeks after completing radiation therapy
Acute Care Services Use is the use of services delivered in acute care settings, such as feeding tube placements, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations.
4 weeks after completing radiation therapy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Janet H. Van Cleave, PhD, RN, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth Houston)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 25, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 1, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 1, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 8, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 2, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HSC-SN-23-0784

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe