- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06040580
Can we Use Resting-state fMRI and CSD Fiber Tractography for Presurgical Mapping?
The Use of Resting State fMRI and CSD Tractography for Pre-operative Brain Mapping: a Cross-sectional Study
Study Overview
Status
Detailed Description
This study aims to prospectively investigate and validate the application of resting state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) and High angular resolution diffusion imaging (HARDI), particularly constrained spherical deconvolution (CSD) tractography, in presurgical functional and structural brain mapping for the purposes of neurosurgical planning, navigation and risk assessment. The main objective is to determine whether rs-fMRI and CSD tractography are capable of replacing task based fMRI (tb-fMRI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) based fiber tractography (FT) using the fiber assignment by continuous tracking (FACT) algorithm for mapping the sensory-motor, language, visual, as well as higher cognitive functional and structural networks of the brain in patients with brain pathology amenable for surgical intervention. This research question will be investigated by acquiring tb-fMRI and rs-fMRI, as well as HARDI data for presurgical patients. The routine workflow of presurgical planning and risk assessment using tb-fMRI and DTI FT will be followed and used for the initial planning. Previous studies have revealed a high degree of concordance between rs-fMRI and tb-fMRI[1]-[5] as well as between CSD and DTI FT[6]-[8], but drew such conclusions from relatively small sample sizes. The aim is to incorporate the rs-fMRI and CSD results into the presurgical planning process albeit with more weight assigned to the tb-fMRI and DTI results. The study population will consist of 10 normal controls for MR imaging optimization purposes only, 150 presurgical patients from the UZ Leuven imaging department regardless of the exact type of pathology (space occupying lesions, epilepsy, vascular malformations etc.).
As tb-fMRI has previously been validated versus the gold standard of functional mapping, electrical cortical stimulation (ECS), while rs-fMRI has previously been validated against tb-fMRI. The same has been done comparing DTI and CSD. To our knowledge however, a comparative study with such a large and diverse study population attempting to cross validate all these modalities against the gold standard has not yet been done.
Image acquisition acceleration methods, such as parallel imaging (PI), simultaneous multislice acquisitions (SMS) and compressed sensing (CS) will be used whenever feasible. These acceleration methods can potentially be exploited to improve fMRI, and dMRI data quality as well as shorten acquisition time. In the case of fMRI, PI and SMS can be used to increase temporal resolution, temporal signal to noise ratio and even spatial resolution. dMRI stands to benefit from such techniques by increasing directional and/or spatial resolution.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Vlaams Brabant
-
Leuven, Vlaams Brabant, Belgium, 3000
- UZ Leuven
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Patients with any brain pathology amenable to surgery who have not undergone previous resective surgery, regardless of age, gender or type of disease.
Healthy volunteers are only included for scan optimization puproses.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Stable clinical condition
- Cooperative and able to perform the fMRI tasks in question
- In need of preoperative MRI mapping scans
Exclusion Criteria:
- Absolute contraindications to MRI
- Previously underwent resective brain surgery
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
|---|
|
Patients
Preoperative patients in need of brain surgery for varying brain pathology who require presurgical brain mapping with MRI (fMRI, and dMRI)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Differences in accuracy between CSD and DTI fiber tractography as well as resting-state and task-based fMRI
Time Frame: Through phase 1 recruitment completion (about 2 years from start of recruitment)
|
A comparative analysis examining differences in accuracy measures between different fMRI and dMRI tractography methods, namely resting-state fMRI v. task-based fMRI and DTI v CSD diffusion tractography using intraoperative direct electrical stimulation results as the ground truth
|
Through phase 1 recruitment completion (about 2 years from start of recruitment)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Radwan AM, Sunaert S, Schilling K, Descoteaux M, Landman BA, Vandenbulcke M, Theys T, Dupont P, Emsell L. An atlas of white matter anatomy, its variability, and reproducibility based on constrained spherical deconvolution of diffusion MRI. Neuroimage. 2022 Jul 1;254:119029. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119029. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
- Radwan AM, Emsell L, Blommaert J, Zhylka A, Kovacs S, Theys T, Sollmann N, Dupont P, Sunaert S. Virtual brain grafting: Enabling whole brain parcellation in the presence of large lesions. Neuroimage. 2021 Apr 1;229:117731. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117731. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- S61759
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Epilepsy
-
NaviFUS CorporationTaipei Veterans General Hospital, TaiwanCompletedDrug Resistant Epilepsy | Epilepsy, Drug Resistant | Intractable Epilepsy | Refractory Epilepsy | Drug Refractory Epilepsy | Epilepsy, Drug Refractory | Epilepsy, Intractable | Medication Resistant EpilepsyTaiwan
-
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation...Active, not recruitingEpilepsies, Partial | Intractable Epilepsy | Focal Epilepsy | Refractory Epilepsy | Epilepsy Intractable | Epilepsy in Children | Epilepsy, FocalUnited Kingdom
-
University of British ColumbiaTerminatedJuvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy | Childhood Absence Epilepsy | Juvenile Absence EpilepsyCanada
-
Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityRecruiting
-
Oslo University HospitalCompletedEpilepsy | Generalized Epilepsy | Focal EpilepsyNorway
-
University Hospital, LilleCompletedFocal Epilepsy | Epilepsy IntractableFrance
-
Institute of Child HealthGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation TrustNot yet recruitingEpilepsy Intractable | Epilepsy in Children
-
Xuanwu Hospital, BeijingPeking University; Beijing Tiantan Hospital; Qilu Hospital of Shandong University and other collaboratorsRecruitingEpilepsy, Drug ResistantChina
-
Aston UniversityBirmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation TrustEnrolling by invitationEpilepsy in Children | Epilepsy in Youth | Epilepsy (Treatment Refractory)United Kingdom
-
LivaNovaWithdrawnEpilepsy, Tonic-ClonicBelgium