- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06050850
Healthy Weight Intervention Families During ALL Treatment: NOURISH-ALL (NOURISH-ALL)
A Healthy Weight Intervention for Family Stress During the Early Phases of ALL Treatment: NOURISH-ALL
The purpose of this study is to conduct a single arm pilot of the NOURISH-ALL (Nourishing Our Understanding of Role modeling to Improve Support and Health in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia) intervention focused on three components of participant engagement. This is a single arm intervention study that involves participation in a 6-session family intervention and three time points of multimethod data collection. The primary outcome is participant engagement, measured as recruitment, retention, and intended dose received.
This study will be conducted over 5 years in three phases:
- Aim 1a: Adapting the NOURISH-ALL Intervention for Families of Youth with ALL (Year 1)
- Aim 1b: Iteratively Refining the NOURISH-ALL Intervention (Year 2)
- Aim 2: Pilot Single-Arm Trial of NOURISH-ALL Focused on Participant Engagement (Years 3-5)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The long-term goal of this work is to establish an efficacious family-based health promotion intervention that curbs excessive weight gain among youth with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) by integrating support for family coping with stress during the early phases of treatment.
The objectives of the current study are to adapt an existing family-based health promotion intervention, NOURISH-T, to meet the needs of families of youth in the early phases of ALL treatment (NOURISH-ALL) and (2) assess three key components of engagement in preparation for a fully powered efficacy trial.
NOURISH-T is a 6-session family-based health promotion intervention that has demonstrated improved physical activity (PA), dietary intake, and weight among youth who are cancer survivors. Guided by the ORBIT Model of Behavioral Intervention Development, this study will modify NOURISH-T to fit the early ALL treatment context through a multi-stage adaptation and refinement process. Adaptations will incorporate family systems and cognitive behavioral intervention components to support healthy family coping with diagnosis and treatment stress. Additional, patient-centered adaptations will be informed by semi-structured family input around intervention content and delivery.
The central hypothesis is that this rigorous approach to adaptation will yield an intervention that is feasible, acceptable, and engaging for families of youth with ALL. By incorporating tailored strategies for health promotion during the early phases of ALL treatment, the proposed study seeks to shift clinical practice paradigms to prevent weight-related disparities in treatment outcomes.
Hypothesis:
The central hypothesis is that this rigorous approach to adaptation will yield an intervention that is feasible, acceptable, and engaging for families of youth with ALL.
Aims:
AIM 1: To (a) adapt the NOURISH-T intervention to target the early phases of ALL treatment (NOURISH-ALL) and (b) refine this ALL-tailored intervention for optimal feasibility and acceptability from the patient and family perspective. (Years 1-2) Defining the specific needs of families of youth with newly diagnosed ALL is essential to effectively adapting behavior change interventions to the early phases of ALL treatment. Refining interventions for optimal feasibility and acceptability from the family perspective is critical to successful intervention development.
Aim 1a: Intervention Adaptation. The purpose of Aim 1a is to adapt the NOURISH-T intervention to meet the specific needs of families during the early phases of ALL treatment. To achieve this goal, the study will initiate a three-step intervention adaptation process that includes (1) initial integration of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and family systems frameworks, (2) formative assessment with families of youth with ALL, and (3) formative assessment with multidisciplinary experts.
Aim 1b. Refinement to Optimize Feasibility and Acceptability. The purpose of Aim 1b is to adaptively refine NOURISH-ALL through sequential testing with individual families during the early phases of ALL treatment, with the goal of optimizing feasibility and acceptability from the family perspective. In line with the ORBIT model, the study will utilize an adaptive approach, similar to the commonly known "PDSA cycle," to maximize responsivity to individual patient/family feedback. Participants will receive NOURISH-ALL and provide feedback throughout the intervention (i.e., after each session and upon intervention completion), which will be iteratively analyzed and incorporated to improve intervention delivery for the next family.
AIM 2: To conduct an external pilot single-arm trial of NOURISH-ALL focused on three components of engagement. (Years 3-5). Pilot testing key components of engagement is critical to optimizing design and methodology of fully powered efficacy trials. The purpose of Aim 2 is to pilot a single-arm trial of the finalized NOURISH-ALL intervention in a sample of families of youth in the early phases of ALL treatment to assess recruitment, retention, and dose received. Results will directly inform the design of the fully powered randomized control trial to test intervention efficacy (R01 application to be submitted in Year 4).
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Carolyn Bates, PhD
- Phone Number: 913-588-6323
- Email: cbates4@kumc.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Kelsey M Dean
- Phone Number: (816) 652-0065
- Email: kdean@kumc.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Kansas
-
Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 66160
- University of Kansas Medical Center
-
-
Missouri
-
Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64118
- Children's Mercy Kansas City
-
Principal Investigator:
- Keith August, MD
-
Contact:
- Keith August, MD
- Phone Number: (816) 302-6801
- Email: kjaugust@cmh.edu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Children ages 2-12 years old and their primary caregiver ages 18-90
- Child diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)
- Child completed induction phase of therapy and not yet in maintenance phase of therapy
- Primary caregiver and child English language proficient
- Primary caregiver able to provide permission for child to participate in research
- Primary caregiver identifies as being involved with child's oncology care
- Primary caregiver lives with child at least 50% of the time
- Primary oncology provider confirms child is eligible to participate
Exclusion Criteria:
- Primary oncology provider identifies safety concerns regarding the child's participation in the study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Aim 2: Pilot Single-Arm Trial of NOURISH-ALL Focused on Participant Engagement (Years 3-5)
Pilot testing key components of engagement is critical to optimizing design and methodology of fully powered efficacy trials.
The purpose of Aim 2 is to pilot a single-arm trial of the finalized NOURISH-ALL intervention in a sample of families of youth in the early phases of ALL treatment to assess recruitment, retention, and dose received.
Results will directly inform the design of the fully powered randomized control trial to test intervention efficacy (R01 application to be submitted in Year 4).
|
Our NOURISH-ALL intervention will build on this existing NOURISH-T family based behavioral intervention with families of cancer survivors.
The intervention, NOURISH-ALL, will adapt these family-based health promotion strategies to the early ALL treatment context.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Recruitment Rate
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0)
|
Measured by # enrolled / # eligible
|
Baseline (Week 0)
|
|
Retention Rate
Time Frame: Post-Intervention (Week 6), Follow-Up (Month 6)
|
Measured by # completed intervention / # enrolled
|
Post-Intervention (Week 6), Follow-Up (Month 6)
|
|
Intended dose received
Time Frame: Post-Intervention (Week 6), Follow-Up (Month 6)
|
Measured by # sessions attended / # sessions offered
|
Post-Intervention (Week 6), Follow-Up (Month 6)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Child Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Post-Intervention (Week 6), Follow-Up (Month 6)
|
Measured by child height and weight
|
Baseline (Week 0), Post-Intervention (Week 6), Follow-Up (Month 6)
|
|
Child Physical Activity
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Post-Intervention (Week 6), Follow-Up (Month 6)
|
Measured by Actigraph wGT3x+ activity monitor
|
Baseline (Week 0), Post-Intervention (Week 6), Follow-Up (Month 6)
|
|
Child Sleep
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Post-Intervention (Week 6), Follow-Up (Month 6)
|
Measured by Actigraph wGT3x+ activity monitor
|
Baseline (Week 0), Post-Intervention (Week 6), Follow-Up (Month 6)
|
|
Family Distress
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Post-Intervention (Week 6), Follow-Up (Month 6)
|
Measured by Distress Thermometer (DT)
|
Baseline (Week 0), Post-Intervention (Week 6), Follow-Up (Month 6)
|
|
Family Stress Measures
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Post-Intervention (Week 6), Follow-Up (Month 6)
|
Measured by Psychosocial Assessment Tool v3.0 (PAT 3.0)
|
Baseline (Week 0), Post-Intervention (Week 6), Follow-Up (Month 6)
|
|
Child Dietary Intake
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Post-Intervention (Week 6), Follow-Up (Month 6)
|
Total calories, % calories from fat, and other nutrition variables will be measured by Automated Self-Administered 24-hour Dietary Assessment Tool (ASA24)
|
Baseline (Week 0), Post-Intervention (Week 6), Follow-Up (Month 6)
|
|
Body Composition
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Post-Intervention (Week 6), Follow-Up (Month 6)
|
Measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan
|
Baseline (Week 0), Post-Intervention (Week 6), Follow-Up (Month 6)
|
|
Subcutaneous fat
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Post-Intervention (Week 6), Follow-Up (Month 6)
|
Skinfold thickness measurement
|
Baseline (Week 0), Post-Intervention (Week 6), Follow-Up (Month 6)
|
|
Body Composition - Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Post-Intervention (Week 6), Follow-Up (Month 6)
|
Measured by InBody Scale bioelectrical impedance analysis
|
Baseline (Week 0), Post-Intervention (Week 6), Follow-Up (Month 6)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Keith August, MD, Children's Mercy Kansas City
- Principal Investigator: Carolyn Bates, PhD, University of Kansas Medical Center
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY00002516
- 1K08CA279877-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.