Efficacy and Safety of Ultrapulse Carbon Dioxide Laser Treatment in Eyelid Tumors

March 5, 2024 updated by: Yingfeng Zheng, Sun Yat-sen University
This study aims to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of ultrapulse carbon dioxide (CO₂) laser excision in the treatment of eyelid tumors, including xanthelasma, pigmented nevi, keratoses, and so on.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

-Background: The assessment of the efficacy and safety of Ultrapulse CO₂ laser in treating eyelid lesions is crucial for clinical applications. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of super-pulsed CO₂ laser in treating different types of eyelid lesions, particularly marginal and large lesions, to provide comprehensive clinical guidance and decision support.

-Main Objectives: A retrospective analysis of the efficacy and safety of Ultrapulse CO₂ laser treatment for various types of eyelid lesions, including xanthelasma, pigmented nevi, keratoses, and so on.

-Study Design: This study will include 1000 patients diagnosed with eyelid lesions, including xanthelasma, pigmented nevi, keratoses, and so on. All patients undergoing Ultrapulse CO₂ laser treatment. The evaluation will focus on the efficacy and safety of Ultrapulse CO₂ laser treatment for different types of eyelid lesions.

-Study Population and Anticipated Enrollment: Patients with eyelid lesions (n=1000)

-Inclusion Criteria: Clinically diagnosed with eyelid lesions, including xanthelasma, pigmented nevi, keratoses, and so on.

No history of photosensitivity, bleeding, or coagulation disorders Willing to attend follow-up appointments as scheduled

-Exclusion Criteria: Presence of infection in the target area Allergy to lidocaine Keloid-prone or poor skin repair ability Pregnant or lactating Recent history of severe infectious diseases, active skin diseases, or major diseases affecting the cardiovascular, liver, kidney, endocrine, and hematopoietic systems History of malignant tumors or immune system disorders

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

1000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Guanzhou, China
        • Recruiting
        • Sun Yat-sen University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

A cohort of 1000 patients with eyelid tumors, including various types of tumors. Inclusive of xanthelasma, pigmented nevi, keratoses, and so on.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinically diagnosed with eyelid lesions, including xanthelasma, pigmented nevi, keratoses, and so on.
  • No history of photosensitivity, bleeding, or coagulation disorders
  • Willing to attend follow-up appointments as scheduled

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of infection in the target area
  • Allergy to lidocaine
  • Keloid-prone or poor skin repair ability
  • Pregnant or lactating
  • Recent history of severe infectious diseases, active skin diseases, or major diseases affecting the cardiovascular, liver, kidney, endocrine, and hematopoietic systems
  • History of malignant tumors or immune system disorders

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Ultrapulse Carbon Dioxide Laser
The study investigates the use of the Ultrapulse Carbon Dioxide Laser for the excision of eyelid lesions, including xanthelasma, pigmented nevi, keratoses, and so on.
Excision of eyelid lesion
Other Names:
  • CO2 Laser

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clearance rate
Time Frame: 12 months
The lesion clearance rate was classified as the proportion of the lesion cleared (<50%; 50-75%; 76-99%; or >99%).
12 months
Recurrence rate
Time Frame: 12 months
Recurrence was defined as the regrowth of a new xanthelasma lesion within the previously excised area.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative complications
Time Frame: 12 months
Lesion recurred, minor trichiasis, partial sparse to absent eyelashes, hypertrophic scar, hyperpigmentation
12 months
Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score
Time Frame: 12 months
Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score for measuring improvement in clinical outcomes: 1=worsened; 2=no change; 3=minor improvement; 4=moderate improvement; 5=marked improvement; 6=near-total improvement; and 7=total improvement.
12 months
Patient satisfaction score
Time Frame: 12 months
Patient satisfaction was evaluated subjectively by the physician on a f ve-point scale, as follows: 0=no change; 1=minor improvement; 2=moderate improvement; 3=marked improvement; 4=near-total or total improvement.
12 months
Number of treatment sessions
Time Frame: 12 months
Number of treatment sessions for complete clearance
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Xianchai Lin, PhD, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 4, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

January 16, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 7, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Keratosis

Clinical Trials on Ultra-pulsed Carbon Dioxide Laser

Subscribe