Race-Based Stress and Cognitive Training for MCI

July 21, 2025 updated by: Rachael Ellison, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science

Race Based Stress and Empowerment Focused Compensatory Cognitive Training for Mild Cognitive Impairment

This a two phase project that aims to pilot a new adaptation (Phase 1) of Motivationally Enhanced Compensatory Cognitive Training for Mild Cognitive Impairment (ME-CCT; an originally VA-based cognitive rehabilitation manualized intervention for older adults with MCI, with a focus on the impact of stress on cognitive functioning; that integrates components from the Race Based Stress and Empowerment (RBSE) group for an increased focus on race-based stress and discrimination for racial minority older adults (i.e., RBSEF-CCT-MCI). In a pilot open trial, 75-150 participants will receive group-based intervention for 8 weeks, with 8-10 participants per group.

Following the pilot study, the investigators will complete a randomized controlled trial (RCT) (Phase 2) to compare the efficacy of the RBSEF-CCT-MCI with the ME-CCT. In the RCT, 75-150 participants will be randomized into either 1) The active control group, who will complete the original, ME-CCT training program, or 2) The experimental group, who will complete the newly developed RBSE-CCT-MCI. Both research groups will complete the interventions for 8 weeks, with 8-10 participants per group.

Hypothesis: Participation in this newly developed/updated intervention (i.e., RBSEF-CCT-MCI) will result in improvements in both (a) subjective and (b) objective cognitive functioning, and (c) self-reported mental health symptoms.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

African American (AA) individuals are at higher risk for non-normative cognitive decline, particularly due to increased rates of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risk factors. These types of risk factors (e.g., hypertension, diabetes mellitus, obesity, hyperlipidemia, etc.) are independently associated with brain imaging changes, even before potential clinical manifestation of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease.

When compared to the general aging population, AA adults experience disproportionately higher rates of hypertension as well as both an earlier age of onset and higher concomitant morbidity and mortality from hypertension when compared to any other racial/ethnic group in the US. AA individuals experience greater exposure to specific chronic stressors, such as discrimination and low socioeconomic status, as well as report higher overall levels of stress compared to white individuals. However, racial disparities in hypertension rates persist even after controlling for socioeconomic status. Researchers have failed to demonstrate any risk factors that are biologically unique to AA patients. These findings have led researchers to consider other psychosocial and environmental factors that may explain the observed hypertension disparities, namely, racial discrimination and racial segregation.

AA older adults are not only at higher risk for non-normative cognitive decline due to both semi-direct (i.e., increased risk of cardiovascular/cerebrovascular risk factors, such as HTN), but other factors such as race-related stress may not only exacerbate these risk factors, but also interfere day-to-day with optimal cognitive performance due to overall increased stress and diversion of cognitive resources. Therefore, for AA older adults, there is an increased need not only for interventions that help to compensate for cognitive decline and increase daily functioning, but also an increased need for an intervention to reduce the effects of race-related stressors. The proposed Race-Based Stress and Empowerment Focused Compensatory Cognitive Training for Mild Cognitive Impairment (RBSEF-CCT-MCI) as proposed in this pilot, is one such intervention that would accomplish those aims and has the potential for a significant impact on patient care for AA older adults who could benefit from additional tools and strategies to improve cognitive functioning and increase day-to-day independent functioning.

Of note, original authors of both protocols have granted consent for modifications of their interventions, and the investigators already have a draft of the new protocol.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

9

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60064
        • Recruiting
        • Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Rachael Ellison, PhD
        • Contact:
          • Rachael Ellison, PhD
          • Phone Number: 312-940-1718

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The study will be conducted in-person, so they must be able to travel to Rosalind Franklin University.
  • The study will initially be limited to participants who self-identify as Black/African American, or who self-identify with other racial/ethnic groups in addition to self-identifying as Black/African-American; however, may be expanded to include participants that identify as Hispanic/Latine.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants are ineligible to participate in this study if they are not at least 65 years of age and are not experiencing at least mild cognitive impairment or self-reported cognitive difficulties.
  • Participants will also be excluded if they have a diagnosis of dementia (i.e., major neurocognitive disorder), intellectual disability, mild head injury (i.e., concussion) within the last six months, and/or a history of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury.
  • Diagnosis of dementia may be from self-report or other medical records, or for participants to fail screening cognitive assessments (i.e., the RBANS) that would suggest they may be at the level of dementia (i.e., major neurocognitive disorder) as ultimately determined by study PI with objective scores less then 2 standard deviations below the mean on the RBANS.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental: RBSEF-CCT-MCI
Participants will complete the newly developed RBSE-CCT-MCI training program.
RBSEF-CCT-MCI differs from ME-CCT in that this intervention integrates psychoeducation and strategies for processing and coping with race/ethnicity-related stressors, as part of the larger conversation in ME-CCT regarding stress, and how stress interferes with attention, learning, and subsequently one's subjective sense of memory.
Other: Control Group: ME-CCT
Participants will complete the original, ME-CCT training program.

ME-CCT focuses on:

  1. Cognitive training, psychotherapeutic, and lifestyle techniques.
  2. Incorporates CCT techniques designed to help patients manage problems with memory, attention, and executive functions (i.e., organization, planning, decision-making, and problem-solving).
  3. Includes mindfulness-based stress reduction practice which has been shown to improve cognitive and neuropsychiatric function in various populations.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Verbal learning and memory
Time Frame: up to eight weeks
Assessed by the California Verbal Learning Test- Second Edition (CVLT-II)
up to eight weeks
Basic auditory attention and working memory
Time Frame: up to eight weeks
Assessed by the Digit Span subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-IV)
up to eight weeks
Psychomotor processing speed
Time Frame: up to eight weeks
Assessed by the Coding and Symbol search subtests of the WAIS-IV
up to eight weeks
Psychomotor processing speed; executive functioning
Time Frame: up to eight weeks
As assessed by the Stroop Test
up to eight weeks
Self-report of prospective and retrospective memory
Time Frame: up to eight weeks
The Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ). The PRMQ developed to provide a self-report measure of prospective and retrospective memory slips in everyday life. It consists of sixteen items, eight asking about prospective memory failures, and eight concerning retrospective failures.
up to eight weeks
Self-report of cognitive concerns
Time Frame: up to eight weeks
Neuro-QOL (neuro-quality of life); applied cognition: general concerns & executive functioning (EF) subscales
up to eight weeks
The Patient Health Questionnaire-9
Time Frame: up to eight weeks
(i.e., PHQ-9; assessing self-report symptoms of depression)
up to eight weeks
Self-report symptoms of anxiety
Time Frame: up to eight weeks
As assessed by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 questionnaire (i.e., GAD-7)
up to eight weeks
Self-reported daily functioning
Time Frame: up to eight weeks
As assessed by The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (i.e., WHODAS 2.0)
up to eight weeks
The Racial Microaggressions Scale
Time Frame: up to eight weeks
Assessing the occurrence and distress elicited by racial indignities, slights, mistreatment, or offenses that people of color may face on a recurrent or consistent basis.
up to eight weeks
The Trauma Symptoms of Discrimination Scale
Time Frame: up to eight weeks
Self-report measure assessing the traumatizing impact of discrimination broadly by measuring anxiety-related symptoms of trauma due to discriminatory experiences
up to eight weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rachael L Ellison, PhD, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 15, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 15, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 9, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 24, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RBSEF-MCI-CCT

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe