- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06358144
Cannabis Edibles Packaging Imagery Experiment
The Impact of Cannabis Edibles Packaging Descriptors on Consumer Appeal, Harm Perceptions and Willingness to Try: Packaging Imagery Experiment
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
North Carolina
-
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- US resident
- Aged 18-65, inclusive
- Up to 13% of participants will be those who identify as Black/African American
- Up to 16% of participants will be those who identify as Hispanic
- Approximately 50% of participants will be past year cannabis users
- Was not a participant on the anteceding experiment, Cannabis Edibles Packaging Descriptors Experiment
Exclusion Criteria:
- Does not currently reside in the United States
- Younger than 18 or older than 65
- Does not provide information regarding history of cannabis use
- Otherwise eligible but demographic and/or user group quotas have been met
- Was a participant on the anteceding experiment, Cannabis Edibles Packaging Descriptors Experiment
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Flavor Imagery
Four edible product packages (gummies, chocolate, mints, cookies) with package imagery in a flavor theme.
|
Participants in the four intervention conditions will be shown four cannabis edibles packages that have been altered to contain one of the imagery themes.
All participants will see the same four products, and each condition will see the products with the same imagery theme.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Animal Imagery
Four edible product packages (gummies, chocolate, mints, cookies) with package imagery in an animal theme.
|
Participants in the four intervention conditions will be shown four cannabis edibles packages that have been altered to contain one of the imagery themes.
All participants will see the same four products, and each condition will see the products with the same imagery theme.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Nature Imagery
Four edible product packages (gummies, chocolate, mints, cookies) with package imagery in a nature theme.
|
Participants in the four intervention conditions will be shown four cannabis edibles packages that have been altered to contain one of the imagery themes.
All participants will see the same four products, and each condition will see the products with the same imagery theme.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Medical Imagery
Four edible product packages (gummies, chocolate, mints, cookies) with package imagery in a medical theme.
|
Participants in the four intervention conditions will be shown four cannabis edibles packages that have been altered to contain one of the imagery themes.
All participants will see the same four products, and each condition will see the products with the same imagery theme.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: No Imagery (Control)
Four edible product packages (gummies, chocolate, mints, cookies) without any added packaging imagery.
|
Participants in the control condition will see the same four product packages, but without any added imagery.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Product Appeal Scoring
Time Frame: After exposure to product packaging - up to 1 min
|
One item to assess the appeal of the product. Results will be reported as mean for all products within condition. Question: How appealing is this product to you? Response options: (0) Not at all appealing to (10) Very appealing |
After exposure to product packaging - up to 1 min
|
|
Package Appeal Scoring
Time Frame: After exposure to product packaging - up to 1 min
|
One item to assess appeal of the packaging of the product. Results will be reported as mean for all products within condition. Question: How appealing is this packaging to you? Response options: (0) Not at all appealing to (10) Very appealing |
After exposure to product packaging - up to 1 min
|
|
Product Harm Perceptions (Absolute) Scoring
Time Frame: After exposure to product packaging - up to 1 min
|
After exposure to product packaging; 1 min One item to assess participants' opinions of safety of the product. Results will be reported as the number of each type of response. Question: How safe do you think it would be to eat the edible in this package? Response options: (1) Completely unsafe, (2) Somewhat unsafe, (3) Somewhat safe, (4) Completely safe |
After exposure to product packaging - up to 1 min
|
|
Package Harm Perceptions (Absolute) Scoring
Time Frame: After exposure to product packaging - up to 1 min
|
One item to assess participants' opinions of product safety based on the packaging. Results will be reported as the number of each type of response. Question: How much does this packaging make you think this edible is safe to consume? Response options: (1) Not at all; (2) A little; (3) Somewhat; (4) A lot |
After exposure to product packaging - up to 1 min
|
|
Willingness to Try Free Sample Scoring
Time Frame: After exposure to product packaging - up to 1 min
|
One question will assess the participant's willingness to try the product shown. Results will be reported as the number of each type of response. Question: How interested would you be in a free sample of this product? Response options: (1) Not at all; (2) Slightly; (3) Somewhat; (4) Moderately; (5) Very |
After exposure to product packaging - up to 1 min
|
|
Willingness to Try Product Scoring
Time Frame: After exposure to product packaging - up to 1 min
|
One item to assess the participants' willingness to try the product based on the packaging. Results will be reported as the number of each type of response. Question: How much does seeing this packaging make you want to try this edible? Response options: (1) Not at all; (2) A little; (3) Somewhat; (4) A lot |
After exposure to product packaging - up to 1 min
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Appeal to Children Scoring
Time Frame: After exposure to product packaging - up to 1 min
|
One item to assess the participants' assessment of the product packaging's potential appeal to children. Results will be reported as mean for all products within condition. Question: How appealing do you think this packaging would be to children? Response options: (0) Not at all appealing to (10) Very appealing |
After exposure to product packaging - up to 1 min
|
|
Harm Perceptions (Relative) Scoring
Time Frame: After exposure to product packaging - up to 1 min
|
One question assessing participants' opinions of safety of the product compared to other, similar, products. Results will be reported as the number of each type of response. Question: Compared to other edible products on the market, how safe do you think the edible in this package is? Response options: (1) Much less safe; (2) Somewhat less safe; (3) As safe; (4) Somewhat safer; (5) Much safer |
After exposure to product packaging - up to 1 min
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Perception of Quality Scoring
Time Frame: After exposure to product packaging - up to 1 min
|
One item to assess the participants' perceptions of the quality of the product. Results will be reported as the number of each type of response. Question: To what extent do you agree or disagree that this looks like a good quality product? Response options: (1) Strongly disagree to (5) Strongly agree |
After exposure to product packaging - up to 1 min
|
|
Perception of Good Taste Scoring
Time Frame: After exposure to product packaging - up to 1 min
|
One item to assess the participants' perceptions of the taste of the product. Results will be reported as the number of each type of response. Question: To what extent do you agree or disagree that this edible might taste good? Response options: (1) Strongly disagree to (5) Strongly agree |
After exposure to product packaging - up to 1 min
|
|
Perception of Healthfulness of Product Scoring
Time Frame: After exposure to product packaging - up to 1 min
|
One item to asses the participants' perceptions of the healthfulness of the product based on the packaging. Results will be reported as the number of each type of response. Question: How much does this packaging make you think this edible is healthy? Response options: (1) Not at all; (2) A little; (3) Somewhat; (4) A lot |
After exposure to product packaging - up to 1 min
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Beth Reboussin, PhD, Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB00111438
- R01DA053209 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cannabis Use
-
Indiana UniversityNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)RecruitingMarijuana Abuse | Marijuana Use | Addiction | Substance Use | Cannabis Dependence | Substance Use Disorders | Cannabis Use | Substance Abuse | Addiction, Substance | Marijuana Dependence | Substance Dependence | Marijuana Smoking | Cannabis Abuse | Cannabis Use Disorder | Marijuana | Cannabis Intoxication | Substance Related... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Anders Fink-Jensen, MD, DMSciNeurobiology Research Unit, RigshospitaletRecruitingCannabis Dependence | Cannabis Abuse | Cannabis Use Disorder | Cannabis Use Disorders | Cannabis AddictionDenmark
-
Stanford UniversityNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)Not yet recruiting
-
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)Enrolling by invitation
-
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal...CompletedCannabis | Cannabis Dependence | Cannabis Use | Cannabis Smoking | Cannabis Use, UnspecifiedCanada
-
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal...Recruiting
-
Medical University of South CarolinaNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingTobacco Use Disorder | Marijuana Use | Tobacco Use Cessation | Cannabis Use | Cannabis Use DisorderUnited States
-
Boston Children's HospitalNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)RecruitingCannabis Use | Cannabis Use Disorder | Cannabis IntoxicationUnited States
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalNot yet recruitingCannabis Use Disorder
-
Medical University of South CarolinaNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); National Institutes of Health (NIH)Recruiting
Clinical Trials on Packaging imagery
-
The University of New South WalesMenicon Co., Ltd.Completed
-
University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation...NuVision Biotherapies LtdCompleted
-
Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyUnknownMalignant Ascites | Malignant Pleural Effusion,China
-
VA Eastern Colorado Health Care SystemUnited States Department of DefenseCompletedSuicide, Attempted | Medication Adherence | Accidental Overdose | Deliberate OverdoseUnited States
-
University of TorontoCompletedFood MarketingCanada
-
Stanford UniversityRobert Wood Johnson FoundationCompleted
-
Katherine SawyerCompletedSmoking, TobaccoUnited Kingdom
-
Roswell Park Cancer InstituteNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedCigarette Smoking-Related CarcinomaUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoRecruiting
-
Georgetown UniversityCompleted