Comparison of Vocal Biomarkers for Depression and Anxiety to Formal Clinical Assessments

June 13, 2024 updated by: Ellipsis Health

Prediction of a Structured Clinical Assessment by Patient Reported Outcomes and Machine Learning Algorithms: A Comparative Study

Participants will be recruited to complete self reported surveys normally used as standards of care for screening and monitoring depression and anxiety symptom severity, provide a voice sample composed of an answer to open ended questions and then be assessed by a mental health professional using structured and clinically validated assessment tools for depression and anxiety. Their voice will be analyzed by machine learning models that predict the severity of depression and anxiety symptoms. The models' performance will be compared to the clinician assessments and how that correlation compares to a similar comparison between the clinician assessments with the self reported surveys. It is hypothesized that the performance of the machine learning models in assessing the severity of depression and anxiety symptoms is no worse than the self reported surveys when both are compared to clinician assessments. It is also hypothesized that presence or absence of the diagnoses of Major Depressive Disorder and Generalized Anxiety Disorder can be predicted better than chance by the analysis of the participant's voice sample using machine learning models.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

540

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94104
        • Ellipsis Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

~540 individuals aged 18 and above, of any gender, race, culture, ethnicity, sexual orientation or educational level residing anywhere in the United States.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Native speaker or conversant in English
  • Access to smartphone or computer with microphone
  • Provision of esigned and dated informed consent form
  • Willingness to adhere to the study protocol
  • To participate in the subsequent clinical interview portion of this study in addition to the above inclusion criteria, a participant must provide an evaluable and qualified voice sample.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Speech impairments or other conditions that impact their ability to speak clearly
  • Under the influence of recreational drugs or alcohol
  • Ill or experiencing heavy allergies or temporary conditions affecting respiration, voice, or speaking.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary Outcome A
Time Frame: 4 days
Extent of categorical agreement, measured in weighted kappa, between Ellipsis Health Software as a Medical Device severity of depression and clinician's rating of severity of depression.
4 days
Primary Outcome B
Time Frame: 4 days
Extent of categorical agreement, measured in weighted kappa, between Ellipsis Health Software as a Medical Device severity of anxiety and clinician's rating of severity of anxiety.
4 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Secondary Outcome A
Time Frame: 4 days
Extent of agreement of presence, measured in the Equal Error Rate on the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve, between Ellipsis Health Software aa a Medical Device detection of Major Depressive Disorder and clinician's assessment for the diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder, as expressed as Sensitivity and Specificity.
4 days
Secondary Outcome B
Time Frame: 4 days
Extent of agreement of presence, measured in the Equal Error Rate on the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve, between Ellipsis Health Software as a Medical Device detection of Generalized Anxiety Disorder and clinician's assessment for the diagnosis of Generalized Anxiety Disorder, as expressed as Sensitivity and Specificity.
4 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 12, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 13, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression/Anxiety

3
Subscribe