- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06518200
Preventing Breast Cancer Therapy-related Cardiovascular Toxicity With a Daily-adapted Program With Mhealth Support (ATOPE-PRO)
ATOPE-PRO: Effects on the Prevention of Breast Cancer Therapy-related Cardiovascular Toxicity of a Daily-adapted and Individualized Program With Support From a Mobile Application
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
More and more women are experiencing breast cancer at younger ages, yet survival rates have become very promising. However, years after cancer treatment, related sequelae (physical, psychological, or emotional) may emerge, responsible for post-disease fatalities in many women. The occurrence of these sequelae largely depends on treatment-induced toxicity and individual health status, which is related to lifestyle habits. Among these sequelae, cancer-related cardiovascular toxicity (CTR-CVT) is noteworthy, with an incidence close to 40% in breast cancer, closely linked to treatments such as chemotherapy (especially anthracyclines), targeted therapy (trastuzumab), and radiotherapy (left side or mediastinum), causing DNA and mitochondrial damage. Traditionally defined as a reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50% in its mildest form, and a decrease in global longitudinal strain (GLS) of >15% from baseline and/or an increase in cardiac markers (cardiac troponin I or T cTnI/cTnT >99th percentile, brain natriuretic peptide BNP ≥35 pg/mL, or NT-proBNP ≥125 pg/mL) to severe (requiring inotropic support, mechanical circulatory support, or consideration for transplantation), adding the need for monitoring through various tests, not just LVEF, as it would be too late to detect it. The risk detection of TCVRC is based on medical treatments, which sometimes are insufficient since many patients theoretically considered low-risk develop TCVRC. This has led to the need to study and include other patient-related factors at the time of diagnosis, such as previous presence of cardiovascular diseases, age, lifestyle habits, and comorbidities, to be considered for overall cardiovascular and oncological prognosis and individualized surveillance of TCVRC, along with additional factors that add to the complexity of risk assessment such as cancer type, duration, and doses of oncological treatment. However, the scientific evidence supporting the inclusion of some of these parameters is of questionable quality (level C) and, moreover, they are not usually included in routine assessments, making them less applicable.
To improve the situation and achieve proper prevention of TCVRC, it is necessary to identify parameters with good sensitivity for early detection that can preferably be performed routinely by different healthcare professionals involved in the continuum of care, as well as related risk factors. With this information, the implementation of interventions that could limit treatment interruptions and improve survival after breast cancer would be facilitated. In this context, the European Society of Cardiology Guidelines highlight, in addition to the improvement of detection tools, the inclusion of new parameters, the creation of large data registries, the use of artificial intelligence, or the determination of new risk stratification algorithms, among others.
There is a lack of access to structured physical exercise programs for cancer patients, even though adaptation of exercise to their health status is crucial, as excessive doses could be harmful. Ondulatory exercise prescription may be more suitable for cancer patients, as it allows better adaptation to their health status. So far, one of the systems to achieve this has been prescription based on heart rate variability (HRV) previously used in the sports world and in some cardiovascular pathologies but promising and little studied in the cancer world. However, given the complexity of this disease, its treatments, and the impact it has on different spheres of these patients' health, the inclusion of additional markers is suggested to further optimize personalized exercise programs based on individual needs. With the support of current technologies, monitoring and control of physiological parameters are facilitated, potentially reducing the costs of in-person supervision by healthcare professionals but also the potential health risks in these patients when engaging in physical exercise.
Regarding these interventions, both physical activity and exercise have been recognized as potent multi-effect non-pharmacological therapies in the treatment of TCVRC, although to achieve optimal physiological adaptations and individualization, physical exercise programs must be correctly prescribed. In recent years, interest has shifted towards supervised high-intensity interval exercise, which has been shown to be safe, well-tolerated, effective for TCVRC treatment, and cost-effective. However, most physical exercise programs implemented are general programs with linear prescriptions and questionable adherence. To address adherence issues, physical exercise programs have been combined with behavioral change programs, showing promising short-term results but with loss in the medium/long term. In this regard, the use of technology and patient monitoring, which provide continuous feedback and have proven to be an effective and useful tool for establishing a healthy lifestyle, could offer a solution for both patients and professionals in improving adherence.
ATOPE-PRO aims to integrate into the usual care continuum of women with breast cancer a personalized and individualized mhealth model (ATOPE+ 2.0) for TCVRC prevention, which will allow us to advance towards precision clinical care, to complete its implementation and transfer of results, resulting in an improvement in quality of life, recurrence, and death, meeting the standards requested, through refining and automating the process, ensuring adherence, and offering safe and effective doses of physical exercise.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Irene Cantarero Villanueva, PhD
- Phone Number: +34 637007250
- Email: irenecantarero@ugr.es
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Isabel Blancas López-Barajas, PhD
- Phone Number: +34 958257235
- Email: iblancas@ugr.es
Study Locations
-
-
-
Granada, Spain, 18016
- University of Granada
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Recently diagnosed with stage I-III breast cancer
- Treatments predisposing to cardiotoxicity (anthracyclines, targeted therapies, radiotherapy)
- Signed informed consent form
- Medical authorisation to participate
- Smartphone user level
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient underwent previous cancer treatments.
- Patients were previously diagnosed with cancer
- Pregnant patients. Patients performing other type of therapeutic exercise at diagnosis time with an intake >or = to 150 moderate-intensity or 75 min of vigorous-intensity a day
- Therapeutic exercise practice not recommended because psychiatric or cognitive disorders or cute or chronic condition that prevents exercise (advanced lung disease, oxygen requirement, stenosis >70%, metastasis etc.).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention Group
Health recommendations (educational videos) + Individualised exercise intervention
|
Individualised recommendations for physical activity and exercise, lifestyle, stress management and symptom management with solid scientific evidence established by health organisations and scientific reference committeess through the ATOPE-PRO mobile application based on patients reported status.
Follow-up of an individualised exercise program adjusted by daily monitoring of the level of physical, physiological and psychological condition.
|
|
Other: Control Group
Health recommendations (educational videos)
|
Recommendations for physical activity and exercise, lifestyle, stress management and symptom management with solid scientific evidence established by health organisations and scientific reference committeess through the ATOPE-PRO mobile application.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiotoxicity
Time Frame: At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
Echocardiography: left ventricular ejection fraction expressed as percentage.
|
At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
|
Systolic function
Time Frame: At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
Echocardiography: Strain longitudinal global expressed as percentage.
|
At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of cardiovascular events
Time Frame: At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
Clinical records registration expressed as number (N) of cardiovascular events.
|
At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
|
Comorbidities
Time Frame: At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
Any chronic pathological condition different from the oncologic one will be registed by a clinical interview, an expressed in results as number (N) and type.
|
At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
|
Heart rate variability
Time Frame: At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
Assessment of cardiac autonomic system balance by a Holter registration, registering the log-transformed root mean square of successive R-R intervals (lnRMSSD) and expressed as milliseconds (ms).
|
At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
|
Heart rate
Time Frame: At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
Resting heart rate registration by a Holter, expressed as beats per minute (bpm).
|
At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
|
Blood pressure
Time Frame: At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure levels registration after evaluation by a digital sphygmomanometer, expressed as mmHg (mercury millimetres).
|
At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
|
Cardiac damage
Time Frame: At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
Collection of capillary samples for Cardiac troponin T measurement, with results expressed as ng/L, indicating higher values thatn 40ng/L cardiotoxicity or other cardiac injuries.
|
At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
|
Cardiac Damage
Time Frame: At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
Blood test for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I evaluation, considering normal values below 14ng/L.
|
At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
|
Endothelial status
Time Frame: At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
By registering ascorbic acid levels provided by blood test, being the reference range of 0.6-2 mg/dL
|
At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
|
Cardiorespiratory Fitness
Time Frame: At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
A Treadmill Ergometric Test will be performed in order to evaluate VO2 peak values, calcultated as the highest VO2 value in liters per minute during the test.
Cut-off points will be set at low(<13 mL·kg-1·min-1), moderate (13.916.9 mL·kg-1·min-1), and high (≥17 mL·kg-1·min-1), considering a minimal clinically important difference a 6% of Vo2 peak change.
|
At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
|
Quadriceps muscle thickness
Time Frame: At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
Quadriceps muscular ecography will be used, expressing results as centimeters (cm).
|
At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
|
Body Fat Mass
Time Frame: At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) will be perfomerd by using an Inbody 720 for measuring body fat mass, expressed in kilograms (kg).
|
At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
|
Height
Time Frame: At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) will be perfomerd by using an Inbody 720 for measuring body fat mass, expressed in kilograms (kg). A tallimeter will be used to register height, expressed in meters (m). |
At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
|
Weight
Time Frame: At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) will be perfomerd by using an Inbody 720 for measuring body weight, expressed in kilograms (kg).
|
At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
|
Body Mass Index
Time Frame: At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
By registering height and weight, Body mass index (BMI) will be calculated as weight (kg)/ height (m^2), expressed as kg/m^2.
|
At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
|
Body Fat Percentage
Time Frame: At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) will be perfomerd by using an Inbody 720 for measuring body fat percentage, expressed as a percentage (%).
|
At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
|
Physical Activity level
Time Frame: At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
International physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ) will be used to report physical activity levels of participants, expressed as Metabolic Equivalent of Task per week (METs/week).
|
At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
|
Sleep duration
Time Frame: At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
Sleep duration time, expressed as hours (h), will be recorded by activity bracelets.
|
At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
|
Fatigue
Time Frame: At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
A Likert 0-10 scale will be applied, indicating 0 the absence of the symptom, and a 10 'the most' of the symptom.
|
At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
|
Total Cholesterol
Time Frame: At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
Total cholesterol (TC) will be obtained through blood test and expressed as mg/dl.
|
At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
|
Triglycerides level
Time Frame: At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
Obtained through blood test and expressed as mmol/L.
|
At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
|
LDL-C level
Time Frame: At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol will be obtained through blood test and expressed as mg/dl.
|
At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
|
HDL-C level
Time Frame: At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
High-density lipoprotein cholesterol will be obtained through blood test and expressed as mg/dl.
|
At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
|
Total antioxidant capacity
Time Frame: At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
Oxidative Stress TAC biomarker will be assessed by blood test, expressing its results as mM-TE units.
|
At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
|
Oxidative status
Time Frame: At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
Thiobarbituric Acid Reactive Substances concentration Oxidative Stress TBARS biomarker will be assessed by blood test, being results expressed as the number of milligrammes of malonaldehyde per kilogramme of sample
|
At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
|
Epigenetic profile
Time Frame: At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
miRNA expression profile quantification: analysis of miRNA expression profile by massive sequencing with specific equipment, reporting changes in expression pre and post intervention as Log2 fold change (Log2FC).
|
At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
|
Inflammatory status
Time Frame: At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
C-reactive protein levels obtained by blood samples, expressed as mg/dl.
|
At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
|
Immune status
Time Frame: At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
Interleuquin-6 (IL-6) levels obtained by blood samples, expressed as pg/ml.
|
At diagnosis before treatments, after 6 months, and one year after diagnosis.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Irene Cantarero Villanueva, PhD, Universidad de Granada
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Postigo-Martin P, Penafiel-Burkhardt R, Gallart-Aragon T, Alcaide-Lucena M, Artacho-Cordon F, Galiano-Castillo N, Fernandez-Lao C, Martin-Martin L, Lozano-Lozano M, Ruiz-Vozmediano J, Moreno-Gutierrez S, Illescas-Montes R, Arroyo-Morales M, Cantarero-Villanueva I. Attenuating Treatment-Related Cardiotoxicity in Women Recently Diagnosed With Breast Cancer via a Tailored Therapeutic Exercise Program: Protocol of the ATOPE Trial. Phys Ther. 2021 Mar 3;101(3):pzab014. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab014.
- Gonzalez-Santos A, Postigo-Martin P, Gallart-Aragon T, Esteban-Cornejo I, Lopez-Garzon M, Galiano-Castillo N, Arroyo-Morales M, Illescas-Montes R, Artacho-Cordon F, Martin-Martin L, Forneiro-Perez R, Lozano-Lozano M, Fernandez-Lao C, Ruiz-Vozmediano J, Sanchez-Salgado C, Cantarero-Villanueva I. Neurotoxicity prevention with a multimodal program (ATENTO) prior to cancer treatment versus throughout cancer treatment in women newly diagnosed for breast cancer: Protocol for a randomized clinical trial. Res Nurs Health. 2021 Aug;44(4):598-607. doi: 10.1002/nur.22136. Epub 2021 May 7.
- Postigo-Martin P, Gil-Gutierrez R, Moreno-Gutierrez S, Lopez-Garzon M, Gonzalez-Santos A, Arroyo-Morales M, Cantarero-Villanueva I. mHealth system (ATOPE+) to support exercise prescription in breast cancer survivors: a reliability and validity, cross-sectional observational study (ATOPE study). Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 8;12(1):15217. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18706-7.
- Gonzalez-Santos A, Lopez-Garzon M, Gil-Gutierrez R, Salinas-Asensio MDM, Postigo-Martin P, Cantarero-Villanueva I. Nonlinear, Multicomponent Physical Exercise With Heart Rate Variability-Guided Prescription in Women With Breast Cancer During Treatment: Feasibility and Preliminary Results (ATOPE Study). Phys Ther. 2023 Sep 1;103(9):pzad070. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzad070.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- PI23/01646
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.