- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06531551
The Effect of Acupressure on Patients Receiving Brachytherapy
July 29, 2024 updated by: Ülkü Saygılı, Selcuk University
"The Effect of Acupressure on Anxiety, Pain and Vital Signs in Gynecological Cancer Patients Receiving Brachytherapy: A Randomized Controlled Study"
This study aimed to use acupressure to reduce anxiety in gynecologic cancer patients receiving brachytherapy.
It was also aimed to investigate the effects of acupressure on anxiety, pain, and vital signs.
Study Overview
Status
Enrolling by invitation
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Brachytherapy is a type of radiotherapy used in cancer treatment.
In this method, the radiation source is placed directly on the tumor or the area to be treated.
In this way, high doses of radiation are applied only to the target area, while surrounding healthy tissues are less damaged.
Brachytherapy is usually used in the treatment of certain types of cancer, such as prostate, cervix, breast, and skin cancer.
Gynecological brachytherapy is the application of brachytherapy in the treatment of gynecological cancers.
It can be used especially in cancers of the uterus, cervix, vagina, and vulva.
This treatment method is performed by placing the radiation source in the area where the tumor is located.
Brachytherapy can be used in combination with surgery, chemotherapy, or other types of radiotherapy in the treatment of these types of cancers.
Factors such as cancer burden, the problem of achieving remission, and the need for patients to remain immobile during the procedure, which is performed in a room that needs to be isolated due to radiation, contribute to symptoms such as pain and anxiety before and during treatment.
These symptoms can sometimes affect vital signs.
The need for patients to remain immobile during brachytherapy, the need to be isolated in a room due to radiation, and the discomfort caused by the applicators also increase anxiety in women.
Patients often experience fear and anxiety because there is insufficient information about brachytherapy that could help relieve their pain and anxiety.
Despite the complexity of such a procedure and the significant patient population, there are few studies on women's experiences with brachytherapy.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
50
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Konya
-
Selçuklu, Konya, Turkey
- ülkü Saygili Düzova
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Being registered in Selçuk University Faculty of Medicine Hospital Radiation Oncology Polyclinic
- Brachytherapy (intracavital brachytherapy) treatment protocol will be applied due to gynecological cancer.
to be
- Karnofsky Performance Scale being 80 and above (Performance scale for cancer patients)
- Being between the ages of 18 and 65
- Being conscious and cooperative
- Verbal and written approval to participate in the study after an explanation about the study is made.
Exclusion Criteria:
Impaired skin integrity in the acupressure application area
- Refuses to participate in the study after making a statement about the study.
- Bone or spine metastasis
- Amputation of the extremities to be applied
- Not having any mental illness
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Study
Acupressure
|
Acupressure application protocol will be started after patient information.
This process is planned to take 30 minutes.Before the application, approximately 20 seconds of warming and rubbing without direct pressure on the acupressure points will be performed to reduce tissue sensitivity and prepare the points for acupressure.
Subsequently, the researcher will apply pressure with the thumb on the predetermined acupressure points, considering the individual's pain threshold, with 10 seconds of pressure followed by two seconds of relaxation without lifting the finger, in consecutive presses following the rhythm of breathing.
A digital clock (belonging to the researcher) will be used to determine the duration of the acupressure application.
|
|
No Intervention: Control
Only routine practices of the clinic will be carried out
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory
Time Frame: day 1
|
The Turkish validity and reliability of the State Anxiety Scale developed by Spielberger and his team in 1970 were conducted by Öner and Le Compte (1983).
This scale is used to evaluate the emotional state that an individual feels at a specific moment and under specific conditions.
The scale consists of 20 items and is evaluated on a four-point Likert scale (1-not at all, 2-somewhat, 3-very much, 4-completely).
The scale includes both direct statements (3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18) and reversed statements (1, 2, 5, 8, 10, 11, 15, 16, 19, 20).In direct statements, a value of 4 indicates high anxiety, while in reverse statements, a value of 1 signifies high anxiety.
The total score range is 20-80, and this scoring is interpreted as follows: "no anxiety" between 0-19, "mild anxiety" between 20-39, "moderate anxiety" between 40-59, "severe anxiety" between 60-79, and a score of 80 is considered a "panic value.
|
day 1
|
|
Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: day 1
|
On a 10 cm ruler with "no pain" marked at one end and "worst pain imaginable" at the other, the patient indicates their perceived level of pain.
The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is reported to be more sensitive and reliable in assessing pain intensity compared to other single-dimensional scales in the measurement of pain severity according to the Numeric Rating Scale.
|
day 1
|
|
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Time Frame: day 1
|
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale was developed by Zigmond and Snaith in 1983 (Zigmond AS & Snaith RP, 1983).
It is stated that the scale is a reliable tool for detecting depression and anxiety in outpatient settings and provides valid measurements of the severity of emotional disorders through depression and anxiety subscales.
In the scale consisting of 14 items, odd-numbered items investigate the anxiety sub-dimension, even-numbered items investigate the depression sub-dimension.
It has a four-point Liket type feature between 0 and 3 points.
Scoring for odd-numbered items 1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11 and 13 is 3, 2, 1, 0. Even items 2, 4, 7, 9, 12 and 14 are scored as 0,1,2,3.
The scale score range is between 0-42.
The cut-off score for the anxiety subscale was reported as 10, and the cut-off score for the depression subscale was reported as 7. Individuals who score above these scores constitute the risk group.
|
day 1
|
|
Vital signs
Time Frame: day 1
|
Body temperature, Blood pressure, Pulse, Respiration; will be manually assessed by the researcher for 1 minute.
Record will be made on the Personal Information Form.
|
day 1
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: ülkü Saygili Düzova, Selçuk Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
August 28, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 15, 2024
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 10, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 18, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 29, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
August 1, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 1, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 29, 2024
Last Verified
July 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 18.04.24
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.