- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06541873
Gait Patterns in Dual-task Conditions in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
August 2, 2024 updated by: Prof. Massimo Filippi, IRCCS San Raffaele
DuALS - A Cross-sectional Observational Study of Gait Patterns in Dual-task Conditions in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
The investigators hypothesize a relevant impact of cognitive status over gait performance in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), contributing to poor mobility and representing a relevant risk for falls.
The present observational, cross-sectional study on ambulatory patients with ALS will evaluate gait performance using different sets of dual-task conditions to demonstrate the importance of cognitive aspects in rehabilitation programs for these patients.
The dual-task conditions to be assessed during gait performance will include: counting backwards by 3 (executive simple task); counting backwards by 7 (executive complex task); mnemonic recall of the Rey's Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT).
Patients' performance will be compared with a group of healthy controls with similar age and sex distribution in order to highlight the specific effects of the disease.
Study Overview
Status
Not yet recruiting
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Estimated)
60
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Edoardo Gioele Spinelli, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: +39 (0)2 2643 3033
- Email: spinelli.edoardogioele@hsr.it
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Elisabetta Sarasso, MSc, PT
- Phone Number: +39 (0)2 2643 3051
- Email: sarasso.elisabetta@hsr.it
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Sampling Method
Probability Sample
Study Population
Based on previous experience and referral rates to the San Raffaele ALS Center (directed by the PI, including the Neurology and Neurorehabilitation wards and outpatient ALS clinic counting 50 new patients/year, 80 second opinion/year; 120 patients in care), the investigators plan to enroll at least 30 patients with ALS or any other MND phenotype, as well as 30 healthy controls with similar age and sex distribution, in line with sample size of previous studies ranging from 11 (Hausdorff et al., 2000) to 42 (Dubbioso et al., 2023).
Healthy controls will be recruited by word of mouth, via consenting friends and non-consanguineous relatives who will be accompanying patients for study visits.
Subjects will be assessed for suitability from their clinical notes or via a telephone screen.
Given the cross-sectional, single-visit design of the present study, the investigators expect all patients to complete the study.
Description
Patient inclusion criteria:
- Age ≥ 18 years;
- Clinical diagnosis of ALS or other MND phenotype;
- Able to walk unassisted for at least 1 minute consecutively;
- Oral and written informed consent to study participation.
Healthy control inclusion criteria:
- Age ≥ 18 years;
- Age and sex distribution similar to patients (age range: mean age of patients years ± 15 years);
- Able to walk unassisted for at least 1 minute consecutively;
- Oral and written informed consent to study participation.
Exclusion Criteria
An individual (either patient or healthy control) who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:
- Diagnosis of dementia;
- Medical conditions or substance abuse that could interfere with cognition;
- Any (other) major systemic, psychiatric, neurological, visual, and musculoskeletal disturbances or other causes of walking inability.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Patients with ALS or other motor neuron disease phenotype
Patients with ALS and other MND phenotypes will undergo gait evaluation using wearable sensors in different conditions (single-task vs dual-task conditions).
|
The dual-task conditions to be assessed during gait performance will include: counting backwards by 3 (executive simple task); counting backwards by 7 (executive complex task); mnemonic recall of the Rey's Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT).
Performance scores will be correlated with cognitive status and clinical features.
Data will be collected at the baseline (i.e., only) visit within the enrollment timeframe of 3 years from study initiation.
|
|
Healthy controls
30 healthy controls with similar age and sex distribution will undergo the same evaluations as patients
|
The dual-task conditions to be assessed during gait performance will include: counting backwards by 3 (executive simple task); counting backwards by 7 (executive complex task); mnemonic recall of the Rey's Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT).
Performance scores will be correlated with cognitive status and clinical features.
Data will be collected at the baseline (i.e., only) visit within the enrollment timeframe of 3 years from study initiation.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Dual-task cost at 1-Minute Walking Test performance
Time Frame: Cross-sectional (baseline) evaluation
|
Percentage of variability of gait scores obtained at the 1-Minute Walking Test (1minWT) (i.e., meters walked in one minute) in dual-task vs. single-task conditions in ALS patients compared with healthy controls
|
Cross-sectional (baseline) evaluation
|
|
Dual-task cost at Timed Up and Go performance
Time Frame: Cross-sectional (baseline) evaluation
|
Percentage of variability of gait scores obtained at the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test (i.e., time in seconds) in dual-task vs. single-task conditions in ALS patients compared with healthy controls
|
Cross-sectional (baseline) evaluation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Walking velocity
Time Frame: Cross-sectional (baseline) evaluation
|
Performance at 10 Meters Walking Test (10MWT) in terms of time (seconds)
|
Cross-sectional (baseline) evaluation
|
|
Executive simple task
Time Frame: Cross-sectional (baseline) evaluation
|
Ability to count backwards by 3 (number of correct subtractions in one minute)
|
Cross-sectional (baseline) evaluation
|
|
Executive complex task
Time Frame: Cross-sectional (baseline) evaluation
|
Ability to count backwards by 7 (number of correct subtractions in one minute)
|
Cross-sectional (baseline) evaluation
|
|
Mnemonic ability
Time Frame: Cross-sectional (baseline) evaluation
|
Performance at Rey's Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) (number of correct immediate recalls of 15 items presented verbally).
|
Cross-sectional (baseline) evaluation
|
|
Functional disability
Time Frame: Cross-sectional (baseline) evaluation
|
ALS Functional Rating Scale scores [ALSFRS-r] ranging from 0 (worst functional status) to 48 (best functional status), as available from clinical charts
|
Cross-sectional (baseline) evaluation
|
|
Muscle strength
Time Frame: Cross-sectional (baseline) evaluation
|
Medical Research Council [MRC] muscle testing in each tested muscle district ranging from 0 (worst performance) to 5 (best performance), as available from clinical charts
|
Cross-sectional (baseline) evaluation
|
|
Cognitive impairment
Time Frame: Cross-sectional (baseline) evaluation
|
Edinburgh Cognitive Assessment Scale [ECAS] performance ranging from 0 (worst performance) to 136 (best performance), as available from clinical charts
|
Cross-sectional (baseline) evaluation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
September 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 31, 2027
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 8, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 2, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
August 7, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 7, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 2, 2024
Last Verified
August 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- DuALS
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.