Effect of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Phrenic Nerve Regeneration Post Cardiac Surgeries

September 29, 2024 updated by: Hala Atef Abd El Fatah, Cairo University
This study will be conducted to investigate the effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on phrenic regeneration post cardiac surgery

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Phrenic nerve injury post cardiac surgery is a serious problem closely related to frequent respiratory complications. It has been associated with diaphragm dysfunction, pneumonia and difficulty weaning from mechanical ventilation in critical ill patients.

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is commonly used in physical therapy to increase muscle strength and promote muscle hypertrophy.

There is increased flow of patients after heart surgery in kasr Aini hospital who suffers from respiratory complication due to phrenic nerve injury so the hospitalization period of them increased which make economic burden in health insurance services with decreased level of quality of life that is the most concern as to improve patient status and relief this burden. So this study aims to decrease respiratory complication and improve phrenic nerve regeneration by using neuromuscular electrical stimulation as a safe, noninvasive , inexpensive and virtually risk free method.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Hala Atef Abdel Fattah

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients post cardiac surgery (coronary artery bypass graft, valve repair or replacement ).
  • Patients referred by physician.
  • Medically stable patients.
  • Both genders
  • Ages from 25 to 45
  • BMI 25-29.9 kg/m2
  • Able to understand the requirements of the study.
  • Conscious patient and respond to verbal commands.

Exclusion Criteria:

Participants will be excluded if they meet one of the following criteria:

  • Patients with rib fracture.
  • Patients developing lung cancer.
  • Patients have dementia.
  • Patients on mechanical ventilator after 24 hours
  • Metabolically unstable chronic illness

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Transcutaneous electrical diaphragmatic stimulation intervention and traditional physiotherapy group
This group will receive transcutaneous electrical diaphragmatic stimulation intervention and traditional physiotherapy three times per week for 4 weeks
It will be applied on diaphragm, 30 min per session ,3 days/week for 4 weeks at a stimulation frequency of 30 Hz, pulse width of 400 μs, the intensity was gradually increased until visible muscle contraction was observed.
The participants will receive traditional physiotherapy ( postural drainage, percussion , diaphragmatic breathing, phase 1 cardiac Rehabilitation and balance training ) three times per week for 4 weeks
Active Comparator: Traditional physiotherapy group
This group will receive traditional physiotherapy only, three times per week for 4 weeks
The participants will receive traditional physiotherapy ( postural drainage, percussion , diaphragmatic breathing, phase 1 cardiac Rehabilitation and balance training ) three times per week for 4 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Phrenic nerve conduction study: motor latency
Time Frame: 4 weeks

Nihon Kohden Neuropak M1 MEB-9200 EMG machine, made in Japan will be used to measure phrenic nerve conduction study.

Motor latency is the impulse traveled from the stimulation site to the recording site is called latency and it is measured in milliseconds (ms). its normal value: (5.74ms -7.10 ms).

4 weeks
Phrenic nerve conduction study: Amplitude
Time Frame: 4 weeks

Nihon Kohden Neuropak M1 MEB-9200 EMG machine, made in Japan will be used to measure phrenic nerve conduction study.

Amplitude represents the maximal action potential depolarization and voltage gradient for all depolarized fibers of the phrenic nerve. it is measured in microvolt or millivolt (mv). its normal value: (0.47 mv-0.83 mv).

4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Hala R. Mahmoud, professor, Cairo University
  • Study Chair: Nagwa M. Badr, professor, Cairo University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

October 4, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 15, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 29, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 29, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 1, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 29, 2024

Last Verified

September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • P.T.REC/012/005299

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe