Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the AccuraSee™ IOPCL for Secondary Implantation in the Capsular Bag to Improve Near and/or Intermediate Vision Following Previous Cataract Surgery

October 1, 2024 updated by: OnPoint Vision Inc

Early Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the AccuraSee™ IOPCL for Secondary Implantation in the Capsular Bag to Improve Near and/or Intermediate Vision Following Previous Cataract Surgery

This is a study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the AccuraSee™ intraocular pseudophakic capsular lens (IOPCL) to improve near and/or intermediate vision following previous cataract surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The objective of this study is to provide preliminary evidence of the safety and efficacy of the AccuraSee intraocular pseudophakic capsular lens (IOPCL) in qualified subjects previously implanted with an Alcon monofocal intraocular lens model SN60WF, SA60WF, or SA60AT, Johnson and Johnson model ZCB00, or Zeiss model CT LUCIA 602 who desire near vision of 20/32 or better via a myopic shift in the eye to be treated.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

All ocular eligibility criteria refer to the study (non-dominant) eye only unless otherwise noted.

  1. Subjects aged 22 years and older.
  2. Subjects who have had cataract surgery with an Alcon monofocal intraocular lens model SN60WF, SA60WF, or SA60AT (with a lens power from 10.0D to 30.0D), or Johnson and Johnson monofocal lens model ZCB00 (with a lens power from 10.0D to 26.0D), or Zeiss monofocal lens model CT LUCIA 602 (with a lens power from 10.0D to 19.0D) clearly evidenced by photographic documentation with one of the following: patient medical record, clinic chart with labeling attached, surgical record with labeling attached, or patient identification card with make, model, power and serial number.
  3. Subjects who have had cataract surgery at least 6 months from the planned date of IOPCL surgery.
  4. Subjects who require a reading add of +1.50 to +2.50 to achieve an BCNVA of 20/32 or better.
  5. Subjects with uncorrected near visual acuity (UCNVA) 20/50 or worse.
  6. Subjects with best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) 20/25 or better in both eyes.
  7. Subjects with uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA) 20/25 or better in fellow eye.
  8. Subjects with best corrected near visual acuity (BCNVA) 20/32 or better.
  9. Subjects with a manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) in the study eye between +0.25D and +1.50D.
  10. Subjects with <1D of refractive cylinder determined by keratometry readings.
  11. Subjects with a minimum endothelial cell count of 1800 cells/mm2.
  12. Subjects with a tear break up time (TBUT) ≥ 7 seconds.
  13. Subjects with a documented monovision tolerance, or who have successfully completed a 1-week contact lens trial prior to implantation with the IOPCL.
  14. For subjects who are contact lens wearers, discontinuation of lens usage prior to the preoperative visit (at least 2 weeks for subjects using soft contact lenses and at least 3 weeks for hard or rigid gas permeable (RGP) lenses) except as required to test monovision acceptance.
  15. For subjects who are contact lens wearers, two central keratometry readings with regular mires and two manifest refractions taken at least one week apart (keratometry values must not differ by more than ±0.50D in either principal meridian in the eye to be treated).
  16. Subjects able to comprehend and sign a statement of informed consent.
  17. Subjects willing and able to complete all required postoperative visits.
  18. Subjects willing to abstain from pursuing any other refractive surgery for the duration of the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects who have had cataract surgery with other than a monofocal posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL).
  2. Subjects who have had previous laser refractive surgery.
  3. Subjects who have had cataract surgery with an Alcon monofocal intraocular lens model SN60WF, SA60WF, or SA60AT (with a lens power below 10.0D or greater than 30.0D), or Johnson and Johnson monofocal intraocular lens model ZCB00 (with a lens power below 10.0D or greater than 26.0D) or Zeiss monofocal lens model CT LUCIA 602 (with a lens power below 10.0D or greater than 19.0D).
  4. Subjects who were treated with a PCIOL in a manner that is not consistent with the labeling, contraindications, or indications for use statement.
  5. Subjects whose continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis is less than 4.5 mm or more than 6.0 mm in size at the time of the preoperative visit.
  6. Subjects who have had a Nd:YAG capsulotomy less than 1 month prior to the planned date of the IOPCL surgery.
  7. Subjects with a mesopic non-dilated pupil of greater than 5.5mm.
  8. Subjects with a mesopic dilated pupil of less than 7.0 mm.
  9. Subjects who have 1D or more of refractive cylinder determined by keratometry readings.
  10. Subjects who had cataract surgery less than 6 months from the planned date of the IOPCL surgery.
  11. Subjects whose PCIOL is substantially decentered (> 1.0 mm).
  12. Subjects with anterior capsule fibrosis and phimosis that, in the opinion of the investigator, may confound the outcome or increase the risk to the subject (e.g., excessive capsule contraction potentially obstructing the visual axis or causing late secondary complications to the PCIOL such as pseudophacodenesis and IOL tilt, decentration, or dislocation due to zonular laxity, weakness or dehiscence).
  13. Subjects with capsular instability.
  14. Subjects with an anterior capsular defect.
  15. Subjects with posterior capsular defect < 0.5 mm from the edge of the existing IOL (caused by Nd:YAG capsulotomy).
  16. Subjects with a tear or rent in the anterior or posterior capsule.
  17. Subjects with any corneal pathology that is either progressive or sufficient to reduce BCDVA to 20/25 or worse.
  18. Subjects with any corneal abnormality, other than regular corneal astigmatism, that prevents accurate assessment of fluorescein tear break up time or, in the opinion of the investigator, would confound the outcome(s) of the study.
  19. Subjects with active moderate to severe meibomian gland dysfunction.
  20. Subjects with clinically severe corneal dystrophy (e.g., epithelial, stromal, or endothelial dystrophy).
  21. Subjects with diagnosed degenerative visual disorders (e.g., macular degeneration or other retinal disorders) that would reduce BCDVA to 20/25 or worse.
  22. Subjects with recurrent severe anterior or posterior segment inflammation of unknown etiology.
  23. Subjects with microphthalmos.
  24. Subjects with previous retinal detachment.
  25. Subjects with diabetic retinopathy.
  26. Subjects with iris neovascularization.
  27. Subjects with a history of steroid-responsive rise in intraocular pressure (IOP), uncontrolled glaucoma or preoperative IOP >21 mmHg.
  28. Subjects with amblyopia in either eye.
  29. Subjects who have current or historical significant binocular muscle imbalances or intermittent tropias and/or fail the cover test.
  30. Subjects who fail to demonstrate normal perception at near (33 cm) on the Worth 4 Dot Binocular Test for binocular function (using best corrected visual acuity).
  31. Subjects who fail to demonstrate at least gross stereopsis (i.e., pinching fly's wings in front of test booklet) with best corrected visual acuity on the Titmus Stereo Test (at near).
  32. Subjects with a fundus not visible.
  33. Subjects with aniridia.
  34. Subjects with optic nerve atrophy.
  35. Subjects with damaged or incomplete zonules.
  36. Subjects with inadequate anterior leaflet coverage of the PCIOL (defined as less than 0.5 mm of anterior leaflet of capsule above where the haptics will reside).
  37. Subjects with damage to the PCIOL.
  38. Subjects with a known history of pseudoexfoliation, or pseudoexfoliation diagnosed at the preoperative visit or prior to IOPCL implantation.
  39. Subjects with acute, chronic or uncontrolled systemic or ocular disease that in the opinion of the investigator would increase the operative risk or confound the outcome(s) of the study.
  40. Subjects taking medications that, in the opinion of the investigator, may confound the outcome or increase the risk to the subject (tamsulosin hydrochloride (Flomax)) or taking other medications with similar side effects (floppy iris syndrome).
  41. Subjects participating in any other ophthalmic drug or device trial during the time of this investigation.
  42. Subjects who are pregnant or nursing women; or women of child bearing age not using medically acceptable contraceptives.
  43. Subjects with certain occupational and environmental visual demands (i.e. piloting an airplane, working on and operating dangerous machinery) in the opinion of the investigator would increase the post-operative risk.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: AccuraSee™ intraocular pseudophakic capsular lens (IOPCL)
Intraocular pseudophakic capsular lens (IOPCL)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement in uncorrected near visual acuity (UCNVA) at 40 cm/16 inches
Time Frame: 12 months
Improvement in uncorrected near visual acuity (UCNVA) (at 40 cm/16 inches) at 12 months postoperatively. At least 75% of treated eyes should achieve an uncorrected near visual acuity (UCNVA) of 20/32 or better.
12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement in uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UCIVA) (at 66 cm/26 inches)
Time Frame: 12 months
Improvement in uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UCIVA) at 66 cm/26 inches at 12 months postoperatively. At least 75% of treated eyes should achieve a UCIVA of 20/40 or better.
12 months
Preservation of best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA)
Time Frame: 12 Months
Proportion of eyes (< 5%) that lose two or more lines of best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) (≥ 10 letters on the Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] chart).
12 Months
Successful delivery of the intraocular pseudophakic capsular lens (IOPCL)
Time Frame: Postoperatively from 7-14 days visit through 12 months visit
Successful delivery of the intraocular pseudophakic capsular lens (IOPCL) (defined as no capsular tear, no visible damage to either the posterior chamber intraocular lens [PCIOL] or the IOPCL, and adequate leaflet coverage of all IOPCL haptic tabs [≥ 0.5 mm of anterior leaflet of capsule above where the haptics reside]).
Postoperatively from 7-14 days visit through 12 months visit
PCIOL Long-term adherence and positional stability (tilt)
Time Frame: Postoperatively from 30-60 days visit through 12 months visit
Minimal tilt of the posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL) confirmed via Anterion® AS-OCT (defined as ≤ 10 degrees between the postoperative tilt of the PCIOL and the pre-operative tilt of the PCIOL).
Postoperatively from 30-60 days visit through 12 months visit
Intraocular Pseudophakic Capsular Lens (IOPCL) Long-term adherence and positional stability (tilt)
Time Frame: Postoperatively from 30-60 days visit through 12 months visit
Minimal tilt of the intraocular pseudophakic capsular lens (IOPCL) (using the posterior chamber intraocular lens [PCIOL] as a reference point) confirmed via Anterion® AS-OCT (defined as ≤ 10 degrees between the post-operative tilt of the PCIOL and the postoperative tilt of the IOPCL).
Postoperatively from 30-60 days visit through 12 months visit
PCIOL/IOPCL Complex Long-term adherence and positional stability (decentration)
Time Frame: Postoperatively starting at 7-14 days through 12 months
Decentration of the posterior chamber intraocular lens/intraocular pseudophakic capsular lens (PCIOL/IOPCL complex) (defined as uniform exposed area of the PCIOL outside of the IOPCL at the vertical and horizontal meridians between ≥ 0.5 mm and ≤ 1.0 mm.
Postoperatively starting at 7-14 days through 12 months
Intraoperative and postoperative adverse events
Time Frame: Intraoperative and Postoperative through 12 months
Characterization and incidence of cumulative and persistent intraoperative and post-operative adverse events.
Intraoperative and Postoperative through 12 months
Secondary Surgical Interventions (SSIs)
Time Frame: Postoperative through 12 months
Incidence of secondary surgical interventions (SSIs) (e.g., removal of interlenticular opacity, repositioning of intraocular pseudophakic capsular lens [IOPCL], explant of IOPCL, repositioning of posterior chamber intraocular lens [PCIOL]) (excluding neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet [Nd:YAG] treatments for posterior capsule opacification (PCO).
Postoperative through 12 months
Endothelial Cell Counts
Time Frame: Postoperatively beginning with 120-180 days through 12 months

Endothelial Cell Counts (mean loss, minimum, maximum, and quartiles of endothelial cell density [ECD] loss)

  • Percent of eyes that lose 20% or more ECD
  • Percent of eyes that lose 25% or more ECD
  • Percent of eyes that lose 30% or more ECD
Postoperatively beginning with 120-180 days through 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 23, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 1, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 3, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 3, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 1, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CIIPCL-022R

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe