- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06626789
Brain Signal Training to Enhance Affect Down-regulation (BrainSTEADy)
A Multi-center, Patient-blinded and Investigator-blinded, Randomized, Parallel-group, Superiority Study to Compare the Efficacy of Four Sessions of Amygdala fMRI-BOLD Neurofeedback With Yoked Sham-control Neurofeedback in the Treatment of Dysregulated Affect in Borderline Personality Disorder
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is characterized by self-mutilation, suicidality, and severe interpersonal disturbances. These symptoms reflect pervasive emotion regulation problems. On the neural level, BPD patients show an inflated amygdala response to emotional cues. In addition, they have reduced neural control of the amygdala. The amygdala controls emotional experience and behavior. Therefore, current psychobiological theories consider amygdala hyper-activity a causal mechanism for emotional overreaction in BPD.
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) allows the recording of activation in subcortical brain regions, such as the amygdala, in real time. Live feedback from brain activation (e.g. via a thermometer with the temperature reflecting the degree of activation) allows one to learn the voluntary control of the brain. Dubbed "neurofeedback" (NF), the method can result in long-lasting changes in neural activation patterns. NF allows precise targeting of dysfunctional neuro-circuitries that relate to clinical symptoms.
The project proposed here investigates the clinical effectivity of fMRI-based amygdala-NF training in BPD. In total, 164 patients will participate in four training sessions provided by four study centers: Tuebingen, Freiburg, Giessen, and Mannheim. The training aims to reduce affective instability in everyday life, which is assessed primarily by ambulatory assessment before and after treatment. During NF sessions, patients receive feedback from the BOLD (Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent) signal recorded in the amygdala while they view pictures with negative emotional content. The amygdala responds to these pictures with an activation increase. The patient observes the amygdala responding, illustrated via increased temperature in a thermometer beside the picture. The task is to decrease temperature. The procedure should teach patients to master overreaction at an early stage of neural emotion processing.
To assess the effectivity of amygdala-NF, a control group receives non-veridical feedback from a different patient. The investigators expect a significant reduction in affective instability with amygdala-NF. In addition, the investigators expect a greater reduction in affective instability in the amygdala-NF group versus the control group.
The trial will go through two stages of recruitment. Stage 1 is reached after recruitment of 82 participants. An interim analysis will be conducted. Depending on the results of the interim analysis, the trial will enter stage 2, ie. recruitment of the full number of planned participants.
Results from this study enable assessment of clinical efficacy of amygdala-NF. In the future, NF could serve as a precise tool for person-centered treatment of affective instability symptoms in mental disorders with severe emotion regulation problems such as BPD.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Phase 2
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Christian Paret-Voigt, Dr.
- Phone Number: +4962117034462
- Email: christian.paret@zi-mannheim.de
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Miroslava Hofmanová
- Phone Number: +4962117034463
- Email: miroslava.hofmanova@zi-mannheim.de
Study Locations
-
-
-
Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany, 79104
- Recruiting
- University Clinic Freiburg
-
Contact:
- Simon Maier, Dr.
- Phone Number: +49 (0) 761 65530
- Email: psy.brainsteady@uniklinik-freiburg.de
-
Giessen, Germany, 35392
- Recruiting
- University clinic Giessen
-
Contact:
- Christian Schoenholz, Dr.
- Phone Number: +49 (0) 641 985 45702
- Email: Sekretariat-Mulert@psychiat.med.uni-giessen.de
-
Halle, Germany
- Not yet recruiting
- University Clinic Halle (Saale)
-
Contact:
- Jana Weise
- Phone Number: +49-345-557-3795
- Email: jana.weise@uk-halle.de
-
Hamburg, Germany
- Recruiting
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
-
Contact:
- Gregor Leicht
- Phone Number: +49-40-7410-59520
- Email: g.leicht@uke.de
-
Mannheim, Germany, 68159
- Recruiting
- Central Institute of Mental Health
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Miroslava Jindrova, Msc.
-
Contact:
- Christian Paret, Dr.
- Phone Number: 4462 +49 621 1703
- Email: brainsteady-teilnehmen@zi-mannheim.de
-
Contact:
- Miroslava Jindrová
- Phone Number: 4463 +49 621 1703
- Email: brainsteady-teilnehmen@zi-mannheim.de
-
Tübingen, Germany, 72076
- Recruiting
- University Clinic Tuebingen
-
Contact:
- Beatrix Barth, Dr.
- Phone Number: +49 (0) 761 65530
- Email: brainsteady@med.uni-tuebingen.de
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Stage 1: 82 patients, stage 2: 82 patients Inclusion Criteria
- 18-65 years
- Diagnosis of Borderline Personality Disorder
- Insufficient response to ≥2 therapies.
- Sufficient German language skills to give informed consent to the study, to understand questions posed by used instruments, and capable of completing the fMRI tasks
- Ability of subject to understand character and individual consequences of clinical investigation
- Written informed consent (must be available before enrollment in the clinical investigation)
- For women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) adequate contraception.
Exclusion Criteria
- Treatment with benzodiazepines within 7 days prior the initial screening
- Current alcohol or substance dependence
- Meeting the diagnostic criteria for a psychotic disorder or schizophrenia (life-time), as determined by clinical interview at initial screening
- Current or history of significant neurological condition (such as stroke, traumatic brain injury, space occupying lesions, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, vascular dementia, transient ischemic attack)
- Significant visual impairment that might interfere with the performance of the behavioural tasks or fMRI tasks
- Change of treatment (psychopharmacologic, psychological) 2 weeks prior to study participation or before completion of the post-assessment.
- Treatment with any neurofeedback three months prior to or during the study participation.
- Unable or unwilling to comply with study procedures, including study prohibitions and restrictions
- History of claustrophobia or inability to tolerate scanner environment
- Fulfilling any of the MRI contraindications on the standard site radiography screening questionnaire (e.g. history of surgery involving metal implants)
- Clinically relevant structural brain abnormality as determined by prior MRI scan
- Planned medical treatment within the study period that might interfere with the study procedures
- Participants deemed to be at significant risk of serious violence or suicide
- BMI of 16.5 or lower
- Participation in other clinical trials or observation period of competing trials, respectively
- Previous participation in this trial
- Pregnancy and lactation
- Held in an institution by legal or official order
- Legally incapacitated.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention group
Real-time functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) neurofeedback from the Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) signal of the amygdala
|
Real-time fMRI neurofeedback from amygdala's blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal + negative emotional picture viewing.
Instruction to regulate feedback via down-regulation of one's emotional response.
|
|
Experimental: Control group
Feedback that is less correlated with amygdala BOLD signal
|
Recorded neurofeedback from a different participant + negative emotional picture viewing.
Instruction to regulate feedback via down-regulation of one's emotional response.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Affect Intensity, change from T0 to T1
Time Frame: Completion of T0 EMA sampling within 12 days before first NF session. Start of T1 EMA sampling within 1 week after last NF session.
|
Mean score of negative affect scale measured via experience sampling using ecological momentary assessment (EMA).
Scale can take values from 1 to 7, high values mean higher affect intensity.
EMA is conducted across 4 consecutive days, including a full weekend, when patients carry a smartphone that runs the EMA app.
The app sends an auditory signal every hour, starting at 9 AM until 9 PM, to remind the patient to fill out the items.
|
Completion of T0 EMA sampling within 12 days before first NF session. Start of T1 EMA sampling within 1 week after last NF session.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Affect Intensity, change from T0 to T2
Time Frame: Completion of T0 EMA sampling within 12 days before first NF session. Start of T2 EMA sampling within 14-16 weeks after last NF session.
|
Mean score of negative affect scale measured via experience sampling using ecological momentary assessment (EMA).
Scale can take values from 1 to 7, high values mean higher affect intensity.
EMA is conducted across 4 consecutive days, including a full weekend, when patients carry a smartphone that runs the EMA app.
The app sends an auditory signal every hour, starting at 9 AM until 9 PM, to remind the patient to fill out the items.
|
Completion of T0 EMA sampling within 12 days before first NF session. Start of T2 EMA sampling within 14-16 weeks after last NF session.
|
|
Borderline Symptom Severity, change from T0 to T1 and T0 to T2
Time Frame: T0 assessed before first NF session (within 1-3 weeks). T1 assessed after last NF session (within 2-4 weeks). T2 assessed within 14-16 weeks after last NF session.
|
Zanarini Rating Scale for BPD, interview version (ZAN-BPD) total score.
Total score can take values 0-36 with higher values meaning higher symptom burden.
|
T0 assessed before first NF session (within 1-3 weeks). T1 assessed after last NF session (within 2-4 weeks). T2 assessed within 14-16 weeks after last NF session.
|
|
Improvement in quality-adjusted life years (QALY), change from T0 to T3
Time Frame: T0 assessed before first nf session (within 1-3 weeks). T3 assessed 6 months after last NF session.
|
We measure health-related quality of life with the AQoL-6D (Centre for Health Economics, Monash University, 2016), a multi attribute utility instrument frequently used in health economic evaluations.
We elicit quality adjusted life years (QALYs) from the AQoL-6D unweighted scorings by using established value sets.
The derived QALYs range from 0.00 to 1.00, where 0.00 represents death and 1.00 a year in perfect health.
We combine effects (QALYs) and costs of utilization between groups to receive incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER).
Thus, we are able to present costs per QALY for the neurofeedback intervention to inform stakeholders in health care about reimbursement decisions.
|
T0 assessed before first nf session (within 1-3 weeks). T3 assessed 6 months after last NF session.
|
|
Amygdala response, change from T0 to T1.
Time Frame: Time Frame: T0 assessed at Baseline. T1 assessed at Post-Assessment immediately after treatment.
|
BOLD-fMRI response in the amygdala to negative stimuli in the view-condition, during NF session 1, run 1, vs. last NF session, last run.
|
Time Frame: T0 assessed at Baseline. T1 assessed at Post-Assessment immediately after treatment.
|
|
Amygdala self-regulation, change from T0 to T1.
Time Frame: Time Frame: T0 assessed at Baseline. T1 assessed at Post-Assessment immediately after treatment.
|
BOLD-fMRI response in the amygdala to negative stimuli in the regulate-condition, during NF session 1, run 1, vs. last NF session, last run.
|
Time Frame: T0 assessed at Baseline. T1 assessed at Post-Assessment immediately after treatment.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Christian Paret-Voigt, Dr., ZI Mannheim
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Paret C, Kluetsch R, Zaehringer J, Ruf M, Demirakca T, Bohus M, Ende G, Schmahl C. Alterations of amygdala-prefrontal connectivity with real-time fMRI neurofeedback in BPD patients. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016 Jun;11(6):952-60. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsw016. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
- Paret C, Kluetsch R, Ruf M, Demirakca T, Hoesterey S, Ende G, Schmahl C. Down-regulation of amygdala activation with real-time fMRI neurofeedback in a healthy female sample. Front Behav Neurosci. 2014 Sep 18;8:299. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00299. eCollection 2014.
- Zaehringer J, Ende G, Santangelo P, Kleindienst N, Ruf M, Bertsch K, Bohus M, Schmahl C, Paret C. Improved emotion regulation after neurofeedback: A single-arm trial in patients with borderline personality disorder. Neuroimage Clin. 2019;24:102032. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.102032. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
- Paret C, Jindrova M, Kleindienst N, Eck J, Breman H, Luhrs M, Barth B, Ethofer T, Fallgatter AJ, Goebel R, Hoell A, Lockhofen D, Reinhold AS, Maier S, Matthies S, Mulert C, Schonholz C, van Elst LT, Schmahl C. A randomised controlled trial of amygdala fMRI-neurofeedback versus sham-feedback in borderline-personality disorder - systematic literature review and introduction to the BrainSTEADy trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 8;25(1):687. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-07000-1.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- BrainSTEADy
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.