3-Dimensional Virtual Reality Modelling With Intravascular Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Mapping for Targeted Pulmonary Segmental Resection Trial

January 29, 2026 updated by: Wael Hanna, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton

With the advent of CT screening for lung cancer, an increasing number of NSCLCs are being detected at very early stages, and the demand for pulmonary segmentectomy is rising rapidly. As such, there is a need to develop new surgical techniques to facilitate minimally invasive pulmonary segmentectomy, as segmentectomy may provide a number of significant advantages over lobectomy for patients presenting with early-stage lung cancer, or for patients unable to undergo a full lobectomy due to existing comorbidities. This study will provide the first case series using preoperative 3D virtual reality (VR) anatomical planning (Elucis) added to ICG and NIF-guided robotic segmentectomy to date and will be the first reported use of Elucis-guided targeted pulmonary segmental resection in Canada. As lung cancer is the most frequently fatal cancer in North America, many thousands of patients will be able to benefit from this operation every year.

If successful, this project will establish a novel operation that has the potential of increasing the rates of success for segmental resection. This will allow for further research that will externally validate this technique and ensure that it is reproducible in other centres by other surgeons. As segmental resection is the new standard of care for surgical management of early-stage NSCLC, and because lung cancer is the most frequently fatal cancer in North America, many thousands of patients will be able to benefit from this operation every year.

Equally importantly, the investigators believe that this method will enable them to develop a new way of teaching lung resections, in a manner that is more effective for learners. Further research on the role of VR in teaching lung cancer surgery will very likely be a downstream effect of developing this surgical method.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Segmental resection is the new standard of care for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, minimally invasive segmental resection is very difficult to perform, due to high inconsistency and variation in segmental anatomy, and the lack of clearly visible tissue planes between segments (intersegmental planes). The investigators have demonstrated that the rate of successful completion of a segmental resection is only 60%. As such, segmental resections are unlikely to become widely adopted by surgeons outside of centres of high volume expertise, unless an adjunct to facilitate and improve the success rate of this operation is developed. In this trial, the investigators propose to use 3-dimensional (3D) virtual reality (VR) modelling to plan, simulate, and execute segmental resections. The investigators believe that this adjunct will improve the rate of successful completion of this operation.

This submission proposes a novel operation for segmental resections of the lung. Segmental resections are extremely difficult to perform because of the high rate of anatomical variations in segmental anatomy, and the lack of visible tissue planes between segments. In the largest prospective series on segmental resection, the investigators demonstrated that the rate of completion was only 60%. The investigators therefore conducted a subsequent trial utilizing 3D preoperative anatomical planning (Synapse 3D) in conjunction with intraoperative NIF-mapping using intravascular ICG in order to increase the rate of successful completion of a segmental resection. However, planned interim analyses has shown that there is no difference in the rate of successful completion of a segmental resection using Synapse 3D or NIF. This is likely the case because the investigators are using 2D models to plan a 3D operation. In this submission, the investigators hypothesize that adding 3D VR preoperative anatomical planning (Elucis) to NIF-guided segmental resection can greatly increase the rate of success of segmental resections. In this Phase I trial, the investigators propose to describe the technical details of this novel operation, and to evaluate it for safety, feasibility, and learning curve. If successful, this would be the first trial to do so, and would allow for further Phase II and III comparative trials to evaluate this operation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

89

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8N 4A6
        • St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Waël C Hanna, MDCM, MBA, FRCSC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >/= 18 years
  • Tumour size < 3 cm
  • Clinical Stage 1 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
  • CT-imaging confirming that the tumour is confined to one broncho-pulmonary segment, rendering the patient a candidate for segmental resection.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hypersensitivity or allergy to ICG, sodium iodide, or iodine
  • Women who are currently pregnant or breastfeeding; or women of childbearing potential who are not currently taking adequate birth control.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 3D VR Modelling (Elucis) with Intravascular Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Mapping
All patients in Phase I and those randomized to Intervention in Phase II will have preoperative 3D VR reconstructions of their pulmonary anatomy with the target lesion created using the Elucis platform.
All patients in Phase I and those randomized to Intervention in Phase II will have preoperative 3D VR reconstructions of their pulmonary anatomy with the target lesion created using the Elucis platform. Segment identification and confidence rating will be collected before and after visualizing the 3D VR reconstruction. Intraoperatively, the surgeon will use this 3D VR model as a guide to determine which inflow and outflow vessels to the involved segment need to be removed. After vascular ligation, a 8mL bolus of ICG solution will be injected into a peripheral vein catheter by anesthesia. The surgeon will mark out the segmental plane based on the fluorescence pattern seen on the infrared mode of the robotic camera. The surgeon will then perform the pulmonary resection and the resected non-fluorescent lung segment will be extracted from the body cavity. Study patients will receive routine postoperative care as non-study patients and will be followed until the 3-4-week mark.
Active Comparator: 3D Modelling (Synapse 3D) with Intravascular Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Mapping
The patients that are randomized to Control in Phase II will undergo the same intervention as above, but instead of using Elucis for 3D VR reconstructions, Synapse 3D will be used for 3D reconstructions.
The patients that are randomized to Control in Phase II will undergo the same intervention as above, but instead of using Elucis for 3D VR reconstructions, Synapse 3D will be used for 3D reconstructions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Phase I: Feasibility of the operation
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Based on the proportion of completed minimally invasive segmental resections. A rate of 60%, similar to the established current standard, will be considered adequate.
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Phase I: Safety of the operation
Time Frame: 30-days from date of surgery
Based on rates of perioperative complications within 30-days of surgery, as defined by the Ottawa Thoracic Morbidity & Mortality (TMNM) System.
30-days from date of surgery
Phase I: Surgeon's learning curve
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Evaluated using CUSUM analysis of operative time and successful segmentectomy completion rate over time.
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Phase II: Rate of conversion to robotic lobectomy in each arm
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Evaluated based on the proportion of minimally invasive segmental resections converted to robotic lobectomy in each arm.
Through study completion, an average of 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Waël C Hanna, MDCM, MBA, FRCSC, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton / McMaster University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 3, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 15, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe