Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Microstent Positioning

February 25, 2026 updated by: Rachel Simpson, University of Utah

Post-operative Anterior Segment OCT Evaluation of Trabecular Microstent Positioning and the Impact on Intraocular Pressure

The goal of this observational study is to learn about the long-term results of glaucoma stent surgery in men and women 18 or older who have had cataract and microstent surgery in the past 2 years at the Moran Eye Center. The main questions the study aims to answer are:

  1. How often are microstents mispositioned?
  2. What effect does microstent positioning have on intraocular pressure after surgery?

Participants will have a one-time clinic visit for an eye exam and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) .

From the eye exam and OCT, Researchers will assess and categorize the position of the microstents and assess the Schlemm's canal dilation.

Researchers will review the participants' medical records to acquire 2-year data for the following:

  1. Surgeon type and level of experience (resident, fellow, attending ophthalmologist)
  2. Proportions of proper gonioscopic placement intraoperatively for each surgeon group
  3. Effectiveness of surgery, based on change in intraocular pressure (IOP) from baseline medicated IOP, number of IOP-lowering medications the patient was able to discontinue, and rate of need for additional glaucoma surgery.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

116

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Utah
      • Murray, Utah, United States, 84107
        • Moran Eye Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population comes from the Moran Eye Center, which is part of an academic teaching hospital and includes multiple community clinic locations.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any adult glaucoma patient (age 18+) who underwent Hydrus microstent or iStent Inject placement at the Moran Eye Center.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any patient who subsequently had to have their stent removed for any reason, any patient with a history of trauma to the anterior segment or reconstruction altering typical anatomy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Hydrus microstent
Participants in this group underwent Hydrus microstent placement at the Moran Eye Center.
Both the Hydrus microstent and iStent Inject W are used in combination with cataract surgery, in order to help lower intraocular pressure for patients with open-angle glaucoma. The microstent is a small flexible device that is inserted into the eye during cataract surgery in order to improve the outflow of fluid from the eye.
iStent Inject
Participants in this group underwent iStent Inject placement at the Moran Eye Center.
Both the Hydrus microstent and iStent Inject W are used in combination with cataract surgery, in order to help lower intraocular pressure for patients with open-angle glaucoma. The microstent is a small flexible device that is inserted into the eye during cataract surgery in order to improve the outflow of fluid from the eye.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in percentage of mispositioned stents between Hydrus microstent and iStent groups
Time Frame: Two years post stent placement

Positioning of each participant's stent(s) will be evaluated by anterior segment OCT at the one-time clinical study visit.

iStent Inject W mispositions are defined as: microstent protrusion (entire conical head not within canal), stent completely buried in the trabeculae, or not seen (i.e. 0 or only 1 stent). If the iStent position is located but the examiner is unsure if it is positioned correctly, it will be counted as misposition. If the iStent is not seen, an in office gonioscopy will be performed to confirm results. Visualization of three stents is not considered a misposition.

Hydrus mispositions are defined as: distal tip not in canal, at least 1 window not in canal, or trabecular microstent not within transition zone.

The between group difference of mispositioned stents will be calculated in percentage.

Two years post stent placement

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dilation of Schlemm's canal
Time Frame: Two years post stent placement
The Schlemm's canal is a circular lymphatic-like vessel in the eye that maintains fluid homeostasis by draining aqueous humor from the eye into the systemic circulation. If the canal is blocked, the pressure in the eye can increase, resulting in glaucoma. Dilation will be visualized on OCT and graded on a numerical scale 1-3 (1=dilated, 2=some dilation, 3=no dilation) at the one-time study visit.
Two years post stent placement
Change in IOP from baseline
Time Frame: Two years post stent placement
IOP is measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). A retrospective chart review will be conducted to acquire 2-year data to determine the change in each participant's IOP from baseline. The between group difference of change in IOP will be calculated in percentage.
Two years post stent placement
Reduction in number of IOP lowering medications
Time Frame: Two years post stent placement
A retrospective chart review will be conducted to determine how many IOP lowering medications each patient is using at 2 years post-stent placement compared to the number of IOP lowering medications they were using prior to stent placement. The between group difference of reduction in number of medications will be calculated in percentage.
Two years post stent placement
Percentage of patients needing additional glaucoma surgery
Time Frame: Two years post stent placement
A retrospective chart review will be conducted to determine the percentage of patients who had additional glaucoma surgery by the two-year post stent placement timepoint. The between group difference in number of patients needing additional glaucoma surgery will be calculated in percentage.
Two years post stent placement
Sub-analysis of primary outcome by surgeon type
Time Frame: Two years post stent placement
There will be a sub-analysis of the percentage of mispositions (primary endpoint) by level of surgeon experience. A retrospective chart review of the intraoperative note will determine if the primary surgeon was a resident or non-resident (attending or fellow).
Two years post stent placement
Proportion of stent cases with proper placement via anterior segment OCT versus proportion of cases with proper placement via intraoperative gonioscopy
Time Frame: Two years post stent placement
The intraoperative notes at the time of stent placement will include confirmation of proper stent placement via gonioscopy. At the time of the study visit, stent placement will be assessed via anterior segment OCT. The number of correctly positioned stent placements will be reported in percentages.
Two years post stent placement

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rachel Simpson, MD, Moran Eye Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 9, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 21, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 29, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 31, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 163214

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe