Pathological Positivity Rate in Prostate Cancer Patients with PI-RADS 4 and First Negative Biopsy

November 5, 2024 updated by: Tao Tao, MD, Anhui Provincial Hospital

A Prospective Clinical Study Based on USTC Diagnostic Model and PSMA/PET-CT for Direct Radical Prostatectomy in Some Patients with First Negative Biopsy

The purpose of this prospective, single-center, single-arm trial was to evaluate the pathologic type of re-treatment based on a clear PI-RADS score of ≥4 with a first negative prostate biopsy, belonging to the high-risk group of the USTC diagnostic model, and PSMA PET/CT positive patients, and to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of the USTC diagnostic model combined with PSMA PET/CT. At the same time, to explore whether these patients can directly undergo radical prostatectomy without repeated puncture.

Firstly, patients with PI-RADS≥4 scores were screened and the first prostate biopsy was negative. Then USTC diagnostic model was used to evaluate the risk probability of patients suffering from csPCa to determine whether the patients belonged to the high-risk group. Then PSMA/PET-CT was improved for patients in high-risk group to identify the positive lesions of prostate. Finally, for patients with ≥4 PI-RADS and negative prostate aspiration for the first time, Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) was performed compared with high-risk groups of USTC diagnostic model and positive PSMA PET/CT. Transperineal targeted prostate biopsy was performed if intraoperative freeze pathology indicated prostate cancer, then LRP was performed; intraoperative freeze pathology indicated benign prostate biopsy, then transperineal prostate biopsy was performed.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Research design This is a prospective, single-center, single-arm, open-label clinical study conducted at the First Affiliated Hospital of the University of Science and Technology of China. Patients with no contraindications to surgery and who meet enrollment criteria will be included in the study. Subsequently, the investigators will recommend that these patients be treated again for PI-RADS≥4, first negative prostate puncture, high-risk group of USTC diagnostic model, and PSMA PET/CT positive patients. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) was directly performed. Transperineal targeted prostate biopsy was performed if intraoperative freeze pathology indicated prostate cancer, then LRP was performed; intraoperative freeze pathology indicated benign prostate biopsy, then transperineal prostate biopsy was performed.

The diagnostic efficacy of USTC diagnostic model combined with PSMA PET/CT was evaluated according to the pathological results of LRP postoperative specimens or prostate biopsy specimens, and whether such patients can directly undergo radical prostatectomy without repeated puncture was also discussed. Before surgery, patients and their families should be fully informed of the surgical risks, the necessity of pathologic confirmation of prostate biopsy, the possibility of benign prostate lesions, and other alternative treatments, including active monitoring, radiotherapy, and focal therapy.

Screening and registration This study consisted of a prostate cancer diagnostic model and a tandem examination of 18F-Prostate-specific membrane antigen 1007 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT).

For patients with PI-RADS≥4 and negative prostate puncture for the first time, the prostate magnetic resonance score was re-evaluated three months later. For patients with PI-RADS still ≥4, the serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test and multi-parameter magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) were completed. Prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1 (PI-RADS v2.1) score information were obtained. Then through online diagnosis chart (website: https://ustcprostatecancerprediction.shinyapps.io/dynnomapp/) patients with clinically significant probability of the risk of prostate cancer (csPCa). When the csPCa prediction probability is equal to or greater than 0.60, 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT is used for further diagnosis. If a patient is still considered to have csPCa after an 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT examination, the investigators define this as a positive result. These patients met our study criteria. Notably, patients with a predicted probability of less than 0.60 will no longer receive 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT, and patients with a risk probability equal to or greater than 0.60 but negative 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT will not meet the inclusion criteria.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Anhui
      • Hefei, Anhui, China, 230001
        • Recruiting
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Tao Tao, MD Ph.D

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

  • PI-RADS≥4 scores and the first prostate biopsy was negative
  • USTC clinical diagnosis model calculated risk probability value ≥0.6
  • Reexamination of PSMA/PET-CT after the first puncture indicated positive prostatic lesions

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • PI-RADS≥4 scores and the first prostate biopsy was negative
  • USTC clinical diagnosis model calculated risk probability value ≥0.6
  • Reexamination of PSMA/PET-CT after the first puncture indicated positive prostatic lesions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Life expectancy is less than 15 years
  • Multiple metastasis of tumor is possible
  • There are serious cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, bleeding tendencies and other surgical or puncture contraindications

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Reexamination pathologic positive rate of target patients
Time Frame: 2024-2025
2024-2025

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Tao Tao, MD Ph.D, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 30, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 3, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

November 7, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 7, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe