Effectiveness and Safety of OSTENIL® TENDON in the Treatment of Pain and Restricted Mobility in Tendon Disorders

August 3, 2026 updated by: TRB Chemedica AG
PMCF study to further substantiate the effectiveness and safety of OSTENIL® TENDON in the overall as well as indication-specific treatment of pain and restricted mobility in four different tendon disorders (patella tendon, peroneal tendon, medial epicondylus humeri and iliotibial band) in a real-life clinical setting when used according to the instructions for use.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

84

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Berlin, Germany, 13589
        • Recruiting
        • Orthopädie am Kiesteich
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Frederic Braun, Dr. med.
      • Berlin, Germany, 14197
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Orthopädie Dr. Bentzin
      • Berlin, Germany, 10627
        • Completed
        • ATOS MVZ meviva Berlin
      • Potsdam, Germany, 14482
        • Completed
        • Orthopädische Praxis Dr. Fischer
    • State of Berlin
      • Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany, 14195
        • Recruiting
        • Orthopädische Gemeinschaftspraxis ÜBAG
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Frank Klufmöller, Dr. med.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients over 18 years of age with symptomatic tendinopathy (patella tendon, peroneal tendon, medial epicondylus humeri or iliotibial band) and a recommendation for OSTENIL® TENDON treatment.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient aged between 18 and 99 years
  • Diagnosis of symptomatic tendinopathy (patella tendon, peroneal tendon, medial epicondylus humeri or iliotibial band)
  • Physician's recommendation to use OSTENIL® TENDON prior to recruitment
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of any contra-indication or precautionary condition listed in the instructions for use, i.e.,

    • Ascertained hypersensitivity to any of the OSTENIL® TENDON constituents
    • Known pregnancy or breast feeding
    • Acute trauma
  • Use of the following treatments (the given time intervals refer to the date of inclusion):

    • Local* OSTENIL® TENDON or other hyaluronic acid (HA) treatment within the last 6 months
    • Local* platelet-rich plasma (PRP) treatment within the last 3 months
    • Local* corticosteroid treatment (without time restriction)
    • Local* extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) within the last 4 weeks
    • Local* phytotherapy (e.g., Traumeel®) within the last 4 weeks
    • Local* surgical intervention (without time restriction)
    • Systemic corticosteroid treatment within the last 4 weeks
    • Repeated use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) and/or other analgesics within the last week
    • Physiotherapy (therapeutic exercises and physical therapy), ortheses, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) or acupuncture within the last week
  • Diagnosis of chronic inflammatory disease (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, Bechterew disease, Crohn's disease, etc.) prior to inclusion
  • Participation in a clinical investigation within the last 6 months
  • Vulnerable patient (individual who is unable to fully understand all aspects of the study that are relevant to the decision to participate, or who could be manipulated or unduly influenced as a result of a compromised position, expectation of benefits or fear of retaliatory response [including persons needing legally designated representatives, illiterate persons or persons with insufficient knowledge of local language])

(* local refers to the treatment of the study-relevant tendon)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
OSTENIL® TENDON
2 injections of sodium hayluronate 2 % (40 milligrams (mg) / 2.0 millilitres (ml)) in weekly interval.
OSTENIL® TENDON is a CE-certified viscoelastic solution intended for peritendinous or intrasheath injection, containing 2 % sodium hyaluronate from fermentation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of pain intensity 3 months after end of treatment compared to baseline (visual analogue scale)
Time Frame: Baseline compared to week 12 after the end of treatment.
Evaluation of pain intensity by the patient on a 100 mm visual analogue scale. 100 mm equals the worst pain.
Baseline compared to week 12 after the end of treatment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Adverse Events with (possible/probable) causal relationship with the device or application procedure
Time Frame: Up to week 24 after the end of treatment.
Up to week 24 after the end of treatment.
Incidence of Serious Adverse Events with (possible/probable) causal relationship with the device or application procedure
Time Frame: Up to week 24 after the end of treatment.
Up to week 24 after the end of treatment.
Incidence of (Presumably) serious incidents
Time Frame: Up to week 24 after the end of treatment.
Up to week 24 after the end of treatment.
Incidence of Device Deficiencies
Time Frame: Up to week 24 after the end of treatment.
Up to week 24 after the end of treatment.
Change of Upper -/ Lower Extremity Functional Scale compared to baseline
Time Frame: Baseline compared to week 1 as well as weeks 4, 12 and 24 after the end of treatment.
Indication specific patient questionnaire to assess effectiveness of treatment on a 5-point Likert scale (range: 0 = extreme difficulty to perform activity to 4 = no difficulty).
Baseline compared to week 1 as well as weeks 4, 12 and 24 after the end of treatment.
Change of pain intensity compared to baseline (visual analogue scale)
Time Frame: Baseline compared to week 1 as well as weeks 4 and 24 after the end of treatment.
Evaluation of pain intensity by the patient on a 100 mm visual analogue scale. 100 mm equals the worst pain.
Baseline compared to week 1 as well as weeks 4 and 24 after the end of treatment.
Change of patient-reported outcome measures (PROM)
Time Frame: Baseline (except satifaction with treatment), week 1 and weeks 4, 12 and 24 after the end of treatment.
Patient questionnaire to assess the following aspects (100 mm visual analogue scale; 100 mm equals a worse outcome): pain, global and tendon-associated quality of life, daily activities, clinical global impression, mobility and satisfaction with treatment (note: not assessed at baseline)
Baseline (except satifaction with treatment), week 1 and weeks 4, 12 and 24 after the end of treatment.
Change of investigator-reported outcome measures
Time Frame: Baseline (except satisfaction with treatment), week 1 and weeks 4, 12 and 24 after the end of treatment.

Investigator inquiry to record the perception of the physician of the following aspects (100 mm visual analogue scale; 100 mm equals a worse outcome):

clinical global impression regarding the clinical severity of the tendinopathy and satisfaction with the treatment (note: not assessed at baseline)

Baseline (except satisfaction with treatment), week 1 and weeks 4, 12 and 24 after the end of treatment.
Degree of tendinopathy
Time Frame: Baseline, week 1 and weeks 4, 12 and 24 after the end of treatment
Evaluation of tendinopathy symptoms by the patient by rating tendon pain in the context of a patient-defined task that usually elicits pain (4 stages; 4 equals a worse outcome)
Baseline, week 1 and weeks 4, 12 and 24 after the end of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Olaf Neubert, Dr. med., Orthopädie am Kiesteich

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 25, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 7, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 8, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2026

Last Verified

August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • OTIPPE-PMCF-DE-2021

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Proprietary company data will not be shared externally.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe