Immediate Versus Conventional Loading of Early Placed Dental Implant Supporting Single Crowns

November 14, 2024 updated by: Mohammad AL-Rababáh, University of Jordan

Immediate Versus Conventional Loading of Early Placed Dental Implant Supporting Single Crowns: a Randomized Controlled Trial

This study focuses on examining the efficacy and clinical performance of immediate loading of early placed single implants.

The aim of the randomized controlled trial is to compare between two loading protocols (immediate versus conventional) of early placed implants (Type 2-3A) in terms of clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes.

Null hypothesis: There will be no significant differences in implant survival/success, stability, radiographic marginal bone level, and patient reported outcomes between immediately or conventionally loaded and early placed implants.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Study design:

This study is designed as a parallel group randomized controlled trial with an allocation ratio of 1:1.

The (PICO) study design: population will be patients from Jordan University Hospital aged 18 years or older, requiring single tooth replacement (molar or premolar) with dental implants, with sufficient bone volume and controlled oral hygiene. The intervention group will receive immediate loading of early placed implants (within 1 week), while the comparator group will receive conventional loading (after more than 8 weeks). The primary outcome is changes in marginal bone levels, and the secondary outcomes include implant primary osseointegration, stability, patient satisfaction, and various complications.

Both groups will receive early placed implants after 8-12 weeks of healing (Type 2-3A placement). The surgical procedure will follow standardized protocols, with no variations between groups other than the loading time.

Blinded assessors will perform radiographic and clinical evaluations at designated follow-up visits: at implant placement, definitive loading, 6 months, and 1 year. Ethical approval is obtained prior to study commencement, and all participants will provide informed consent.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Amman, Jordan
        • Recruiting
        • Jordan University Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. aged 18 years or older
  2. requiring single tooth replacement with dental implants in presence of four bone walls (mandible or maxilla)
  3. having adequate bone volume
  4. controlled oral hygiene
  5. having agreed to take part in the study and willing to comply with the study protocol and follow-up visits

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any systemic condition that might jeopardize implant surgery
  2. history of radiation therapy to the head and neck region
  3. history of bisphosphonate therapy or other medications that may affect bone metabolism
  4. smoking more than 10 cigarettes/day
  5. history of bruxism or parafunctional habits
  6. localized/generalized periodontitis
  7. patients in need of bone grafting
  8. any known allergy or hypersensitivity to implant materials

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional loading of early placed implants
Early placed implants ( within 16 weeks of healing after Extraction of a tooth) will be conventionally loaded ( at least 8 weeks after implant placement )
Implants with active thread design will be used. The implants placed will be randomly allocated into either immediate loading or conventional loading group.
Definitive loading of early placed implants upon successful osteointegration (after 8 weks)
Experimental: Immediate loading of early placed implants
Early placed implants (within 16 weeks of tooth extraction) will be loaded immediately with provisional screw retained crown
Implants with active thread design will be used. The implants placed will be randomly allocated into either immediate loading or conventional loading group.
Definitive loading of early placed implants upon successful osteointegration (after 8 weks)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Marginal bone level changes
Time Frame: Baseline (day of implant placement), at definitive loading (more than 8 weeks post-placement for the conventional loading group, within 1 week post-placement for the immediate loading group), and at 1-year follow-up post-loading.
Marginal bone level changes by standardized periapical radiographs.
Baseline (day of implant placement), at definitive loading (more than 8 weeks post-placement for the conventional loading group, within 1 week post-placement for the immediate loading group), and at 1-year follow-up post-loading.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Implant failure rate
Time Frame: 1 year
defined as implant removal
1 year
Implant stability
Time Frame: Baseline (day of implant placement), at definitive loading (more than 8 weeks post-placement for the conventional loading group, within 1 week post-placement for the immediate loading group)
Osstell readings
Baseline (day of implant placement), at definitive loading (more than 8 weeks post-placement for the conventional loading group, within 1 week post-placement for the immediate loading group)
Midfacial mucosal level
Time Frame: at time of delivery of definitive prosthesis (more than 8 weeks post-placement for the conventional loading group, within 1 week post-placement for the immediate loading group) and one-year follow-up
as measured by periodontal probe
at time of delivery of definitive prosthesis (more than 8 weeks post-placement for the conventional loading group, within 1 week post-placement for the immediate loading group) and one-year follow-up
Pink and white esthetic scores
Time Frame: at time of delivery of definitive prosthesis (more than 8 weeks post-placement for the conventional loading group, within 1 week post-placement for the immediate loading group) and one-year follow-up
at time of delivery of definitive prosthesis (more than 8 weeks post-placement for the conventional loading group, within 1 week post-placement for the immediate loading group) and one-year follow-up
Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: after 6 months and 1 year of placements
To be assesses by oral health impact profile-14 (OHIP-14), The scale includes 14 items covering various aspects of oral health-related quality of life, Score Range: from 0 to 56, Higher OHIP-14 scores indicate a worse outcome, representing a greater negative impact of oral health issues on quality of life, while lower scores suggest a better outcome or less impact on the individual's daily life.
after 6 months and 1 year of placements
Biological, estehtic and technical complications
Time Frame: 1 year
(infection, implant mobility, or prosthesis-related issues) assessed by expert prosthodontist who is blind to the nature of intervention
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 25, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 3, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

November 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe