Effects of Neurodynamic Sliding Versus Eccentric Training on Lower Extremity Function, Strength and Proprioception in Athletes with Short Hamstring Syndrome.

December 22, 2024 updated by: Elif Tuğçe Çil, Yeditepe University

Effects of Neurodynamic Sliding Versus Eccentric Training on Lower Extremity Function, Strength and Proprioception in Athletes with Short Hamstring Syndrome

Hamstring strains are among the most common injuries in field sports, accounting for 10% of all team sports injuries and often leading to long-term absence from activities. Risk factors include older age, previous injuries, reduced flexibility, and strength deficits. The hamstrings play a critical role in dynamic stability and joint preservation, particularly for the hip and knee. While stretching is crucial for injury prevention, there is debate over optimal techniques.

The neurodynamic sliding technique (NST) and eccentric training (ET) are two methods that can improve flexibility and reduce injury risk. This study uniquely combines ET with NST to address hamstring tightness in athletes, aiming to evaluate their effects individually and in combination on knee muscle strength, range of motion, proprioception, and lower limb function compared to a control group.

The hypotheses examine whether these interventions differ in their impact on eccentric and concentric knee strength, the knee flexor/extensor strength ratio, range of motion, proprioception, and dynamic balance (measured via the Y Balance Test). The null hypothesis (H0) proposes no differences, while the alternative hypothesis (H1) suggests significant differences among the intervention methods.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

54

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ataşehir
      • İstanbul, Ataşehir, Turkey
        • Yeditepe University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age between 18-30 years old
  2. Have a normal body mass index (BMI)
  3. Have hamstring tightness as indicated by the results of an SLR examination of less than 75o (39).
  4. Have hamstring tightness as indicated Active Knee Extension Test (AKET) was used to evaluate hamstring shortness. Individuals with AKET angles less than 150 degrees were considered as samples (146).
  5. Ability to perform exercises.
  6. Don't having plates (implants) in the lower limbs.
  7. Not having a history of fracture in the lower limb (with or without realignment process).
  8. Not having history of surgery to repair joint capsules, ligaments, muscles, and nerves,
  9. A history of or experiencing Hernia Nucleus Pulposus (HNP).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Receiving physical therapy or other conventional therapy in the past 6 months.
  2. Absence in one of the pre- or post-test sessions.
  3. Absence of more than two sessions in practice sessions.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
Active Comparator: Eccentric training

The group is consist of 13 participants who did the following treatment protocol:

The Nordic exercise served as the foundation for the intervention, focusing on eccentric loading as participants resisted falling forward. To minimize DOMS and ensure adherence, a two-week preparatory phase of mixed concentric/eccentric leg curls using a stability ball was implemented. Following this, the gradual progression outlined by Mjolsnes et al. led to a four-week Nordic hamstring curl regimen. Weekly supervision ensured proper technique and compliance throughout the program.

The Nordic exercise served as the foundation for the intervention, focusing on eccentric loading as participants resisted falling forward. To minimize DOMS and ensure adherence, a two-week preparatory phase of mixed concentric/eccentric leg curls using a stability ball was implemented. Following this, the gradual progression outlined by Mjolsnes et al. led to a four-week Nordic hamstring curl regimen. Weekly supervision ensured proper technique and compliance throughout the program.
Active Comparator: Neurodynamic sliding technique

The group is consist of 14 participants who did the following treatment protocol:

The neurodynamic sliding technique (NST) was applied to the dominant leg's sciatic nerve in the NST and ETNST groups. The technique involves alternating stress proximally and distally to promote nerve sliding. Participants performed two sets of movements-cervical flexion with knee and ankle flexion, and cervical extension with knee and ankle extension-repeated actively for 60 seconds, five times per session. Over six weeks, both groups underwent three supervised sessions per week led by an experienced researcher.

Following Castellote-Caballero et al., the neurodynamic sliding technique (NST) was applied to the dominant leg's sciatic nerve in the NST and ETNST groups. The technique involves alternating stress proximally and distally to promote nerve sliding. Participants performed two sets of movements-cervical flexion with knee and ankle flexion, and cervical extension with knee and ankle extension-repeated actively for 60 seconds, five times per session. Over six weeks, both groups underwent three supervised sessions per week led by an experienced researcher.
Experimental: Eccentric training and neurodynamic sliding technique

The group consist of 13 participants who did the following treatment protocol:

They underwent a combined treatment incorporating both eccentric training (ET) and the neurodynamic sliding technique (NST). Participants followed the graduated Nordic hamstring exercise protocol for eccentric strengthening, alongside the nerve-sliding movements targeting the sciatic nerve. This combined approach aimed to optimize muscle flexibility, strength, and neural mobility. The interventions were performed over six weeks, with three supervised sessions per week to ensure proper execution and adherence.

The Nordic exercise served as the foundation for the intervention, focusing on eccentric loading as participants resisted falling forward. To minimize DOMS and ensure adherence, a two-week preparatory phase of mixed concentric/eccentric leg curls using a stability ball was implemented. Following this, the gradual progression outlined by Mjolsnes et al. led to a four-week Nordic hamstring curl regimen. Weekly supervision ensured proper technique and compliance throughout the program.
Following Castellote-Caballero et al., the neurodynamic sliding technique (NST) was applied to the dominant leg's sciatic nerve in the NST and ETNST groups. The technique involves alternating stress proximally and distally to promote nerve sliding. Participants performed two sets of movements-cervical flexion with knee and ankle flexion, and cervical extension with knee and ankle extension-repeated actively for 60 seconds, five times per session. Over six weeks, both groups underwent three supervised sessions per week led by an experienced researcher.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Passive Straight Leg Raise (SLR) test
Time Frame: 1-2 minutes
To measure passive hamstring flexibility, participants will lie supine on a bed with their pelvis and opposite thigh secured using straps to prevent compensatory movements. A goniometer will be positioned with its axis at the greater trochanter of the femur, the fixed arm aligned with the midaxillary line, and the moving arm along the lateral malleolus. With the knee extended and the ankle in a neutral position to avoid calf muscle stiffness, the thigh is gently flexed until hamstring tightness is felt. The straight leg's elevation angle will be measured three times, and the average will determine hamstring flexibility. Individuals with an angle less than 75° are classified as having short hamstring muscles.
1-2 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Knee muscle strength
Time Frame: 10 minutes
Quadriceps and hamstring strength will be measured using the Biodex Pro 3 isokinetic device. Participants will sit comfortably with their trunk, pelvis, and thigh secured by straps, and the dynamometer axis aligned with the knee joint's center of rotation. After adjustments for proper positioning, the test leg will be attached to the device. Following familiarization and warm-up contractions, participants will perform maximum effort tests. Strength will be evaluated at angular speeds of 60°/s and 120°/s in both concentric and eccentric modes, with knee joint movement controlled between 0° and 90°.
10 minutes
Knee joint proprioception
Time Frame: 10 minutes
Knee joint proprioception was assessed using the Biodex dynamometer in continuous passive motion mode at a constant speed of 5°/s. Participants sat with knees and hips bent at 90°, aligned with the dynamometer's axis, while wearing a blindfold and pneumatic boot to block visual and tactile cues. The test involved 90° of knee movement, from full extension (0°) to full flexion (90°). After practice trials, participants aimed to identify a target position (60°) during knee flexion and hit an abort button when they believed they reached it. The deviation from the target position was recorded based on three repetitions.
10 minutes
Y balance test
Time Frame: 15 minutes
YBT test performance was assessed with a Y Balance Test Kit. Before assessment, participants were acquainted with the Y-Balance Test (YBT) by practicing on their injured limb. The YBT was performed on a platform. Throughout the task, the standing leg remained on the platform, while the other leg executed error-free maximum reach in three directions: anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral. Maximum distances in each direction, relative to the stance leg, were measured. During the test, participants kept their hands on their waists, and each direction was repeated three times with a 10-second rest between trials.
15 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Elif Tuğçe ÇİL, Assistant Prof. Dr., Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation department, Yeditepe University, istanbul, Turkey

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 4, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 3, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 22, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 22, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MOHAMMADYEDITEPESPORTTHESIS

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hamstring Tightness

Clinical Trials on Eccentric training

Subscribe