Effects of Sub Occipital Muscle Inhibition Technique on Hamstring Flexibility in Post-laminectomy Patients

February 20, 2025 updated by: Riphah International University

Effects of Sub-occipital Muscle Inhibition Technique on Hamstring Flexibility in Post-laminectomy Patients

to find out the effects of sub-occipital muscle inhibition technique in combination with upper cervical spine exercises on hamstring muscle flexibility in post-laminectomy patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Laminectomy is a decompression surgery which is performed to decrease pressure on spinal nerves. In this surgical procedure a small bone of vertebrae called lamina is removed. Hamstring muscle stiffness is a major problem in post-laminectomy patients, which results in chronic pain, functional limitation and affect patients activity of daily life.

In post-laminectomy patients hamstring stiffness is more profound than iliotibial Band and piriformis stiffness. Sub-occipital muscle and hamstring are connected via a single neural pathway called superior back line which passes through dura matter. Dura matter is the outer most covering of meninges, Sub Occipital Muscles attached to dura matter by Myodural Bridge through vertebral dural ligament. This connection provides a window for relaxation of dural fascia to decrease tone of connected muscular-skeletal units (in which hamstring is also included). So if any of these muscle units become tight, or tone deterioration occur the other unit is automatically malfunctioned. The study shows that if tone sub-occipital muscle falls, it has been reported that the tone of knee flexors such as hamstring also decreases due to relaxation of myofascia.

However, in post-laminectomy patients, incorporating a neural pathway connection technique involving sub-occipital muscle inhibition for upper neural pathway Dura release may offer more effective and immediate results on hamstring muscle flexibility in the lower neural pathway The sub-occipital muscle inhibition technique is a method of inducing relaxation of the fascia by applying soft pressure to the sub-occipital area.

The rationale of the present study is to find out the effectiveness of Sub Occipital Muscle inhibition technique for stiff hamstring muscle in post-laminectomy patients, pain and disability. To compare the effectiveness of SOM inhibition technique in combination of upper cervical spine muscle stretching,traction etc. with hamstring muscle stretching, lower limb neurodynamic etc.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

38

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • KPK
      • Swābi, KPK, Pakistan
        • Health and wellness rehabilitation center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Hamstring muscle tightness, (AKE < 80) or (more than 20 degree lag in knee extension).
  • Back of the thigh pain.
  • Prior laminectomy surgical procedure at lumber spine.
  • Patients who are willing to participate.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior femur and back related fracture,
  • Bilateral lower limb pain,
  • Any systemic issue.
  • Visual hamstring swelling.
  • Individual with cervical ligaments instability and migraine.
  • Unable to understand the consent form,
  • Patients who are not willing to participate in procedure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: conventional therapy
stretching of hamstring muscle, METs, sciatic nerve glides, lower limb neurodynamic.
stretching of hamstring muscle, METs, sciatic nerve glides, lower limb neurodynamics.
Experimental: Sub-occipital muscle inhibition technique
Therapist puts finger pads just beneath the superior nuchal line (below the occiput and above the C2 vertebra), and lifts the patient head slightly and apply an anterior force with cephalic traction on cervical spine this area. Then straighten the fingers to press the finger tips into muscle and hold until relaxation(30 sec) and then drop the head into palm in new position, give this technique in 10 rep/2 sets (each set have 5 repetitions).hot packs for 15 minutes prior to session, cervical muscle stretching,cervical mechanical traction for 8-10 minutes, force is applied 1/6th of the patient body weight, for C1-C2 at 0 degree of cervical flexion and for below C2 at 20 degree of cervical spine flexion. and cervical muscle Muscle Energy Techniques.
Therapist puts finger pads just beneath the superior nuchal line (below the occiput and above the C2 vertebra), and lifts the patient head slightly and apply an anterior force with cephalic traction on cervical spine this area. Then straighten the fingers to press the finger tips into muscle and hold until relaxation(30 sec) and then drop the head into palm in new position, give this technique in 10 rep/2 sets (each set have 5 repetitions).hot packs for 15 minutes prior to session, cervical muscle stretching,cervical mechanical traction for 8-10 minutes, force is applied 1/6th of the patient body weight, for C1-C2 at 0 degree of cervical flexion and for below C2 at 20 degree of cervical spine flexion and cervical muscle METs

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Active knee extension test
Time Frame: two weeks
Patient is supine, unaffected limb on support surface and the examined limb elevated so that hip in 90 degree of flexion and knee to extended position perpendicular to ground. A lag of 20 degrees is considered normal from full extension, less than 20 degrees is considered as hamstring muscle tightness
two weeks
Numeric pain rating scale
Time Frame: two weeks
The NPRS is a self-reported, or clinician administered, measurement tool consisting of a numerical point scale with extreme anchors of 'no pain' to 'extreme pain'. The scale is typically set up on a horizontal or vertical line, ranges most commonly from 0-10 or 0-100, and can be administered in written or verbal form.
two weeks
Modified Oswestry disability index
Time Frame: two weeks
The Oswestry Disability Index (aka the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire) is an extremely important tool that researchers and disability evaluators use to measure a patient's permanent functional disability. There are 10 questions, for each question there is a possible 5 points; 0 for the first answer, 1 for the second answer, etc.
two weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Maria khalid, MSOMPT, Riphah International University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 2, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

January 10, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 2, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

September 5, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • REC 01935 Safia Gul

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hamstring Tightness

Clinical Trials on Sub-occipital muscle inhibition technique

Subscribe