Using Anonymous Data From A Digital Tool for Medical History-Taking To Improve Healthcare Services

April 30, 2026 updated by: Frank Müller, MD, PhD, MSc, University Hospital Goettingen

Observation Of The Use Of Digital Tools for Medical History-Taking in Primary Care and Utilization of Anonymous Routine Data for Health Services Research

This study aims to understand how people use a mobile app that helps them record their symptoms before going to the doctor. Patients use the app on a tablet or other digital device. The app guides patients through a series of structured questions tailored to their symptoms. The data collected is then transferred to the practice's electronic record and is available to the treating doctor before and during the consultation.

In this project, anonymized usage data will be analyzed to contribute to the further development of the tool and to provide valuable insights for health services research.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

In several studies the usability of digital medical history tools has been demonstrated. These tools allow acute complaints to be recorded using an app before a medical consultation and the data collected to be transferred to the electronic medical record.

The aim of the study is to investigate the effectiveness and use of a digital medical history tool that is becoming increasingly popular in general practice. To this end, it is aimed to evaluate anonymized usage data provided by the company that distributes the app, aidminutes gUG, as part of an observational study with the aim of identifying potential for further development and for questions of health services research (e.g. on the frequency of GP consultations, morbidity and frequency of complaints). This is a retrospective data analysis of anonymous routine data in a cross-sectional design.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Lower Saxony, Germany

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • all patients that use the app in a general practice that agreed to provide data
  • all ages (including children if the app is used by parent or legal guardian)
  • all complaints chosen in the app

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients that use the app in a general practice that did not agree to provide data
  • patients that use the app in a general practice outside of the federal state Lower Saxony

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Patients
Patients who have used the digital medical history tool in one of the participating general practices

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Use patterns
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of app use, up to 8 years
Evaluation of the use patterns and frequencies of the medical history tool
From enrollment to the end of app use, up to 8 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Data quality
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of app use, up to 8 years
Investigation of the consistency and completeness of the medical history data collected by the medical history tool
From enrollment to the end of app use, up to 8 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2032

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2033

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 5, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 7, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Needs to be discussed with responsible data officer

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe