Comparison of Echo-assisted ALR Technique and Traditional ALR Technique for the Placement of an Epidural Catheter in the Obstetric Patient (OST-22-01)

Comparison of Echo-assisted ALR (Loco-regional Anesthesia) Technique and Traditional ALR Technique for the Placement of an Epidural Catheter in the Obstetric Patient Performed by an Anesthesia Resident

This is a randomized, open-label, single-center clinical trial. The purpose of the study is to understand whether the aid of ultrasound assessment is useful in improving the competence of resident.

Specifically, to demonstrate how the aid of echo-assistance in the evaluation of the spine increases the atraumatic success rate (primary objective) and reduces the number of complications (particularly, the number of attempts needed and the rate of dura puncture) (secondary objective) in physicians in specialty training.

Pregnant patients requiring peridural analgesia will be assigned to the intervention or control group by simple randomization.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

The use of echo-assisted assessment has been studied for about a decade, showing encouraging results as far as experienced medical personnel are concerned, but to date, a systematic study assessing the usefulness of this aid in improving residents' competence (as indicated by the 2019 systematic review) is lacking in the literature.

To date, echo-assisted assessment is not routinely applied to all obstetric patients, as it is a relatively new technique and not yet widely used by all anesthesiologists.

If the results of the study are positive,echo-assisted assessment use could be expanded, reducing the number of complications and increasing the number of atraumatic epidural catheter placements.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

146

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Aurora Guglielmetti, MD

Study Locations

      • Bologna, Italy, 40138
        • Recruiting
        • IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant patients >18 years of age with no BMI (Body Mass Index) limitation
  • Pregnant patients requiring partoanalgesia
  • Obtaining informed consent for study participation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with contraindications to epidural catheter placement
  • Endocranial hypertension
  • Coagulopathies
  • Severe thrombocytopenia < 75,000 per mm^3.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: echo-assisted ALR (loco-regional anesthesia) technique
Ultrasound evaluation of the spine as an aid in facilitating the placement of an epidural catheter

Experimental treatment consists of ultrasound assessment combined with palpatory assessment to identify the most suitable space for epidural catheter insertion.

The conventional neuroaxial technique relies on palpation of the spinous processes and iliac crests to recognize the midline and height of the lumbar interspace to be used to perform a neuroaxial block.

With the echo-assisted technique, in aid of the conventional technique, a preprocedure (Prepuncture) is performed for the purpose of combining classic anatomical findings with useful sonographic findings that should improve the success of the neuroaxial technique.

No Intervention: traditional ALR technique
The traditional neuroaxial technique involves palpation of the spinous processes and iliac crests to recognize the median and height of the lumbar interspace to be used to perform a neuroaxial block

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the rate of FNP (thus atraumatic puncture)
Time Frame: Through study completion,an average of 1 year

The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate whether or not the aid of echo-assistance in spinal evaluation, performed by an experienced anesthesiologist, increases the atraumatic success rate, First Needle Pass (FNP), in epidural catheter placement by inexperienced personnel (physicians in specialty training, MFS).

This objective will be calculated by observing the rate of FNP (thus atraumatic puncture).

Through study completion,an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change the number of complications
Time Frame: Through study completion,an average of 1 year

The secondary objective is to demonstrate whether the aid of echo-assistance in the evaluation of the spine, performed by an experienced anesthesiologist, reduces the number of complications (particularly the number of attempts needed and the rate of dura puncture, (accidental dural puncture, ADP) in epidural catheter placement by inexperienced personnel (physicians in specialty training).

The following outcomes will be considered to assess this objective:

  • number of traumatic punctures defined as: presence of redirects or number of punctures greater than one
  • median number of multiple punctures
  • number of women with failure (defined as number of punctures > 3)
  • number of accidental dural punctures (detected as CSF leaks).
Through study completion,an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Aurora Guglielmetti, MD, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 17, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 27, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • OST-22-01

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pregnancy

Clinical Trials on Ultrasound guided injection with local anaestethic

Subscribe