The Effect of Hydrodissection for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

July 31, 2018 updated by: Yung-Tsan Wu, Tri-Service General Hospital

The Effect of Hydrodissection for Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral entrapment neuropathy with involving compression of the median nerve in the carpal tunnel. Rather than other progressive disease, CTS is characterized by remission and recurrence. The hydrodissection could decrease the entrapment of nerve to restore blood supply. Despite the hydrodissection was pervasively used in clinical practice, current researches contain small participant without control group or randomized leading to foreseeable selection bias. The investigators design a randomized, double-blind, controlled trail to assess the effect after ultrasound-guided hydrodissection in patients with CTS.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

After obtaining written informed consent, patients with bilateral CTS will been randomized into intervention and control group. Participants in intervention group received one-dose ultrasound-guided hydrodissection and control side received one-dose ultrasound-guided injection at subcutaneous layer beyond carpal tunnel. No additional treatment after injection through the study period. The primary outcome is visual analog scale (VAS) and secondary outcomes include Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ), cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve, sensory nerve conduction velocity of the median nerve, and finger pinch strength. The evaluation was performed pretreatment as well as on the 2nd week, 1st, 2nd and 3rd month after the treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

34

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Neihu District
      • Taipei, Neihu District, Taiwan, 886
        • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Tri-Service General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 20-80 year-old.
  • Diagnosis was confirmed using an electrophysiological study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cancer
  • Coagulopathy
  • Pregnancy
  • Inflammation status
  • Cervical radiculopathy
  • Polyneuropathy, brachial plexopathy
  • Thoracic outlet syndrome
  • Previously undergone wrist surgery or steroid injection for CTS

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Normal saline hydrodissection
Ultrasound-guided hydrodissection with normal saline between carpal tunnel and median nerve.
Ultrasound-guided hydrodissection with 5cc normal saline between carpal tunnel and median nerve.
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Normal saline
Ultrasound-guided injection with normal saline at subcutaneous layer beyond the carpal tunnel region
Ultrasound-guided injection with 5cc normal saline at subcutaneous layer beyond carpal tunnel

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline of severity of symptoms and functional status on 2nd week, 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 6th month after injection
Time Frame: Pre-treatment, 2nd week, 1st, 2nd and 3rd month after injection
Boston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire (BCTQ) is a frequently used patient-based questionnaire for measurement of CTS which encompasses two components. In total, 11 questions and 8 items were evaluated to rate the symptom severity scale (SSS) and functional status scale (FSS), respectively. Both subscales range from 1 to 5 with a higher score indicating a higher degree of disability. The mean of total SSS and FSS divided with each item score were used for further analysis.
Pre-treatment, 2nd week, 1st, 2nd and 3rd month after injection

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline of pain on 2nd week, 1st, 2nd and 3rd month after injection
Time Frame: Pre-treatment, 2nd week, 1st, 2nd , 3rd and 6th month after injection
Digital pain severity or paresthesia/dysthesia was evaluated using visual analog scale (VAS). Pain score scale ranged from 0 to 10, with 10 indicating the most severe pain.
Pre-treatment, 2nd week, 1st, 2nd , 3rd and 6th month after injection
Change from baseline of cross-sectional area of the median nerve on 2nd week, 1st, 2nd and 3rd month after injection
Time Frame: Pre-treatment, 2nd week, 1st, 2nd , 3rd and 6th month after injection
Using the musculoskeletal sonogram to measure the cross-sectional area of the median nerve before treatment and multiple time frame after treatment.
Pre-treatment, 2nd week, 1st, 2nd , 3rd and 6th month after injection
Change from baseline of conduction velocity, amplitude of median nerve on 2nd week, 1st, 2nd and 3rd month after injection
Time Frame: Pre-treatment, 2nd week, 1st, 2nd , 3rd and 6th month after injection
Antidromic sensory nerve conduction velocity of the median nerve before treatment and multiple time frame after treatment.
Pre-treatment, 2nd week, 1st, 2nd , 3rd and 6th month after injection
Change from baseline of finger pinch on 2nd week, 1st, 2nd and 3rd month after injection
Time Frame: Pre-treatment, 2nd week, 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 6th month after injection
The finger pinch strength was measured using dynamometer (Fabrication Enterprises Inc., USA). The subject was seated with shoulder adducted and neutrally rotated with the elbow flexed at 90°. The forearm and wrist were positioned in a neutral position for the palmar pinch
Pre-treatment, 2nd week, 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 6th month after injection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

April 15, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 15, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 9, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 13, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 2, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 31, 2018

Last Verified

July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Ultrasound

3
Subscribe