- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06827132
Observational Study Evaluate Pathology Practice Use Artificial Intelligence in Patient Suspected Lung and Breast Cancer (CASCADE)
A Non-interventional Study Evaluating Samples From Patients With Suspected Non-small Lung Cancer or Breast Cancer to Describe Pathology Practices and to Evaluate Computational Pathology Plus Artificial Intelligence Algorithms.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
A non-interventional study evaluating samples from patients with suspected non-small lung cancer or breast cancer to describe pathology practices and to evaluate computational pathology plus artificial intelligence algorithms in Australia, Brazil, Egypt, and Kenya. Use of digital and computational Artificial intelligence pathology in countries with low and high pathologist/population ratios is critical in developing a sustainable solution. The study has two parts, the first part will focus on breast cancer, and the second part will focus on lung cancer.
The laboratories have an active digital pathology setting and evaluate samples for cancer diagnosis. The centres of lung cancer part of the study will be selected at a later stage. The study will retrospectively evaluate samples from patients who have been preliminarily diagnosed with breast or lung cancer through clinical assessments and whose samples were evaluated only by using conventional workflow.
As part of the study, computational AI pathology algorithms will be implemented in each laboratory. Two AI pathology algorithms will be used in the breast cancer part of the study. Galen™ Breast application developed by Ibex Medical Analytics will be implemented in a laboratory in Australia. MindPeak Breast, developed by MindPeak GmbH will be implemented in laboratories in Brazil, Egypt, and Kenya. After implementing computational AI pathology algorithms, 150 samples evaluated for the primary objective from each laboratory for each cancer type will be evaluated using a conventional workflow plus an AI assisted workflow with human supervision and a conventional workflow plus an AI-assisted workflow without human supervision. These evaluations will be used to analyse secondary and exploratory objectives.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Data from samples that meet the following inclusion criterion will be analyzed.
• Sample from adult patients (≥ 18 years) with suspected non-small cell lung cancer or invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:Sample from adult patients (≥ 18 years) with suspected non-small cell lung cancer or invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ.
-
Exclusion Criteria:
Samples with the inadequate technical quality of slides (pre-analytics quality) or images, e.g., broken slides, large out-of-focus areas, slides with fixation artefacts.
- Samples from cases that were included in the training or technical validation.
- Sample taken by fine needle aspiration.
- Sample sent for cytological evaluation.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
primary objective
Time Frame: 2 years
|
The duration between the biopsy-taken date/time and the biopsy-based pathological diagnosis date/time will be calculated based on the laboratory records retrospectively.
|
2 years
|
|
Primary Objective
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Reading time to assess section slides for pathological diagnosis will also be extracted from the laboratory records, if relevant information was kept in the records.
|
2 years
|
|
exploratory objective
Time Frame: 2 years
|
the total cost and fees related to training, for implementing digital pathology and computational AI pathology algorithms will be assessed as an endpoint.
|
2 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
secondary objectives
Time Frame: 2 years
|
agreement rate :PPV and NPV for computational AI pathology algorithms (with and without human supervision) when the conventional pathology workflow is the reference will also be evaluated.
|
2 years
|
|
exploratory objective
Time Frame: 2 years
|
the total cost and fees related to employees for implementing digital pathology and computational AI pathology algorithms will be assessed as an endpoint.
|
2 years
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Secondary Objective
Time Frame: 2 years
|
sensitivity:PPV and NPV for computational AI pathology algorithms (with and without human supervision) when the conventional pathology workflow is the reference will also be evaluated.
|
2 years
|
|
Secondary Objective
Time Frame: 2 years
|
specificity: PPV and NPV for computational AI pathology algorithms (with and without human supervision) when the conventional pathology workflow is the reference will also be evaluated.
|
2 years
|
|
exploratory objective
Time Frame: 2 years
|
The total cost and fees related to hardware for implementing digital pathology and computational AI pathology algorithms will be assessed as an endpoint.
|
2 years
|
|
Exploratory objective
Time Frame: 2 years
|
the total cost and fees related to software for implementing digital pathology and computational AI pathology algorithms will be assessed as an endpoint.
|
2 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- D4191R00089
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
When a request has been approved AstraZeneca will provide access to the anonymized individual patient-level data via secure research environment Vivli.org.
Signed Data Usage Agreement (non-negotiable contract for data accessors) must be in place before accessing requested information.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.