Efficacy of Orthodontic Tooth Movement Using Beveled and Conventional Attachments in Aligners

March 12, 2025 updated by: Neodent

Efficacy of Orthodontic Tooth Movement Using Beveled and Conventional Attachments in Aligners: a Randomized Split-Mouth Clinical Trial

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of tooth movement using beveled attachments and conventional attachments. The sample will be consecutively selected, comprising participants seeking orthodontic treatment in a private dental office within the recruitment period (from ethics committee approval to July 2027). Participants will be selected and randomized using a split-mouth study design. Groups will be divided into rectangular and beveled attachments, each further subdivided into subgroups for horizontal movements (Group H), vertical movements (Group V), and rotations (Group R), with 20 teeth/attachments per group, totaling a sample of 120 teeth/attachments. Digital study models will be obtained before the start of treatment and immediately after its completion. Additionally, clinical intraoral and extraoral photographs will be taken (pre- and post-treatment). Measurements will be collected from the initial and final digital models to determine the magnitude and direction of movements resulting from treatment. Descriptive statistics will be calculated for each type of dental movement evaluated. Paired tests will be conducted due to the split-mouth design. Correlation tests will be applied if necessary.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Participant recruitment will take place after approval by the Research Ethics Committee until July 2027. The consultations will occur in a private clinic in Curitiba - PR, Brazil.

Participants will be selected and randomized according to the split-mouth study design. Teeth on each side will have different attachment configurations to aid orthodontic aligner movements. One side will use rectangular attachments, and the other side will use beveled attachments. Groups will be divided as follows:

Group H: 20 teeth/attachments with horizontal displacements (parallel to the occlusal plane) including tipping or mesio-distal translation - premolars and molars.

Group V: 20 teeth/attachments with vertical displacements (extrusion and intrusion) - incisors.

Group R: 20 teeth/attachments with mesio-distal rotations - canines and premolars.

Digital study models (intraoral scanner) will be obtained before and after treatment. These intraoral scans will be analyzed alongside the planned movement models generated by the orthodontic treatment planning software.

Treatment efficacy will be analyzed using tooth-tracking methodology in Geomagic Control X, measuring the differences between planned and achieved movements and calculating the percentage of achieved orthodontic tooth movement.

Additionally, pre- and post-treatment clinical photographs will be taken:

Intraoral:

Frontal in occlusion; Right and left lateral views in occlusion; Occlusal views of upper and lower arches.

Extraoral:

Frontal with lips at rest; Frontal with a wide smile; Profile with lips at rest. All participants will receive orthodontic aligner treatment supervised by a qualified professional capable of providing relevant care under clinical trial conditions. Diagnosis, movement planning, and therapy monitoring procedures (e.g., aligner replacement frequency) for each individual will be established by the researcher, respecting the manufacturer's specified instructions.

The sample size was 30 participants will be recruited, totaling a sample of 120 teeth/attachments.

Participant satisfaction will be recorded pre-treatment, during follow-up, and post-treatment. In this study, oral health-related quality of life will be assessed through the OHIP-14 (Oral Health Impact Profile-14) questionnaire as a measure of participant satisfaction with the treatment.

Initial and final digital models will be imported using software, where measurements will be taken to identify the magnitude and direction of movements resulting from treatment with different attachment types:

Horizontal displacements (parallel to the occlusal plane) including tipping or mesio-distal translation - premolars and molars.

Vertical displacements (extrusion and intrusion) - incisors. Mesio-distal rotations - canines and premolars.

Descriptive statistics will be calculated for each type of tooth movement evaluated and described by mean, standard deviation, median, quartiles, minimum, and maximum. Paired tests will be conducted due to the split-mouth design. Correlation tests will also be applied if necessary.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

51

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Paraná
      • Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil, 81270-200
        • Private orthodontic clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults (18+ years) with permanent dentition
  • Candidates for aligner-based orthodontic treatment
  • Require bilateral tooth movements (e.g., extrusion, intrusion, rotation, tipping, mesiodistal translation)
  • Provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications to aligner use (e.g., manufacturer's guidelines)
  • Poor oral hygiene, active periodontal disease, or TMJ disorders
  • Allergies to aligner materials (e.g., polyurethane, PETG)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm: Beveled attachments
The patients will receive beveled attachments on one side of the jaws
Beveled attachments applied to 20 teeth in each subgroup (horizontal, vertical, and rotational movements).
Active Comparator: Rectangular Attachments
The patients will receive rectangular attachments on one side of the jaws
Conventional rectangular attachments applied to 20 teeth in each subgroup (horizontal, vertical, and rotational movements).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To evaluate the efficacy of dental movement using beveled and conventional attachments
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment, not exceeding 24 months.
Difference between the planned movement and the achieved movement, and the percentage of orthodontic dental movement achieved.
From enrollment to the end of treatment, not exceeding 24 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To measure dental movements achieved with the treatment.
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment, not exceeding 24 months.
To measure the horizontal, vertical, and rotational dental movements achieved with the treatment
From enrollment to the end of treatment, not exceeding 24 months.
Measure the transverse dental changes achieved.
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment, not exceeding 24 months.
Transverse dental changes will be analyzed by comparing pre-treatment and post-treatment digital dental scans.
From enrollment to the end of treatment, not exceeding 24 months.
To assess participant satisfaction throughout the treatment.
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment, not exceeding 24 months.
Participant satisfaction will be recorded pre-treatment, during follow-up, and post-treatment. In this study, oral health-related quality of life will be assessed through the OHIP-14 (Oral Health Impact Profile-14) questionnaire as a measure of participant satisfaction with the treatment.
From enrollment to the end of treatment, not exceeding 24 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 25, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 7, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CC.2024.Attachments

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe