- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06876415
Free for Weaning ECMO vs Respiratory Driven Study (FORWARD)
Monitoring of Occlusion Pressure and Esophageal Pressure to Guide Weaning From Venovenous ECMO in ARDS: a Randomized Controlled Study
In its most severe form, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) may require the use of veno-venous ECMO (vvECMO). While the criteria for vvECMO indication, ECMO settings, and ventilator management are relatively well-defined after the publication of the EOLIA trial and subsequent national or international guidelines, few studies have assessed the criteria and methods for weaning from vvECMO. Besides, advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology of mechanical ventilation (MV) weaning process have led to the development of specific monitoring tools for this phase.
Schematically, respiratory drive can be evaluated via the ventilator by measuring the pressure generated during a 100-millisecond expiratory occlusion (P0.1) and respiratory efforts through the measurement of esophageal pressure variation (delta Poeso).
Recent retrospective studies conducted on COVID-19 ARDS patients supported by vvECMO suggest a longer duration of mechanical ventilation for patients whose weaning and decannulation process was "forced," i.e., performed under conditions of significant respiratory drive and effort. High values of P0.1 and delta Poeso were associated with prolonged MV duration. Self-inflicted lung injury (P-SILI) and elevated transpulmonary pressure related to these uncontrolled respiratory efforts likely explain the negative impact on MV duration.
Therefore, this randomized study proposes to assess these monitoring tools, which are regularly used in clinical practice, to guide vvECMO weaning and decannulation decisions.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Sami HRAIECH, M.D., Ph.D
- Phone Number: +33 04 91 96 58 35
- Email: sami.hraiech@ap-hm.fr
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Christophe GUERVILLY, M.D.
- Phone Number: +33 04 91 96 58 35
- Email: christophe.guervilly@ap-hm.fr
Study Locations
-
-
-
Lyon, France
- Recruiting
- Hospices Civiles de Lyon
-
Contact:
- Jean-Christophe RICHARD, M.D, Ph.D
- Email: j-christophe.richard@chu-lyon.fr
-
Marseille, France, 13005
- Recruiting
- Assistance - Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille
-
Contact:
- Christophe GUERVILLY, M.D.
- Phone Number: +33 04 91 96 58 35
- Email: christophe.guervilly@ap-hm.fr
-
Contact:
- Sami HRAIECH, M.D, Ph.D.
- Phone Number: +33 04 91 96 58 35
- Email: sami.hraiech@ap-hm.fr
-
Principal Investigator:
- Sami HRAIECH, M.D, Ph.D.
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Christophe GUERVILLY, M.D.
-
Nice, France
- Recruiting
- CHU de Nice
-
Contact:
- Denis DOYEN, M.D
- Email: doyen.d@chu-nice.fr
-
Paris, France
- Recruiting
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
-
Contact:
- Matthieu SCHMIDT, M.D, Ph.D
- Email: matthieu.schmidt@aphp.fr
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patients aged 18 years or older Patient whose trusted person has given consent for participation in the study
- Patient on veno-venous ECMO with weaning criteria, including:
- Resolution of the cause of ARDS
- Absence of hemodynamic instability, defined as norepinephrine dose ≤ 0.5 μg/kg/min for at least 3 hours
- Use of a ventilatory mode that allows spontaneous ventilation (VS-AI, BiPAP, or APRV)
- Maximum inspiratory pressure ≤ 28 cm H2O, with a maximum driving pressure ≤ 15 cm H2O, enabling tidal volumes between 4 and 8 ml/kg of predicted body weight (PBW)
- ECMO membrane sweep flow ≤ 2 L/min
- Patient protected by social security
Exclusion Criteria:
- Contraindication to the placement of an esophageal pressure balloon (e.g., esophageal varices, nasal trauma, uncontrolled coagulopathy, severe thrombocytopenia),
- Patient with treatment limitation at the time of inclusion,
- Patient in the time frame of exclusion from another research protocol at the time of consent signing,
- Vulnerable patients: minor, adult patient under guardianship or curatorship, patient deprived of liberty, pregnant or breastfeeding woman.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: ECMO-physio group
Patients undergo the ultimate vvECMO weaning test with minimal ECMO support (ECMO flow ≤ 3 L/min, fresh gas flow ≤ 1 L/min, FiO2 21%) and mechanical ventilation with partial support, allowing spontaneous ventilation.
P0.1 and delta Poeso values will be monitored and integrated into the decannulation decision
|
P0.1 and delta Poeso integration into the decanulation decision
|
|
No Intervention: ECMO-gazo group
Patients undergo the ultimate vvECMO weaning test with minimal ECMO support, similar to the experimental group.
P0.1 and delta Poeso values will be monitored in a blinded manner by an independent investigator and will not be integrated into the decannulation decision.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Duration of mechanical ventilation from ECMO decannulation to weaning from mechanical ventilation
Time Frame: 60 days after inclusion
|
The weaning from mechanical ventilation is defined as the absence of mechanical ventilation for 48 consecutive hours.
|
60 days after inclusion
|
|
P0.1 and delta Poeso measurements
Time Frame: From inclusion to 48h after decanulation
|
P0.1 and delta Poeso values will be monitored and tracked at inclusion and then every 8 hours until decannulation, and up to 48 hours after decannulation. In the experimental group, these values will be incorporated into the criteria guiding the decannulation decision. In the control group, these values will be monitored and recorded by an investigator who is not involved in the decannulation decision. These values will not be included in the criteria guiding the decannulation decision. |
From inclusion to 48h after decanulation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mortality rate in intensive care unit
Time Frame: 60 days after inclusion
|
60 days after inclusion
|
|
|
Mortality rate in hospital
Time Frame: 60 days after inclusion
|
60 days after inclusion
|
|
|
Intensive care unit stay duration from inclusion
Time Frame: 60 days after inclusion
|
60 days after inclusion
|
|
|
Hospital stay duration from inclusion
Time Frame: 60 days after inclusion
|
60 days after inclusion
|
|
|
Total number of days spent on ECMO from admission to intensive care unit discharge
Time Frame: 60 days after inclusion
|
60 days after inclusion
|
|
|
Total duration of mechanical ventilation
Time Frame: 60 days after inclusion
|
60 days after inclusion
|
|
|
Time between the start of mechanical ventilation and ECMO cannulation
Time Frame: 60 days after inclusion
|
60 days after inclusion
|
|
|
Number of ventilator-free days
Time Frame: 60 days after inclusion
|
60 days after inclusion
|
|
|
Number of patients decannulated and then re-initiated on vvECMO
Time Frame: 60 days after inclusion
|
60 days after inclusion
|
|
|
Number of patients requiring controlled ventilation for at least 24 hours after decannulation
Time Frame: 60 days after inclusion
|
60 days after inclusion
|
|
|
Number of days with continuous sedation with or without continuous paralysis after decannulation
Time Frame: 60 days after inclusion
|
60 days after inclusion
|
|
|
Incidence of barotrauma assessed by radiographs and clinical examination after decannulation
Time Frame: 60 days after inclusion
|
60 days after inclusion
|
|
|
Percentage of patients placed in prone positioning after decannulation
Time Frame: 60 days after inclusion
|
60 days after inclusion
|
|
|
Number of days on inhaled nitric oxide after decannulation
Time Frame: 60 days after inclusion
|
60 days after inclusion
|
|
|
Number of patients who received corticosteroid therapy
Time Frame: 60 days after inclusion
|
≥ 0.5 mg/kg of equivalent methylprednisolone
|
60 days after inclusion
|
|
Neuromyopathy on the day of decannulation
Time Frame: Day of decanulation
|
Neuromyopathy will be assessed using the Medical Research Council score.
Total score ranges from 0 (complete tetraplegia) to 60 (normal muscle strength).
|
Day of decanulation
|
|
Neuromyopathy on the day of weaning from mechanical ventilation
Time Frame: Day of weaning from mechanical ventilation
|
Neuromyopathy will be assessed using the Medical Research Council score.
Total score ranges from 0 (complete tetraplegia) to 60 (normal muscle strength).
|
Day of weaning from mechanical ventilation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: François Crémieux, assistance publique - hôpitaux de Marseille
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- RCAPHM23_0464
- ID-RCB (Other Identifier: 2025-A02583-46)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.