- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06903416
Non-Invasive Neuromodulation for Upper Extremity Function in Spinal Cord Injury: A Crossover Trial
Comparative Evaluation of Non-Invasive Neuromodulation Therapies to Restore Upper Extremity Function in Chronic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Project Aims
The key objective of this pilot is to explore the feasibility of a comparative trial between two non-invasive neuromodulatory approaches for restoration of upper extremity function after SCI, and to work towards the identification of participant cohorts most suited for each intervention (i.e. responders). This objective will be achieved through the following:
- Evaluation of clinical safety and effectiveness of each intervention, within participants, through safety monitoring and the use of standardized assessments of upper extremity strength, sensation and movement performance.
- Evaluation of clinically meaningful improvements through participant reported outcomes related to activities of daily living, QoL and global impressions of change.
- Neurophysiological assessments to assess the mechanisms of recovery following each interventional period, but also to aid in the identification of neurophysiological correlates of "responders" to each therapy.
In this randomized crossover study, participants will receive two months of non-invasive tSCS over the cervical spinal cord in combination with functional task practice (minimum of 12 sessions/month) preceded or followed by two months of PCMS and functional task practice, with a 4-week washout period between each intervention. With this design we will be able to examine the relative efficacy of each paradigm within a single participant and begin to identify neurophysiological and/or clinical characteristics that may help to guide the clinical identification of suitable participants for each intervention.
The minimum training dose for each interventional block is 12 sessions/month, for a total of 24 sessions of training during each treatment phase. Participants will be invited to complete up to 5 sessions per week if feasible. Participants will be required to complete a comparable number of intervention sessions (i.e., within 10%) in each of the two interventions to ensure that any effects are not attributed to differences in dosage. Each intervention session will include at least 60 minutes of upper extremity functional task practice (FTP). The FTP will be completed with typical rehabilitation activities (e.g., range of motion, strengthening activities, moving paperclips, clothespins, cups, etc.) as well as the ReJoyce rehabilitation workstation (Rehabtronics, Alberta), which incorporates computer games into the rehabilitation activities.
Transcutaneous Cervical Spinal Cord Stimulation (tSCS) Cervical transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation will be delivered following previously reported guidelines. Circular (1.25") electrodes will be placed over the cervical spinal cord between the C3 and C4 vertebral level, with rectangular return electrodes placed either over the clavicles or iliac crests. Biphasic stimulation will be delivered continuously at 30Hz, with a 1ms pulse width, and overlapping 10kHz carrier frequency (Gelenitis et al 2024; Moritz et al 2024). Stimulation will be delivered at a current intensity below motor threshold, that is below the intensity required to elicit a muscle twitch. Cervical tSCS will be delivered for at least 60 minutes during each training session, and FTP will occur during the active stimulation.
Paired Corticospinal Motoneuronal Stimulation (PCMS) Paired transcranial magnetic stimulation and nerve stimulation will be implemented following a previously-published protocol for individuals with SCI (Jo et al 2023). Two figure-eight coils will be used to deliver bilateral magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex and will be combined with synchronous electrical stimulation of the brachial plexus and ulnar nerves, bilaterally. The timing of stimuli will be determined to ensure that electrical volleys arrive at the corticospinal motoneuronal synapse at an appropriate interval to induce long term potentiation. During each session, 360 paired stimuli will be delivered at a frequency of 0.2 Hz. The stimulation paradigm should take approximately 30 minutes. Following this, participants will then complete 60 minutes of FTP.
Functional Task Practice (FTP) A typical rehabilitation program will be defined and delivered in consultation with physical and occupational therapists. The program will consist of functional tasks including repetitive activities of gross upper extremity movement, isolated finger movements, simple and complex pinch, and grasping activities. For each category, 4-10 activities with various difficulty levels will be identified. Each participant will perform at least 1-2 exercises within each category during each treatment session. Activities in each category will be chosen according to the participants' ability and adjusted based on the evolution of the ability to perform the functional task over time (graded training).
Assessment Measures
Assessments will occur at baseline then monthly for five months, corresponding to the beginning, midpoint and end of each treatment block. All participants will also have a three-month follow-up assessment to evaluate retention of any intervention effects (i.e. carryover neuroplasticity).
Outcomes Clinical measures will be completed by an occupational or physical therapist who is blinded to participants' group allocation. Assessments will include clinical measures of upper extremity strength, sensation and function including the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) and related subscores such as Upper Extremity Motor Score and Sensory Scores as well as the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength Sensation and Performance (GRASSP). Patient reported outcomes will evaluate self-reported ability to perform activities of daily living (SCIM-III), overall quality of life (WHO-QoL BREF) and participant global impressions of change (PGIC) at the beginning and end of each intervention block (Figure 1).
Neurophysiological assessments will include transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the upper limb motor cortex to assess the excitability of the corticospinal tract, as well as stimulation to cervical dorsal roots to evaluate changes in cervical spinal cord excitability from the evoked multisegmental motor responses (cMMRs). TMS of the cortex has been used extensively in humans to assess the integrity of the descending corticospinal tract (Di Lazzaro et al 2008). Participants will be seated in their wheelchair. Single pulse TMS will be delivered at increasing stimulation intensity, with three stimuli (5s apart) at each intensity, until a plateau in evoked responses is reached, or we reach 100% maximal stimulator output or participant tolerability. Surface EMG will be recorded from multiple upper extremity muscles, bilaterally.
In a single visit, cMMRs will be evoked transcutaneously using single stimuli (1ms monophasic pulse). Muscle responses will be collected from multiple upper extremity muscles as per above. Stimulation will be delivered at an intensity below motor threshold for all muscles and will then be increased progressively until a plateau in evoked responses across the multiple muscles is obtained, or until participant tolerance is reached. The intensity increments will be chosen to ensure at least 9 measurements along the linear portion of the recruitment curve. Participants will receive 3 stimuli at each intensity, and stimuli will be delivered 5s apart (D'Amico et al 2013). Maximal compound muscle action potentials (Mmax) will be obtained at completion of the session by supramaximal stimulation of the brachial plexus (0.2ms pulse width).
Data Analysis Neurophysiology Measures The area of the reflex responses and MEPs obtained from TMS will be normalized to the Mmax area corresponding to the same muscle. The areas (%Mmax) will be plotted against the stimulation intensity (as a % maximum stimulator output (%MSO) or % of motor threshold (xMT)) and fit with a 3-parameter sigmoid function (D'Amico et al 2020, Klimstra & Zehr 2008). The stimulation intensity required to elicit a response 50% of the maximum response (S50) and the maximum evoked responses (cMMRmax) will be calculated for each muscle by fitting the experimental data with a three-parameter sigmoid function (D'Amico et al 2013, Klimstra & Zehr 2008). These measures will then be compared between the two interventions (tSCS and PCMS) within each participant.
Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Scores on each patient-reported outcome measure and clinical assessment will follow the standard protocol for scoring each assessment. All scores will be compared between baselines, end of each intervention period, and 3-month follow-up.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Phase 2
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Jessica M D'Amico, PhD
- Phone Number: 7802039478
- Email: damico1@ualberta.ca
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Caitlin Hurd, PhD
- Email: caitlin.hurd@ahs.ca
Study Locations
-
-
Alberta
-
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T5G0B7
- Recruiting
- Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital
-
Contact:
- Jessica M D'Amico, PhD
- Phone Number: 7802039478
- Email: damico1@ualberta.ca
-
Contact:
- Caitlin Hurd, PhD
- Email: caitlin.hurd@ahs.ca
-
Principal Investigator:
- Jessica M D'Amico, PhD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Monica Gorassini, PhD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Cervical (C2-C8) level SCI
- > 9 months post-injury
- Traumatic SCI
- AIS A-D
- Stable dose of anti-spasmodics
Exclusion Criteria:
- individuals with injury to the nervous system other than to the spinal cord
- pregnant
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Basic Science
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Cervical Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation with Functional Task Practice
Cervical transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation will be delivered following previously reported guidelines.
Circular (1.25") electrodes will be placed over the cervical spinal cord between the C3 and C4 vertebral level, with rectangular return electrodes placed either over the clavicles or iliac crests.
Biphasic stimulation will be delivered continuously at 30Hz, with a 1ms pulse width, and overlapping 10kHz carrier frequency (Gelenitis et al 2024; Moritz et al 2024).
Stimulation will be delivered at a current intensity below motor threshold, that is below the intensity required to elicit a muscle twitch.
Cervical tSCS will be delivered for at least 60 minutes during each training session, and FTP will occur during the active stimulation.
|
Cervical transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation will be delivered following previously reported guidelines.
Circular (1.25") electrodes will be placed over the cervical spinal cord between the C3 and C4 vertebral level, with rectangular return electrodes placed either over the clavicles or iliac crests.
Biphasic stimulation will be delivered continuously at 30Hz, with a 1ms pulse width, and overlapping 10kHz carrier frequency (Gelenitis et al 2024; Moritz et al 2024).
Stimulation will be delivered at a current intensity below motor threshold, that is below the intensity required to elicit a muscle twitch.
Cervical tSCS will be delivered for at least 60 minutes during each training session, and FTP will occur during the active stimulation.
A typical rehabilitation program will be defined and delivered in consultation with physical and occupational therapists.
The program will consist of functional tasks including repetitive activities of gross upper extremity movement, isolated finger movements, simple and complex pinch, and grasping activities.
For each category, 4-10 activities with various difficulty levels will be identified.
Each participant will perform at least 1-2 exercises within each category during each treatment session.
Activities in each category will be chosen according to the participants' ability and adjusted based on the evolution of the ability to perform the functional task over time (graded training).
|
|
Active Comparator: Paired Corticospinal Motoneuronal Stimulation with Functional Task Practice
Paired transcranial magnetic stimulation and nerve stimulation will be implemented following a previously-published protocol for individuals with SCI (Jo et al 2023).
Two figure-eight coils will be used to deliver bilateral magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex and will be combined with synchronous electrical stimulation of the brachial plexus and ulnar nerves, bilaterally.
The timing of stimuli will be determined to ensure that electrical volleys arrive at the corticospinal motoneuronal synapse at an appropriate interval to induce long term potentiation.
During each session, 360 paired stimuli will be delivered at a frequency of 0.2 Hz.
The stimulation paradigm should take approximately 30 minutes.
Following this, participants will then complete 60 minutes of FTP.
|
A typical rehabilitation program will be defined and delivered in consultation with physical and occupational therapists.
The program will consist of functional tasks including repetitive activities of gross upper extremity movement, isolated finger movements, simple and complex pinch, and grasping activities.
For each category, 4-10 activities with various difficulty levels will be identified.
Each participant will perform at least 1-2 exercises within each category during each treatment session.
Activities in each category will be chosen according to the participants' ability and adjusted based on the evolution of the ability to perform the functional task over time (graded training).
Paired transcranial magnetic stimulation and nerve stimulation will be implemented following a previously-published protocol for individuals with SCI (Jo et al 2023).
Two figure-eight coils will be used to deliver bilateral magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex and will be combined with synchronous electrical stimulation of the brachial plexus and ulnar nerves, bilaterally.
The timing of stimuli will be determined to ensure that electrical volleys arrive at the corticospinal motoneuronal synapse at an appropriate interval to induce long term potentiation.
During each session, 360 paired stimuli will be delivered at a frequency of 0.2 Hz.
The stimulation paradigm should take approximately 30 minutes.
Following this, participants will then complete 60 minutes of FTP.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI)
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 months (end of block 1), 3 months (start of block 2), 5months (end of block 2) and 8 months (follow-up)
|
The ISNCSCI and its associated subscores related to upper extremity motor and sensory scores will be completed by a blinded assessor.
|
Baseline, 2 months (end of block 1), 3 months (start of block 2), 5months (end of block 2) and 8 months (follow-up)
|
|
Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength Sensation and Performance (GRASSP)
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 months (end of block 1), 3 months (start of block 2), 5months (end of block 2) and 8 months (follow-up)
|
The GRASSP will be assessed by a blinded assessor to evaluate changes in strength, sensation and performance of the upper extremities.
|
Baseline, 2 months (end of block 1), 3 months (start of block 2), 5months (end of block 2) and 8 months (follow-up)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Spinal excitability - Cervical Multisegmental Motor Responses (cMMR)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month (mid-block 1), 2 months (end of block 1), 3 months (start of block 2), 4 months (mid block 2), 5months (end of block 2) and 8 months (follow-up)
|
Electrical stimulation to cervical dorsal roots via electrodes placed over the midline of the spinal cord will be used to evaluate changes in cervical spinal cord excitability from the intervention.
Recruitment curves will be performed by progressively increasing the stimulation intensity until a plateau in evoked response or reached, or until participant tolerance is reached.
|
Baseline, 1 month (mid-block 1), 2 months (end of block 1), 3 months (start of block 2), 4 months (mid block 2), 5months (end of block 2) and 8 months (follow-up)
|
|
Corticospinal Excitability-Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month (mid-block 1), 2 months (end of block 1), 3 months (start of block 2), 4 months (mid block 2), 5months (end of block 2) and 8 months (follow-up)
|
TMS of the cortex has been used extensively in humans to assess the integrity of the descending corticospinal tract (Di Lazzaro et al 2008).
Participants will be seated in their wheelchair.
Single pulse TMS will be delivered at increasing stimulation intensity, with three stimuli (5s apart) at each intensity, until a plateau in evoked responses is reached, or we reach 100% maximal stimulator output or participant tolerability.
Surface EMG will be recorded from multiple upper extremity muscles, bilaterally.
|
Baseline, 1 month (mid-block 1), 2 months (end of block 1), 3 months (start of block 2), 4 months (mid block 2), 5months (end of block 2) and 8 months (follow-up)
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
SCIM III
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 months (end of block 1), 3 months (start of block 2), 5months (end of block 2) and 8 months (follow-up)
|
The SCIM III is a validated survey for people with SCI that assesses independence during activities of daily living such as self-care, respiration and sphincter management and mobility.
Participants will complete this survey themselves.
|
Baseline, 2 months (end of block 1), 3 months (start of block 2), 5months (end of block 2) and 8 months (follow-up)
|
|
WHOQoL-BREF
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 months (end of block 1), 3 months (start of block 2), 5months (end of block 2) and 8 months (follow-up)
|
The WHOQoL-BREF will be self-reported by participants to assess changes in the four domains: physical, psychological, social and environment.
|
Baseline, 2 months (end of block 1), 3 months (start of block 2), 5months (end of block 2) and 8 months (follow-up)
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score
Time Frame: Month 2 (end of block 1), and Month 5 (end of block 2)
|
Participant will self-report their impressions of change upon completion of each phase of the interventional crossover study.
|
Month 2 (end of block 1), and Month 5 (end of block 2)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jessica M D'Amico, PhD, University of Alberta
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Pro00149698
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injury Cervical
-
StemCells, Inc.TerminatedStudy of Human Central Nervous System (CNS) Stem Cell Transplantation in Cervical Spinal Cord InjuryCervical Spinal Cord Injury | Spine Injury | Cervical Spine InjuryUnited States, Canada
-
University Health Network, TorontoCanadian Training Platform for Trials Leveraging Existing NetworksRecruitingCervical Spinal Cord InjuryCanada
-
Jason CarmelNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)RecruitingSpinal Cord Injury | Spinal Cord Injury CervicalUnited States
-
Riphah International UniversityCompletedCervical Spinal Cord InjuryPakistan
-
MetroHealth Medical CenterNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS); Case Western...RecruitingSpinal Cord Injuries | Spinal Cord Injury at C5-C7 Level | Spinal Cord Injury CervicalUnited States
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...TerminatedSpinal Cord Injuries | Cervical Spinal Cord Injury | Traumatic Spinal Cord CompressionUnited States
-
Stanford UniversityUnited States Department of DefenseRecruitingCervical Spinal Cord Injury | Tetraplegia | Tetraplegia/Tetraparesis | Cervical Spinal Cord Paralysis | Tetraplegic Spinal ParalysisUnited States
-
Swiss Paraplegic Research, NottwilRecruitingCervical Spinal Cord InjurySwitzerland
-
The Methodist Hospital Research InstituteRecruitingSpinal Cord Injuries | Cervical Spinal Cord InjuryUnited States
-
Quality Living, Inc.Enrolling by invitationSpinal Cord Injury CervicalUnited States
Clinical Trials on Transcutaneous Cervical Spinal Cord Stimulation
-
Institut GuttmannCompleted
-
University of LouisvilleWithdrawnSpinal Cord InjuriesUnited States
-
James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical CenterRecruitingOrthostatic HypotensionUnited States
-
Roberto de FreitasChuck Noll FoundationTerminatedTBI (Traumatic Brain Injury) | Traumatic Brain InjuryUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoCongressionally Directed Medical Research ProgramsRecruitingAcute Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) | Acute Spinal Cord Injury of Traumatic Origin (tSCI)United States
-
University of British ColumbiaNot yet recruitingSpinal Cord Injuries and Disorders (SCI/D)Canada
-
Ruijin HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
University of British ColumbiaProvidence Health & Services; International Spinal Research Trust; International...RecruitingSexual Dysfunction, Physiological | Spinal Cord Injuries | Neurogenic Bowel | Neurogenic Bladder | Spinal Cord StimulationCanada
-
University of Mississippi Medical CenterMethodist Rehabilitation CenterRecruitingSpinal Cord Injuries | Spasticity, MuscleUnited States
-
NHS Greater Glasgow and ClydeUniversity of Glasgow; The Queen Elizabeth HospitalNot yet recruiting