Relevance of Osteochondral Lesions in Ankle Microinstability

April 28, 2025 updated by: RAUL FIGA BARRIOS

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if treating only the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) tear with ligament repair is as effective as treating both the ligament tear and the associated osteochondral lesion of the talus at the same time in adults with ankle instability and pain.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Do patients who undergo both ligament repair and treatment of the cartilage lesion have better clinical and functional outcomes than those who only have the ligament repaired?
  • Is there a difference in pain relief, recovery time, and return to physical activity between the two approaches?

Researchers will compare patients who receive isolated ligament repair to those who receive ligament repair plus microfracture surgery to see if treating both injuries provides better results.

Participants will:

  • Be randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups.
  • Undergo surgery by the same surgeon.
  • Complete questionnaires about ankle function and pain before surgery and at multiple follow-up points.
  • Have physical exams and imaging to assess ankle stability and healing.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This randomized controlled trial investigates the clinical relevance of concomitant osteochondral lesions of the talus in patients undergoing surgical treatment for chronic ankle instability (CAI). Despite successful ligament reconstruction, a substantial proportion of patients report persistent pain, possibly due to associated intra-articular pathology. The study aims to determine whether addressing the osteochondral lesion during the same surgical procedure provides additional clinical or functional benefit compared to isolated ligament repair.

Sixty adult patients with symptomatic CAI and a concomitant talar osteochondral lesion (≤150 mm², Berndt-Harty stage I-IIb) were randomly assigned to two parallel groups. Both groups underwent arthroscopic all-inside anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) repair. In the experimental group, additional curettage and microfracture of the osteochondral lesion were performed. A standardized rehabilitation protocol was followed, with return to sport permitted at three months for the isolated repair group, and four months for the combined intervention group due to the more extensive surgical gesture.

Primary and secondary outcomes were assessed using validated scales (AOFAS, Karlsson, SEFAS, and VAS) at baseline, and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. The minimum follow-up period was two years. Statistical analysis included mixed ANOVA for repeated measures and adjustment for multiple comparisons. The study was powered to detect clinically significant differences in AOFAS scores between groups, with a sample size of 30 per group allowing for 20% attrition.

This study addresses a current gap in the literature regarding the management of osteochondral lesions in CAI and provides level I evidence to guide treatment decisions in patients with combined ligamentous and chondral pathology.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

71

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Terrassa, Spain, 08227
        • Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with an anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) tear
  • Presence of an osteochondral lesion (OCL) <150 mm²
  • OCL classified as stage I-IIb according to the Berndt & Harty classification
  • Clinical signs of ankle instability
  • Pain in the tibiotalar joint
  • Incomplete symptom resolution after prior non-surgical treatment
  • Age over 18 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Congenital or post-traumatic bone deformity of the ankle or foot on the affected side
  • Previous surgery on the affected limb
  • Neuromuscular disorders
  • Generalized joint hyperlaxity (Beighton Score)
  • Medial ankle instability (due to deltoid ligament injury)
  • Presence of OCL >150 mm²
  • Presence of multiple OCLs or other concomitant intra- or extra-articular lesions
  • History of ankle fracture
  • Lack of signed informed consent
  • Body mass index >30 Age under 18 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: REC (Reconstruction Only) Group
This group underwent only the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) repair using the all-inside arthroscopic technique.
This intervention involves an isolated all-inside arthroscopic repair of the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) without addressing the coexisting osteochondral lesion of the talus. It is intended for patients with chronic ankle instability and a concomitant talar osteochondral lesion, where only the ligamentous injury is treated. Patients follow a standard rehabilitation protocol with return to sports allowed after 3 months.
Experimental: REC+MIC (Reconstruction with Microfracture) Group
This group underwent both the ATFL repair and the additional procedure of curettage and microfracture for the osteochondral lesion of the talus via arthroscopy.
This intervention involves an isolated all-inside arthroscopic repair of the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) without addressing the coexisting osteochondral lesion of the talus. It is intended for patients with chronic ankle instability and a concomitant talar osteochondral lesion, where only the ligamentous injury is treated. Patients follow a standard rehabilitation protocol with return to sports allowed after 3 months.
This intervention consists of an arthroscopic debridement and microfracture of a symptomatic osteochondral lesion of the talus. Postoperative rehabilitation is extended due to the cartilage procedure, delaying return to sports until 4 months.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in AOFAS (American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society) score
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperative
Evaluation of functional outcome using the AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Scale, which combines pain, function, and alignment. The AOFAS score ranges from 0 (severe disability) to 100 (normal function).
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Surgical failure and reintervention rate
Time Frame: Any time during the 24-month follow-up period
Number of participants requiring additional surgical procedures on the same ankle due to persistent symptoms or complications related to the initial intervention.
Any time during the 24-month follow-up period
Change in Karlsson score
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperative
Assessment of ankle instability and function using the Karlsson scoring scale. The Karlsson score ranges from 0 (severe instability and dysfunction) to 100 (normal ankle function).
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperative
Change in SEFAS (Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperative
Patient-reported questionnaire evaluating pain and function in the foot and ankle. The SEFAS score ranges from 0 (severe disability) to 48 (normal function).
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperative
Change in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperative
Patient-reported level of pain using a 10-point visual scale. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).
Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: RAÚL FIGA BARRIOS, Consultant in the Foot and Ankle Unit of the Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 5, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 16, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 16, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 21, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 27, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 01-20-105-055
  • MED-2022-05 (Other Identifier: Universitat Internacional de Catalunya)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results reported in this article will be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author, for purposes of academic and non-commercial research. Requesters will need to provide a methodologically sound proposal and agree to a data access agreement to ensure confidentiality and appropriate use.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available beginning 6 months after publication of the primary results and will remain available for a period of 5 years.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

De-identified individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results reported in this article will be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author, for purposes of academic and non-commercial research. Requesters will need to provide a methodologically sound proposal and agree to a data access agreement to ensure confidentiality and appropriate use.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe