Assessing Impact of Myofascial Release Versus Dry Needling for Chondromalacia in Adult Females (females)

May 17, 2025 updated by: Doaa Saeed Mohamed, Badr University

Assessing Impact of Myofascial Release Versus Dry Needling for Chondromalacia in Adult Females: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Assessing Impact of Myofascial Release versus Dry Needling for Chondromalacia in Adult females. The study employed a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) design.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A total of 45 female patients diagnosed with chondromalacia and confirmed by physical examination using a patellar grind test to confirm Clarke's sign were recruited for this study from the out patient clinic and Soad Kafafi's educational hospital , Investigations that analyzed the H/Q ratio by the use of gravity corrected isokinetic strength testing.

Inclusion criteria were:

  • Age between 18-50 years old, the anterior knee pain recorded while one of the following activities at least :ascending and descending stairs, prolonged sitting and kneeling.
  • Subject experiences pain during palpation of patellar facets or while performing a 25-cm step down test or double legged squat.
  • Exclusion criteria included meniscal or intra-articular pathological conditions, cruciate or collateral ligaments involvement, tenderness over the patellar tendon .
  • These participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups, each consisting of 15 patients all received treatment for 3 weeks, 2 sessions per weak.

Group 1: Received dry needling combined with traditional treatment( straight leg raising and isometric quadriceps exercises) for 3 weeks, 2 sessions per weak.

Group 2: Received myofascial release in addition to traditional treatment for 3 weeks, 2 sessions per week. Evaluation of fascial restriction was assessed using the therapists elbow.

Myofascial chain release:

Position of the patient: Supine lying, prone lying and side lying Position of the therapist: Side of the patient limb to be treated

-Technique: Using the therapist elbow a vertical release proximal to the attachment of the muscle belly or fascia was applied. Once an end-feel was reached a slow stroke down the length of the target tissue was performed along with monitoring the indirect feedback and tissue tension to identify any additional restrictions. The long stroke was repeated in a line parallel to the first stroke. It was continued until an end-feel is reached throughout the entire muscle belly or fascia on the most restricted/ painful points.

Traditional Treatment ( exercise) : Applied uniformly across all groups, comprising straight leg raising and isometric quadriceps exercises (2 days per week).

Group 3: Received only the traditional treatment only for 3 weeks, 2 sessions per weak.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

45

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Masr university for sceince and technology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 18-50 years old, the anterior knee pain recorded while one of the following activities at least :ascending and descending stairs, prolonged sitting and kneeling.
  • Subject experiences pain during palpation of patellar facets or while performing a 25-cm step down test or double legged squat. (Iiona, 2020)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • excluded meniscal or intra-articular pathological conditions, cruciate or collateral ligaments involvement, tenderness over the patellar tendon .
  • These participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups, each consisting of 15 patients all received treatment for 3 weaks, 2 sessions per weak.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: group 1:adding dry needle to traditional exercises
Received dry needling combined with traditional treatment( straight leg raising and isometric quadriceps exercises) for 3 weeks, 2 sessions per weak.
dry needles Administered to patients in Group 1 as part of their treatment regimen( 2 days per week).
comprising straight leg raising and isometric quadriceps exercises (2 days per week).
Experimental: group 2: adding myofascial release to traditional exercises
Myofascial Release: Provided to patients in Group 2 along with traditional treatment( 2 days per week).Evaluation of fascial restriction was assessed using the therapists elbow. Any restrictions felt were assessed and given treatment.
comprising straight leg raising and isometric quadriceps exercises (2 days per week).

Myofascial Release: Provided to patients in Group 2 along with traditional treatment( 2 days per week).

Evaluation of fascial restriction was assessed using the therapists elbow. Any restrictions felt were assessed and given treatment.Myofascial chain release- Position of the patient- Supine lying, prone lying and side lying Position of the therapist- Side of the patient limb to be treated

- Technique-Using the therapist elbow a vertical release proximal to the attachment of the muscle belly or fascia was applied. Once an end-feel was reached a slow stroke down the length of the target tissue was performed along with monitoring the indirect feedback and tissue tension to identify any additional restrictions. The long stroke was repeated in a line parallel to the first stroke. It was continued until an end-feel is reached throughout the entire muscle belly or fascia on the most restricted/ painful points.

Active Comparator: group 3: (control group): Applied Traditional exercise
Traditional Treatment ( exercise) : Applied uniformly across all groups, comprising straight leg raising and isometric quadriceps exercises (2 days per week).
comprising straight leg raising and isometric quadriceps exercises (2 days per week).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The isokinetic muscle strength
Time Frame: 3 weeks
  • Peak Torque (PT): Measured using the isokinetic dynamometer system to assess the strength of the muscles.
  • AGO/ANT Ratio: Evaluated using the isokinetic dynamometer system to examine the balance between agonist and antagonist muscle groups.
3 weeks
pain intensity by visual analogue scale.
Time Frame: 3 Weeks
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS): Utilized to measure the intensity of pain experienced by the patients.
3 Weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Life physical and mental states
Time Frame: 3 Weeks
Quality of Life Scale Questionnaire (QLS): Administered to assess both the physical and mental status of the patients.
3 Weeks
Activity and functional levels of Lower Extremity
Time Frame: 3 weeks
Lower Extremity Scale Questionnaire (LES): Used to evaluate the activity levels and functionality of the patients' lower extremities.
3 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Doaa S Mohamed, lecturer, lecturer physical therapy for women health Badr University at Cairo

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

May 15, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 28, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

May 20, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

May 20, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chondromalacia

Clinical Trials on Dry Needling

3
Subscribe