Effect of Pulsed Signal Therapy in Patella Chondromalacia

April 23, 2017 updated by: Marco Kawamura Demange, University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

Effect of Pulsed Signal Therapy in Patella Chondromalacia. Randomized Prospective Trial.

PST (pulsed signal therapy) is a unique form of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMF) for stimulating healing of damaged structures such as cartilage, bones and soft tissues. The physical effect of the pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) has been focus of research in various studies, with cartilage being the most studied, and which has demonstrated an increase in the synthesis of proteoglican and collagen in vitro. This is an randomized, controlled and double blind clinical trial. The main objective is to evaluate clinical improvement regarding anterior knee pain after PST intervention in patients with patellar condropathy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Clinical Hospital (Hospital das Clinicas), University of São Paulo (Universidade de São Paulo - USP) under number 0253/11.

This patient population is estimated to a total of 40 knees, with the patients meeting the following inclusion criteria:

  • aged between 20 and 50 years;
  • male or female;
  • patellofemoral pain syndrome without tibiofemoral and trochlear chondral degeneration according to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI);
  • presence of patellar chondropathy confirmed by MRI;
  • not having started using direct action drugs on the cartilage in the last 6 months;
  • absence of prior surgery on the studied knee;
  • absence of invasive procedures, such as knee infiltration, in the previous 12 months;
  • absence of disease in the contralateral limb that would cause an excessive burden on the studied limb; and
  • absence of contraindications to performing PST, including a pacemaker, cancer, infectious disease activity, severe heart failure, arrhythmias, angina, epilepsy and pregnancy.

The presence of patellofemoral pain is identified by anamnesis and physical examination performed by knee surgeons with more than 10 years' experience. The presence of all of the following criteria is required for diagnosis: typical complaint of anterior knee pain with a duration longer than 3 months (when going up or down stairs, squatting, remaining for long periods with bent knees), pain on palpation of the patellar articular surface and pain on patellar compression (reproducing the patient's complaint).

After inclusion in the study, all of the patients will be instructed (for the duration of the study) not to use drugs with a direct action on the cartilage (e.g., chondroprotectors, such as glucosamine and chondroitin) to avoid confounding biases regarding the effects of the treatments. No patients will be included who had started using these drugs in the previous 6 months to avoid the initial effect of this treatment being a confounder in terms of clinical improvement.

The study is designed so that the patient and the orthopedist evaluating the clinical outcome do not know to which group the patient belongs (i.e., a double-blind study).

After patient inclusion and signing of the terms of free and informed consent, the patients will be randomized by a computer into 2 equal groups, i.e., the control and PST groups. The patients with both knees included in the study will receive randomization for the right knee, and the left will be automatically allocated into the other group. This method was selected to best demonstrate any differences between groups. The final distribution of patients into groups will be therefore not equalized.

PST application will be then directed to the patellofemoral joint. The PST application protocol is as follows: 9 daily 1-hour applications, with 5 in the first week, a break for the weekend, and 4 more the following week.

The control group patients will be submitted to placebo PST treatment with the same protocol and the device connected not generating magnetic pulses. The device operates silently, and it is not possible for the patient to determine whether they are receiving the placebo or treatment, thus maintaining patient blinding. For patients with both knees included, 9 sessions of the treatment are performed on one side and 9 more sessions of the placebo on the other.

All of the participants are instructed to maintain their usual level of physical activity.

The Kujala score will be taken after 3, 6 and 12 months in both groups. If superiority of the PST group is observed, it was decided for ethical reasons that the placebo group should receive the PST treatment and would again be followed up for 1-year post-treatment, with the Kujala score ascertained at 3, 6 and 12 months.

A sample of approximately 20 patients in each group was used for an alpha of 5% and beta of 20%. An effect size of 8 to 10 between groups was sought and is considered clinically significant in terms of Kujala score.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

41

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Sao Paulo, Brazil, 05403-010
        • Hospital das Clínicas - Universty of São Paulo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patellofemoral pain syndrome without tibiofemoral and trochlear chondral degeneration according to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI);
  • presence of patellar chondropathy confirmed by MRI;
  • not having started using direct action drugs on the cartilage in the last 6 months;
  • absence of prior surgery on the studied knee;
  • absence of invasive procedures, such as knee infiltration, in the previous 12 months;
  • absence of disease in the contralateral limb that would cause an excessive burden on the studied limb; and
  • absence of contraindications to performing PST, including a pacemaker, cancer, infectious disease activity, severe heart failure, arrhythmias, angina, epilepsy and pregnancy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: PST group
roughly 20 patients will be treated with PST protocol, outcomes will be Kujala score improvement at 3, 6 and 12 months.
PST application is a painless over-the-skin eletromagnetic field application. 9 sessions of application of electromagnetic therapy - PST - during 60 minutes
Other Names:
  • PEMF
  • PST
  • Pulsed Eletromagnetic Field
Placebo Comparator: Control group
roughly 20 patients will be submitted to a placebo PST protocol, outcomes will be Kujala score improvement at 3, 6 and 12 months.

Placebo PST will be performed by applying the same device over the patient knee. The machine is not applying the PST but it appears to be on. In this way, patients are blinded to the intervation.

9 sessions of application of Sham PST - during 60 minutes

Other Names:
  • Placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical improvement - Kujala score
Time Frame: 12 months
A functional score (Kujala) will be performed before, at 3 months, at 6 months and at one year after PST intervention and placebo.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Adriana Lucia P Silva, B.Sc., M.Sc., University of Sao Paulo
  • Principal Investigator: Riccardo G Gobbi, M.D., University of Sao Paulo
  • Study Chair: Gilberto L Camanho, M.D., Ph.D, University of Sao Paulo
  • Study Director: Marco K Demange, M.D., Ph.D, University of Sao Paulo

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 8, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

December 16, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2017

Last Verified

April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Patella Chondromalacia

Clinical Trials on PST - Pulsed Signal Therapy

3
Subscribe