Clinical Trial Comparing Pain Perception in Children Using Two Different Local Anesthesia Tools
Pain Experience in Pediatric Patients During Local Anesthesia Infiltration: A Split-Mouth Clinical Trial Comparing Super Pen And Traditional Syringe
The goal of this clinical study is to learn whether the Super Pen (SP) device can reduce pain during local anesthesia (LA) infiltration for primary teeth compared to the conventional syringe (CS) in children aged 6-12 years. It will also explore factors that influence children's pain perception and their preferences for the anesthesia delivery method.
The main questions this study aims to answer are:
- Does the Super Pen (SP) reduce the pain experienced during LA infiltration compared to the conventional syringe (CS)?
- How do factors such as age, sex, and arch treated (maxilla or mandible) influence children's pain perception when using the SP?
- Which method-SP or CS-do children prefer during LA infiltration?
Participants will:
Receive local anesthesia using both the SP and CS techniques in a split-mouth design.
Have their pain responses assessed using self-reported, behavioral, and physiological measures.
Indicate their preference for either technique after both experiences.
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This clinical study aims to evaluate and compare the pain perception of pediatric patients aged 6-12 years during local anesthetic (LA) infiltration for primary teeth using the Computer-Controlled Local Anesthetic Delivery (CCLAD) system-Super Pen (SP)-versus the Conventional Syringe (CS) technique. The study follows a split-mouth crossover design, in which each child receives anesthesia using both techniques in separate appointments, allowing for direct within-subject comparison.
Pain assessment will be conducted using a combination of self-reported, behavioral, and physiological measures: the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R), the revised Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (r-FLACC) behavioral pain scale, and heart rate monitoring. These multiple pain measures used provide a comprehensive evaluation of the child's pain experience.
The study will also investigate the influence of age, sex, and anatomical site (maxilla or mandible) on pain perception during SP administration. In addition, children's preferences for the two delivery systems (SP versus CS) will be recorded after both experiences to assess acceptance and comfort.
The findings of this research aim to contribute to improving pain management strategies in pediatric dentistry, supporting the use of more comfortable and child-friendly anesthesia delivery systems to enhance the dental experience and reduce anxiety in young patients.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Amman, Jordan
- Lamis
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Children who were 6-12 years of age, of both sexes.
- Children who were healthy and medically fit; ASA I .
- Children who had positive (Class 3) or definitely positive (Class 4) behavior during preoperative behavioral assessments according to the Frankl Scale at the enrollment visit.
- Children who require bilateral LA infiltration injections for primary teeth, either in the maxilla or mandible, for dental treatment (different types of restoration, stainless steel crowns, pulp therapy, and extractions).
- Children with positive consent forms approved by their parents/ legal guardians.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Children who have had a history of unpleasant experiences in medical settings and/or LA injection procedures.
- Children with any mental, visual, or auditory impairment.
- Children who have medical or developmentally compromising conditions.
- Children who had developmental delay problems.
- Children with a history of chronic disease or use of medication that contraindicate the use of local anesthetics.
- Children who had active pathosis at the injection site that could affect anesthetic assessment.
- Patients who have negative (Class 2) or definitely negative (Class 1) behavior during preoperative behavioral assessments according to the Frankl Scale . - -
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Super Pen
Super Pen Computer-controlled Local Anesthesia delivery system
|
computer controlled local anesthesia delivery device
|
|
No Intervention: Conventional Syringe
Conventional metal syringe
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Self-reported pain using faces pain scale-revised (FPS-r)
Time Frame: Immediately post-procedural (within 1 minute after completion of the local anesthetic injection)
|
Pain intensity measured using the Faces Pain Scale - Revised (FPS-R), ranging from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate greater pain.
|
Immediately post-procedural (within 1 minute after completion of the local anesthetic injection)
|
|
Observer-reported pain using Revised Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Scale
Time Frame: Periprocedural (during local anesthetic injection, from needle insertion until completion of anesthetic delivery)
|
Pain behavior measured using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability - Revised (FLACC-R) Scale, scored from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate greater pain-related distress.
|
Periprocedural (during local anesthetic injection, from needle insertion until completion of anesthetic delivery)
|
|
Physiological-Heart Rate
Time Frame: Baseline (5 minutes prior to local anesthetic injection) and periprocedural (during local anesthetic injection, from needle insertion until completion of anesthetic delivery)
|
Changes in heart rate measured in beats per minute (bpm); increases in heart rate indicate higher physiological arousal associated with pain
|
Baseline (5 minutes prior to local anesthetic injection) and periprocedural (during local anesthetic injection, from needle insertion until completion of anesthetic delivery)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- UJordanLamis2
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.